Screening versions of the European Portuguese MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories Short Forms: development and preliminary validation.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Frontiers in Psychology Pub Date : 2025-03-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1534392
Marisa G Filipe, Cátia Severino, Marina Vigário, Sónia Frota
{"title":"Screening versions of the European Portuguese MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories Short Forms: development and preliminary validation.","authors":"Marisa G Filipe, Cátia Severino, Marina Vigário, Sónia Frota","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1534392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to develop and validate the screening versions of the European Portuguese MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories Short Forms (EP CDI-SFs), intended to guide referrals for comprehensive language assessments in infants and toddlers. The first cohort, aged 8-18 months, included 1,293 typically developing children (<i>M</i> <sub>age</sub> = 12.23, <i>SD</i> = 3.12, 50.2% male), 170 children at-risk for language impairments (<i>M</i> <sub>age</sub> = 11.76, <i>SD</i> = 2.81, 45.9% male), and 39 children with Down syndrome (<i>M</i> <sub><i>age</i></sub> = 12.28, <i>SD</i> = 3.40, 56.4% male), assessed using the EP CDI-SF Level I. The second cohort, aged 16-30 months, included 1,155 typically developing children (<i>M</i> <sub>age</sub> = 23.45, <i>SD</i> = 4.07, 51.2% male), 181 children at-risk for language impairments (<i>M</i> <sub>age</sub> = 23.23, <i>SD</i> = 4.31, 47% male), and 46 children with Down syndrome (<i>M</i> <sub>age</sub> = 23.09, <i>SD</i> = 3.93, 69.6% male), assessed with the EP CDI-SF Level II. Through factor analysis, the 20 most psychometrically robust items from each form were identified and used to develop the new screening versions (EP CDI-Scr). Strong correlations between the EP CDI-SFs and EP CDI-Scr results for typically developing children, along with excellent internal consistency, supported the validity and reliability of the new tools. Furthermore, the EP CDI-Scr versions demonstrated excellent sensitivity and moderate specificity. They effectively distinguished between typically developing children, those at-risk for language impairments, and those with Down syndrome, confirming strong discriminant validity. These findings establish the preliminary validity, reliability, and effectiveness of the EP CDI-Scr, supporting timely referrals for comprehensive language evaluations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1534392"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11956081/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1534392","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and validate the screening versions of the European Portuguese MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories Short Forms (EP CDI-SFs), intended to guide referrals for comprehensive language assessments in infants and toddlers. The first cohort, aged 8-18 months, included 1,293 typically developing children (M age = 12.23, SD = 3.12, 50.2% male), 170 children at-risk for language impairments (M age = 11.76, SD = 2.81, 45.9% male), and 39 children with Down syndrome (M age = 12.28, SD = 3.40, 56.4% male), assessed using the EP CDI-SF Level I. The second cohort, aged 16-30 months, included 1,155 typically developing children (M age = 23.45, SD = 4.07, 51.2% male), 181 children at-risk for language impairments (M age = 23.23, SD = 4.31, 47% male), and 46 children with Down syndrome (M age = 23.09, SD = 3.93, 69.6% male), assessed with the EP CDI-SF Level II. Through factor analysis, the 20 most psychometrically robust items from each form were identified and used to develop the new screening versions (EP CDI-Scr). Strong correlations between the EP CDI-SFs and EP CDI-Scr results for typically developing children, along with excellent internal consistency, supported the validity and reliability of the new tools. Furthermore, the EP CDI-Scr versions demonstrated excellent sensitivity and moderate specificity. They effectively distinguished between typically developing children, those at-risk for language impairments, and those with Down syndrome, confirming strong discriminant validity. These findings establish the preliminary validity, reliability, and effectiveness of the EP CDI-Scr, supporting timely referrals for comprehensive language evaluations.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.20%
发文量
7396
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信