Provider, Caregiver, and Patient Experiences of an Integrated Care Program for Older Adults Designated as Alternate Level of Care: A Qualitative Case Study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
International Journal of Integrated Care Pub Date : 2025-03-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5334/ijic.7629
Adora Chui, Kimia Sedig, Katie N Dainty
{"title":"Provider, Caregiver, and Patient Experiences of an Integrated Care Program for Older Adults Designated as Alternate Level of Care: A Qualitative Case Study.","authors":"Adora Chui, Kimia Sedig, Katie N Dainty","doi":"10.5334/ijic.7629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Following hospitalization, older adults with complex health and social care needs are often deemed to need an \"alternate level of care\" (ALC) where care needs are misaligned with resources. Coordinated networks can implement integrated care programs for this group in home settings. Understanding the experiences of providers, caregivers, and patients will inform ongoing implementation efforts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative case study was undertaken of North York Community Access to Resources Enabling Support (NYCARES), a novel integrated care program implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data collection consisted of semi-structured interviews, document analysis, and observational field notes; data were thematically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-six providers, caregivers, and patients were interviewed. Three themes were developed: 1) NYCARES as a lifeline; 2) Experiences tempered by expectations and connection; and 3) The role of integrated care.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The NYCARES program was seen as valuable, but implementation posed challenges for each participant group due to varying expectations and perceived degree of connection between patients, families, and providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The local coordinated network successfully implemented the NYCARES program for ALC patients despite challenges in stakeholder connections. Similar programs should formally support caregivers and forefront multidirectional communication, particularly between providers in different implementation roles.</p>","PeriodicalId":14049,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Integrated Care","volume":"25 1","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11951966/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Integrated Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.7629","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Following hospitalization, older adults with complex health and social care needs are often deemed to need an "alternate level of care" (ALC) where care needs are misaligned with resources. Coordinated networks can implement integrated care programs for this group in home settings. Understanding the experiences of providers, caregivers, and patients will inform ongoing implementation efforts.

Methods: A qualitative case study was undertaken of North York Community Access to Resources Enabling Support (NYCARES), a novel integrated care program implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data collection consisted of semi-structured interviews, document analysis, and observational field notes; data were thematically analyzed.

Results: Thirty-six providers, caregivers, and patients were interviewed. Three themes were developed: 1) NYCARES as a lifeline; 2) Experiences tempered by expectations and connection; and 3) The role of integrated care.

Discussion: The NYCARES program was seen as valuable, but implementation posed challenges for each participant group due to varying expectations and perceived degree of connection between patients, families, and providers.

Conclusions: The local coordinated network successfully implemented the NYCARES program for ALC patients despite challenges in stakeholder connections. Similar programs should formally support caregivers and forefront multidirectional communication, particularly between providers in different implementation roles.

提供者、照顾者和病人对指定为替代护理水平的老年人综合护理计划的经验:一项定性案例研究。
住院后,具有复杂健康和社会护理需求的老年人通常被认为需要“替代护理水平”(ALC),其中护理需求与资源不一致。协调的网络可以在家庭环境中为这一群体实施综合护理方案。了解提供者、护理人员和患者的经验将为正在进行的实施工作提供信息。方法:对北约克社区资源获取支持(NYCARES)进行定性案例研究,这是一项在COVID-19大流行期间实施的新型综合护理计划。数据收集包括半结构化访谈、文件分析和实地观察笔记;对数据进行主题分析。结果:对36名提供者、护理人员和患者进行了访谈。我们制定了三个主题:1)NYCARES作为生命线;2)由期望和联系调和的经历;3)综合护理的作用。讨论:NYCARES项目被认为是有价值的,但由于患者、家庭和提供者之间的期望和感知程度不同,实施起来对每个参与者群体都提出了挑战。结论:尽管利益相关者之间的联系存在挑战,但当地协调网络成功地实施了针对ALC患者的NYCARES计划。类似的项目应该正式支持护理人员和最前沿的多向沟通,特别是在不同实施角色的提供者之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Integrated Care
International Journal of Integrated Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
887
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 2000, IJIC’s mission is to promote integrated care as a scientific discipline. IJIC’s primary purpose is to examine critically the policy and practice of integrated care and whether and how this has impacted on quality-of-care, user experiences, and cost-effectiveness. The journal regularly publishes conference supplements and special themed editions. To find out more contact Managing Editor, Susan Royer. The Journal is supported by the International Foundation for Integrated Care (IFIC).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信