Assessment of Perioperative Transfusion Risk for Benign Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Utilizing the ACS-NSQIP.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Sarah Ashmore, Jinxuan Shi, Sarah Collins
{"title":"Assessment of Perioperative Transfusion Risk for Benign Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Utilizing the ACS-NSQIP.","authors":"Sarah Ashmore, Jinxuan Shi, Sarah Collins","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06113-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Routine preoperative laboratory testing is commonly required prior to minimally invasive hysterectomy (MIH) for pelvic organ prolapse (POP), despite limited evidence for its clinical value. We aim to identify transfusion risk for MIH for POP compared with other benign indications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the 2014 to 2021 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Gynecology Participant Use Data File, we performed a retrospective cohort study to determine the risk of perioperative blood transfusion following MIH for benign indications. MIH were identified using CPT codes, and surgical indications were classified according to ICD-9 and -10 codes. Gynecological malignancy risk-reducing indications were categorized as prophylactic. Hysterectomy routes included total laparoscopic hysterectomy, laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy, laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy, and vaginal hysterectomy. Hysterectomies for malignancy were excluded. Perioperative transfusions were defined as those given intraoperatively or within 30 days postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 282,124 patients underwent MIH for benign gynecological indications. Patients undergoing MIH for POP compared with other benign indications were older, had lower BMI, and were less likely to currently smoke (p < 0.001). Overall transfusion rate for benign MIH was 1.2%, and transfusion rates differed significantly by surgical indication (p < 0.001). Patients undergoing MIH for POP had a low rate of transfusion (0.7%) compared with other benign indications such as anemia (15.9%), fibroids (1.8%), and menstrual disorders (1.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients undergoing surgery for POP had significantly lower rates of transfusion than those with other benign indications. Aggressive preoperative precautions, including laboratory testing and redundant intravenous access, are likely excessive in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06113-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Routine preoperative laboratory testing is commonly required prior to minimally invasive hysterectomy (MIH) for pelvic organ prolapse (POP), despite limited evidence for its clinical value. We aim to identify transfusion risk for MIH for POP compared with other benign indications.

Methods: Using the 2014 to 2021 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Gynecology Participant Use Data File, we performed a retrospective cohort study to determine the risk of perioperative blood transfusion following MIH for benign indications. MIH were identified using CPT codes, and surgical indications were classified according to ICD-9 and -10 codes. Gynecological malignancy risk-reducing indications were categorized as prophylactic. Hysterectomy routes included total laparoscopic hysterectomy, laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy, laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy, and vaginal hysterectomy. Hysterectomies for malignancy were excluded. Perioperative transfusions were defined as those given intraoperatively or within 30 days postoperatively.

Results: A total of 282,124 patients underwent MIH for benign gynecological indications. Patients undergoing MIH for POP compared with other benign indications were older, had lower BMI, and were less likely to currently smoke (p < 0.001). Overall transfusion rate for benign MIH was 1.2%, and transfusion rates differed significantly by surgical indication (p < 0.001). Patients undergoing MIH for POP had a low rate of transfusion (0.7%) compared with other benign indications such as anemia (15.9%), fibroids (1.8%), and menstrual disorders (1.5%).

Conclusions: Patients undergoing surgery for POP had significantly lower rates of transfusion than those with other benign indications. Aggressive preoperative precautions, including laboratory testing and redundant intravenous access, are likely excessive in this population.

应用ACS-NSQIP评价良性微创子宫切除术围手术期输血风险。
引言和假设:尽管微创子宫切除术(MIH)对盆腔器官脱垂(POP)的临床价值证据有限,但常规术前实验室检查通常需要在微创子宫切除术(MIH)之前进行。我们的目的是确定与其他良性适应症相比,MIH对POP的输血风险。方法:使用2014年至2021年美国外科学会国家外科质量改进计划妇科参与者使用数据文件,我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,以确定良性适应症MIH后围手术期输血的风险。使用CPT代码识别MIH,并根据ICD-9和-10代码对手术指征进行分类。妇科恶性肿瘤风险降低指征被归类为预防性。子宫切除术途径包括腹腔镜全子宫切除术、腹腔镜宫颈上子宫切除术、腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术和阴道子宫切除术。排除恶性子宫切除术。围手术期输血定义为术中或术后30天内输血。结果:共有282,124例患者因良性妇科指征接受了MIH。与其他良性指征相比,因POP接受MIH的患者年龄较大,BMI较低,目前吸烟的可能性较小(p)。结论:因POP接受手术的患者输血率明显低于其他良性指征的患者。积极的术前预防措施,包括实验室检测和重复静脉注射,在这一人群中可能过度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信