Screening versions of the European Portuguese MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories Short Forms: development and preliminary validation.
Marisa G Filipe, Cátia Severino, Marina Vigário, Sónia Frota
{"title":"Screening versions of the European Portuguese MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories Short Forms: development and preliminary validation.","authors":"Marisa G Filipe, Cátia Severino, Marina Vigário, Sónia Frota","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1534392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to develop and validate the screening versions of the European Portuguese MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories Short Forms (EP CDI-SFs), intended to guide referrals for comprehensive language assessments in infants and toddlers. The first cohort, aged 8-18 months, included 1,293 typically developing children (<i>M</i> <sub>age</sub> = 12.23, <i>SD</i> = 3.12, 50.2% male), 170 children at-risk for language impairments (<i>M</i> <sub>age</sub> = 11.76, <i>SD</i> = 2.81, 45.9% male), and 39 children with Down syndrome (<i>M</i> <sub><i>age</i></sub> = 12.28, <i>SD</i> = 3.40, 56.4% male), assessed using the EP CDI-SF Level I. The second cohort, aged 16-30 months, included 1,155 typically developing children (<i>M</i> <sub>age</sub> = 23.45, <i>SD</i> = 4.07, 51.2% male), 181 children at-risk for language impairments (<i>M</i> <sub>age</sub> = 23.23, <i>SD</i> = 4.31, 47% male), and 46 children with Down syndrome (<i>M</i> <sub>age</sub> = 23.09, <i>SD</i> = 3.93, 69.6% male), assessed with the EP CDI-SF Level II. Through factor analysis, the 20 most psychometrically robust items from each form were identified and used to develop the new screening versions (EP CDI-Scr). Strong correlations between the EP CDI-SFs and EP CDI-Scr results for typically developing children, along with excellent internal consistency, supported the validity and reliability of the new tools. Furthermore, the EP CDI-Scr versions demonstrated excellent sensitivity and moderate specificity. They effectively distinguished between typically developing children, those at-risk for language impairments, and those with Down syndrome, confirming strong discriminant validity. These findings establish the preliminary validity, reliability, and effectiveness of the EP CDI-Scr, supporting timely referrals for comprehensive language evaluations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1534392"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11956081/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1534392","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aimed to develop and validate the screening versions of the European Portuguese MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories Short Forms (EP CDI-SFs), intended to guide referrals for comprehensive language assessments in infants and toddlers. The first cohort, aged 8-18 months, included 1,293 typically developing children (Mage = 12.23, SD = 3.12, 50.2% male), 170 children at-risk for language impairments (Mage = 11.76, SD = 2.81, 45.9% male), and 39 children with Down syndrome (Mage = 12.28, SD = 3.40, 56.4% male), assessed using the EP CDI-SF Level I. The second cohort, aged 16-30 months, included 1,155 typically developing children (Mage = 23.45, SD = 4.07, 51.2% male), 181 children at-risk for language impairments (Mage = 23.23, SD = 4.31, 47% male), and 46 children with Down syndrome (Mage = 23.09, SD = 3.93, 69.6% male), assessed with the EP CDI-SF Level II. Through factor analysis, the 20 most psychometrically robust items from each form were identified and used to develop the new screening versions (EP CDI-Scr). Strong correlations between the EP CDI-SFs and EP CDI-Scr results for typically developing children, along with excellent internal consistency, supported the validity and reliability of the new tools. Furthermore, the EP CDI-Scr versions demonstrated excellent sensitivity and moderate specificity. They effectively distinguished between typically developing children, those at-risk for language impairments, and those with Down syndrome, confirming strong discriminant validity. These findings establish the preliminary validity, reliability, and effectiveness of the EP CDI-Scr, supporting timely referrals for comprehensive language evaluations.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.