Alkım Ateşli Yazıcı, Kadriye Memiç Sancar, Serkan Kahraman, Ümit Bulut, Begüm Uygur, Batuhan Yazıcı, Şükrü Hakan Gündüz, Mustafa Yıldız
{"title":"Evaluation of the acute effects of inhaled iloprost on aortic compliance in pulmonary arterial hypertension using invasive methods.","authors":"Alkım Ateşli Yazıcı, Kadriye Memiç Sancar, Serkan Kahraman, Ümit Bulut, Begüm Uygur, Batuhan Yazıcı, Şükrü Hakan Gündüz, Mustafa Yıldız","doi":"10.1007/s00059-025-05315-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is characterized by vascular remodeling and elevated pulmonary vascular resistance. Aortic compliance indicates vascular stiffness and may be increased in PAH. Inhaled iloprost, a prostacyclin analog, is commonly used for PAH treatment and vasoreactivity testing. Its acute effects on aortic compliance remain unclear. This study evaluated the immediate impact of inhaled iloprost on aortic compliance through aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV) measurements and pressure parameters in patients with PAH undergoing right heart catheterization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, cross-sectional study enrolled patients with group 1 PAH who underwent right heart catheterization with pulmonary vasoreactivity testing between August 2022 and May 2023. Aortic compliance was measured via aPWV before and after inhaling 20 mcg/mL iloprost. On the basis of the post-iloprost changes, 32 patients were categorized into high-aPWV (n = 4) or low-aPWV (n = 28) groups. Multivariate regression analysis identified significant predictors of impaired aortic stiffness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median patient age was 54.5 years (42.2-60.5). No significant differences were found between groups regarding percentage reductions in proximal/distal aortic pressure and pulmonary artery pressure after iloprost administration. The QRS interval was a significant predictor of impaired aortic stiffness (odds ratio: 1.072, 95% confidence interval: 1.002-1.197, p = 0.045). The high-aPWV group demonstrated significantly lower QRS intervals compared to the low-aPWV group (79.0 ms [70.5-84.0] vs. 96.0 ms [85.5-102.0], p = 0.011).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Inhaled iloprost effectively reduced both aortic pressure and pulmonary artery pressure regardless of aortic compliance in patients with group 1 PAH. The QRS interval emerged as an independent predictor of impaired aortic stiffness, offering potential for risk stratification in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12863,"journal":{"name":"Herz","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herz","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-025-05315-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is characterized by vascular remodeling and elevated pulmonary vascular resistance. Aortic compliance indicates vascular stiffness and may be increased in PAH. Inhaled iloprost, a prostacyclin analog, is commonly used for PAH treatment and vasoreactivity testing. Its acute effects on aortic compliance remain unclear. This study evaluated the immediate impact of inhaled iloprost on aortic compliance through aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV) measurements and pressure parameters in patients with PAH undergoing right heart catheterization.
Methods: This single-center, cross-sectional study enrolled patients with group 1 PAH who underwent right heart catheterization with pulmonary vasoreactivity testing between August 2022 and May 2023. Aortic compliance was measured via aPWV before and after inhaling 20 mcg/mL iloprost. On the basis of the post-iloprost changes, 32 patients were categorized into high-aPWV (n = 4) or low-aPWV (n = 28) groups. Multivariate regression analysis identified significant predictors of impaired aortic stiffness.
Results: The median patient age was 54.5 years (42.2-60.5). No significant differences were found between groups regarding percentage reductions in proximal/distal aortic pressure and pulmonary artery pressure after iloprost administration. The QRS interval was a significant predictor of impaired aortic stiffness (odds ratio: 1.072, 95% confidence interval: 1.002-1.197, p = 0.045). The high-aPWV group demonstrated significantly lower QRS intervals compared to the low-aPWV group (79.0 ms [70.5-84.0] vs. 96.0 ms [85.5-102.0], p = 0.011).
Conclusions: Inhaled iloprost effectively reduced both aortic pressure and pulmonary artery pressure regardless of aortic compliance in patients with group 1 PAH. The QRS interval emerged as an independent predictor of impaired aortic stiffness, offering potential for risk stratification in clinical practice.
背景:肺动脉高压(PAH)以血管重构和肺血管阻力升高为特征。主动脉顺应性表明血管僵硬,可能在PAH中增加。吸入伊洛前列素,一种前列环素类似物,通常用于多环芳烃治疗和血管反应性测试。其对主动脉顺应性的急性影响尚不清楚。本研究通过测量肺动脉高压右心导管患者的主动脉脉搏波速度(aPWV)和压力参数,评估吸入伊洛前列素对主动脉顺应性的直接影响。方法:这项单中心横断面研究纳入了2022年8月至2023年5月期间接受右心导管插管并进行肺血管反应性检测的1组PAH患者。吸入20 mcg/mL伊洛前列素前后通过aPWV测量主动脉顺应性。根据伊洛前列素后的变化,将32例患者分为高apwv组(n = 4)和低apwv组(n = 28)。多因素回归分析确定了主动脉僵硬受损的重要预测因素。结果:患者中位年龄为54.5岁(42.2-60.5岁)。服用伊洛前列素后,两组间主动脉近端/远端压和肺动脉压的百分比降低无显著差异。QRS区间是主动脉僵硬受损的重要预测因子(优势比:1.072,95%可信区间:1.002-1.197,p = 0.045)。高apwv组QRS间隔明显低于低apwv组(79.0 ms [70.5-84.0] vs. 96.0 ms [85.5-102.0], p = 0.011)。结论:吸入伊洛前列素可有效降低1组PAH患者的主动脉压和肺动脉压,而不考虑主动脉顺应性。QRS间期作为主动脉僵硬受损的独立预测因子出现,在临床实践中提供了潜在的风险分层。
期刊介绍:
Herz is the high-level journal for further education for all physicians interested in cardiology. The individual issues of the journal each deal with specific topics and comprise review articles in English and German written by competent and esteemed authors. They provide up-to-date and comprehensive information concerning the speciality dealt with in the issue. Due to the fact that all relevant aspects of the pertinent topic of an issue are considered, an overview of the current status and progress in cardiology is presented. Reviews and original articles round off the spectrum of information provided.