Detection of formal thought disorders in child and adolescent psychosis using machine learning and neuropsychometric data.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Frontiers in Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-03-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1550571
Przemysław T Zakowicz, Maksymilian A Brzezicki, Charalampos Levidiotis, Sojeong Kim, Oskar Wejkuć, Zuzanna Wisniewska, Dominika Biernaczyk, Barbara Remberk
{"title":"Detection of formal thought disorders in child and adolescent psychosis using machine learning and neuropsychometric data.","authors":"Przemysław T Zakowicz, Maksymilian A Brzezicki, Charalampos Levidiotis, Sojeong Kim, Oskar Wejkuć, Zuzanna Wisniewska, Dominika Biernaczyk, Barbara Remberk","doi":"10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1550571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Formal Thought Disorder (FTD) is a significant clinical feature of early-onset psychosis, often associated with poorer outcomes. Current diagnostic methods rely on clinical assessment, which can be subjective and time-consuming. This study aimed to investigate the potential of neuropsychological tests and machine learning to differentiate individuals with and without FTD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort of 27 young people with early-onset psychosis was included. Participants underwent neuropsychological assessment using the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) and Simple Reaction Time (SRT) tasks. A range of machine learning models (Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forest (RF) and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)) were employed to classify participants into FTD-positive and FTD-negative groups based on these neuropsychological measures and their antipsychotic regimen (medication load in chlorpromazine equivalents).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The best performing machine learning model was LR with mean +/- standard deviation of cross validation Receiver Operating Characteristic Area Under Curve (ROC AUC) score of 0.850 (+/- 0.133), indicating moderate-to-good discriminatory performance. Key features contributing to the model's accuracy included IGT card selections, SRT reaction time (most notably standard deviation) and chlorpromazine equivalent milligrams. The model correctly classified 24 out of 27 participants.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study demonstrates the feasibility of using neuropsychological tests and machine learning to identify FTD in early-onset psychosis. Early identification of FTD may facilitate targeted interventions and improve clinical outcomes. Further research is needed to validate these findings in larger, more diverse populations and to explore the underlying neurocognitive mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":12605,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","volume":"16 ","pages":"1550571"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11955656/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1550571","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Formal Thought Disorder (FTD) is a significant clinical feature of early-onset psychosis, often associated with poorer outcomes. Current diagnostic methods rely on clinical assessment, which can be subjective and time-consuming. This study aimed to investigate the potential of neuropsychological tests and machine learning to differentiate individuals with and without FTD.

Methods: A cohort of 27 young people with early-onset psychosis was included. Participants underwent neuropsychological assessment using the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) and Simple Reaction Time (SRT) tasks. A range of machine learning models (Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forest (RF) and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)) were employed to classify participants into FTD-positive and FTD-negative groups based on these neuropsychological measures and their antipsychotic regimen (medication load in chlorpromazine equivalents).

Results: The best performing machine learning model was LR with mean +/- standard deviation of cross validation Receiver Operating Characteristic Area Under Curve (ROC AUC) score of 0.850 (+/- 0.133), indicating moderate-to-good discriminatory performance. Key features contributing to the model's accuracy included IGT card selections, SRT reaction time (most notably standard deviation) and chlorpromazine equivalent milligrams. The model correctly classified 24 out of 27 participants.

Discussion: This study demonstrates the feasibility of using neuropsychological tests and machine learning to identify FTD in early-onset psychosis. Early identification of FTD may facilitate targeted interventions and improve clinical outcomes. Further research is needed to validate these findings in larger, more diverse populations and to explore the underlying neurocognitive mechanisms.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Frontiers in Psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.50%
发文量
2813
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychiatry publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research across a wide spectrum of translational, basic and clinical research. Field Chief Editor Stefan Borgwardt at the University of Basel is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal''s mission is to use translational approaches to improve therapeutic options for mental illness and consequently to improve patient treatment outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信