Detection of formal thought disorders in child and adolescent psychosis using machine learning and neuropsychometric data.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Frontiers in Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-03-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1550571
Przemysław T Zakowicz, Maksymilian A Brzezicki, Charalampos Levidiotis, Sojeong Kim, Oskar Wejkuć, Zuzanna Wisniewska, Dominika Biernaczyk, Barbara Remberk
{"title":"Detection of formal thought disorders in child and adolescent psychosis using machine learning and neuropsychometric data.","authors":"Przemysław T Zakowicz, Maksymilian A Brzezicki, Charalampos Levidiotis, Sojeong Kim, Oskar Wejkuć, Zuzanna Wisniewska, Dominika Biernaczyk, Barbara Remberk","doi":"10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1550571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Formal Thought Disorder (FTD) is a significant clinical feature of early-onset psychosis, often associated with poorer outcomes. Current diagnostic methods rely on clinical assessment, which can be subjective and time-consuming. This study aimed to investigate the potential of neuropsychological tests and machine learning to differentiate individuals with and without FTD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort of 27 young people with early-onset psychosis was included. Participants underwent neuropsychological assessment using the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) and Simple Reaction Time (SRT) tasks. A range of machine learning models (Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forest (RF) and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)) were employed to classify participants into FTD-positive and FTD-negative groups based on these neuropsychological measures and their antipsychotic regimen (medication load in chlorpromazine equivalents).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The best performing machine learning model was LR with mean +/- standard deviation of cross validation Receiver Operating Characteristic Area Under Curve (ROC AUC) score of 0.850 (+/- 0.133), indicating moderate-to-good discriminatory performance. Key features contributing to the model's accuracy included IGT card selections, SRT reaction time (most notably standard deviation) and chlorpromazine equivalent milligrams. The model correctly classified 24 out of 27 participants.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study demonstrates the feasibility of using neuropsychological tests and machine learning to identify FTD in early-onset psychosis. Early identification of FTD may facilitate targeted interventions and improve clinical outcomes. Further research is needed to validate these findings in larger, more diverse populations and to explore the underlying neurocognitive mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":12605,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","volume":"16 ","pages":"1550571"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11955656/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1550571","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Formal Thought Disorder (FTD) is a significant clinical feature of early-onset psychosis, often associated with poorer outcomes. Current diagnostic methods rely on clinical assessment, which can be subjective and time-consuming. This study aimed to investigate the potential of neuropsychological tests and machine learning to differentiate individuals with and without FTD.

Methods: A cohort of 27 young people with early-onset psychosis was included. Participants underwent neuropsychological assessment using the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) and Simple Reaction Time (SRT) tasks. A range of machine learning models (Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forest (RF) and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)) were employed to classify participants into FTD-positive and FTD-negative groups based on these neuropsychological measures and their antipsychotic regimen (medication load in chlorpromazine equivalents).

Results: The best performing machine learning model was LR with mean +/- standard deviation of cross validation Receiver Operating Characteristic Area Under Curve (ROC AUC) score of 0.850 (+/- 0.133), indicating moderate-to-good discriminatory performance. Key features contributing to the model's accuracy included IGT card selections, SRT reaction time (most notably standard deviation) and chlorpromazine equivalent milligrams. The model correctly classified 24 out of 27 participants.

Discussion: This study demonstrates the feasibility of using neuropsychological tests and machine learning to identify FTD in early-onset psychosis. Early identification of FTD may facilitate targeted interventions and improve clinical outcomes. Further research is needed to validate these findings in larger, more diverse populations and to explore the underlying neurocognitive mechanisms.

使用机器学习和神经心理测量数据检测儿童和青少年精神病的形式思维障碍。
形式思维障碍(FTD)是早发性精神病的一个重要临床特征,通常与较差的预后相关。目前的诊断方法依赖于临床评估,这可能是主观的和耗时的。本研究旨在探讨神经心理学测试和机器学习在区分FTD患者和非FTD患者方面的潜力。方法:选取27例年轻早发性精神病患者作为研究对象。参与者通过爱荷华赌博任务(IGT)和简单反应时间任务(SRT)进行神经心理学评估。采用一系列机器学习模型(逻辑回归(LR)、支持向量机(SVM)、随机森林(RF)和极端梯度增强(XGBoost))根据这些神经心理学测量和他们的抗精神病方案(氯丙嗪当量的药物负荷)将参与者分为ftd阳性和ftd阴性组。结果:表现最好的机器学习模型为LR,交叉验证的平均+/-标准差为0.850(+/- 0.133),表明具有中等至良好的区分性能。有助于模型准确性的关键特征包括IGT卡片选择,SRT反应时间(最显著的标准偏差)和氯丙嗪等效毫克。该模型对27名参与者中的24人进行了正确的分类。讨论:本研究证明了使用神经心理学测试和机器学习来识别早发性精神病的FTD的可行性。早期识别FTD可能有助于有针对性的干预和改善临床结果。进一步的研究需要在更大、更多样化的人群中验证这些发现,并探索潜在的神经认知机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Frontiers in Psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.50%
发文量
2813
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychiatry publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research across a wide spectrum of translational, basic and clinical research. Field Chief Editor Stefan Borgwardt at the University of Basel is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal''s mission is to use translational approaches to improve therapeutic options for mental illness and consequently to improve patient treatment outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信