Refractive outcomes and safety profile after sequential bilateral cataract surgery.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Miguel Omar Ibañez-Esparza, Fernando Mora-González, Beatriz Alvarado-Castillo, Gabriela Estefanía Ibarra-Elizalde, Miguel Ángel Castro-Monreal, Roberto González-Salinas, Miguel Ángel Ibañez-Hernández
{"title":"Refractive outcomes and safety profile after sequential bilateral cataract surgery.","authors":"Miguel Omar Ibañez-Esparza, Fernando Mora-González, Beatriz Alvarado-Castillo, Gabriela Estefanía Ibarra-Elizalde, Miguel Ángel Castro-Monreal, Roberto González-Salinas, Miguel Ángel Ibañez-Hernández","doi":"10.1007/s10792-025-03472-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of simultaneous bilateral cataract surgery (SBCS) in a private ophthalmology clinic, focusing on postoperative refractive outcomes, visual acuity, and the incidence of complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational, retrospective study included 200 eyes from 100 patients who underwent SBCS between January 2018 and April 2020. Preoperative evaluations comprised visual acuity, refraction, biometry, and anterior segment examinations. Surgeries were performed sequentially by a single surgeon using femtosecond laser-assisted or stop-and-chop techniques, with adherence to iSBCS guidelines. Postoperative care included topical antibiotics and steroids, with follow-up at one day and four weeks. Safety outcomes included the incidence of complications, particularly Toxic Anterior Segment Syndrome (TASS), while effectiveness was assessed by postoperative visual acuity and refraction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative complications were observed in 2.5% of cases, including two cases of unilateral TASS, one case of corneal edema, one reactivation of diabetic macular edema, and one of ocular hypertension. All complications were resolved with medical management, and no cases of endophthalmitis were reported. Visual acuity improved significantly, with all eyes achieving 0.096 logMAR or better by week four. Refractive outcomes showed high accuracy, with no significant refractive surprises.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SBCS is a safe and effective procedure, delivering excellent visual and refractive outcomes. The incidence of complications, including TASS, was low, and all cases were successfully managed. This approach can be a viable alternative for patients with bilateral cataracts, particularly in settings with strict adherence to sterilization and surgical protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":14473,"journal":{"name":"International Ophthalmology","volume":"45 1","pages":"129"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-025-03472-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of simultaneous bilateral cataract surgery (SBCS) in a private ophthalmology clinic, focusing on postoperative refractive outcomes, visual acuity, and the incidence of complications.

Methods: This observational, retrospective study included 200 eyes from 100 patients who underwent SBCS between January 2018 and April 2020. Preoperative evaluations comprised visual acuity, refraction, biometry, and anterior segment examinations. Surgeries were performed sequentially by a single surgeon using femtosecond laser-assisted or stop-and-chop techniques, with adherence to iSBCS guidelines. Postoperative care included topical antibiotics and steroids, with follow-up at one day and four weeks. Safety outcomes included the incidence of complications, particularly Toxic Anterior Segment Syndrome (TASS), while effectiveness was assessed by postoperative visual acuity and refraction.

Results: Postoperative complications were observed in 2.5% of cases, including two cases of unilateral TASS, one case of corneal edema, one reactivation of diabetic macular edema, and one of ocular hypertension. All complications were resolved with medical management, and no cases of endophthalmitis were reported. Visual acuity improved significantly, with all eyes achieving 0.096 logMAR or better by week four. Refractive outcomes showed high accuracy, with no significant refractive surprises.

Conclusions: SBCS is a safe and effective procedure, delivering excellent visual and refractive outcomes. The incidence of complications, including TASS, was low, and all cases were successfully managed. This approach can be a viable alternative for patients with bilateral cataracts, particularly in settings with strict adherence to sterilization and surgical protocols.

顺序双侧白内障手术后的屈光效果和安全性。
目的:评价在私立眼科诊所同时行双侧白内障手术(SBCS)的安全性和有效性,重点评价术后屈光、视力和并发症的发生率。方法:这项观察性回顾性研究包括2018年1月至2020年4月期间接受SBCS治疗的100例患者的200只眼睛。术前评估包括视力、屈光、生物测量和前节检查。手术由一名外科医生按照iSBCS指南,使用飞秒激光辅助或停止-切碎技术依次进行。术后护理包括局部抗生素和类固醇,随访1天和4周。安全性结果包括并发症的发生率,特别是毒性前段综合征(TASS),而有效性是通过术后视力和屈光度来评估的。结果:术后并发症发生率为2.5%,其中单侧TASS 2例,角膜水肿1例,糖尿病性黄斑水肿再活化1例,高眼压1例。所有并发症均经医学处理,无眼内炎病例报告。视力明显改善,所有眼睛在第四周达到0.096 logMAR或更好。屈光结果准确度高,无明显的屈光异常。结论:SBCS是一种安全有效的手术,具有良好的视力和屈光效果。并发症发生率低,包括TASS,所有病例都得到了成功的处理。这种方法对于双侧白内障患者是一种可行的替代方法,特别是在严格遵守绝育和手术方案的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
451
期刊介绍: International Ophthalmology provides the clinician with articles on all the relevant subspecialties of ophthalmology, with a broad international scope. The emphasis is on presentation of the latest clinical research in the field. In addition, the journal includes regular sections devoted to new developments in technologies, products, and techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信