Long-acting growth hormone in the treatment of children with growth hormone deficiency.

IF 2.7 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Lorenzo Iughetti, Anna Insalaco, Barbara Predieri, Laura Lucaccioni
{"title":"Long-acting growth hormone in the treatment of children with growth hormone deficiency.","authors":"Lorenzo Iughetti, Anna Insalaco, Barbara Predieri, Laura Lucaccioni","doi":"10.1080/17446651.2025.2486067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The introduction of long-acting formulations in recent years is changing the landscape of growth hormone (GH) therapy. Daily recombinant human GH (rhGH) has been the treatment of choice for children and adults with GH deficiency (GHD), since its approval in 1985. However, decreasing adherence to treatment over time has been identified as a cause of the decline in rhGH efficacy, leading to significant efforts to develop long-acting rhGH (LAGH) formulations.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>A comprehensive analysis of the literature was conducted to evaluate their mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, safety profile, and administration route. The review focuses on the LAGH approved from both the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) for the treatment of pediatric growth hormone deficiency (PGHD): Lonapegsomatropin, Somatrogon and Somapacitan. We aim to facilitate evidence-based clinical decisions by analyzing the available data on the three LAGH formulations.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Even if current evidence suggests a non-inferiority of all the three LAGH formulations when compared to daily rhGH, long-term concerns persist regarding the non-physiological GH profile associated with LAGH, characterized by weekly instead of daily peaks. Further research and real-life studies are required to better define the long-term efficacy of these formulations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12107,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17446651.2025.2486067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The introduction of long-acting formulations in recent years is changing the landscape of growth hormone (GH) therapy. Daily recombinant human GH (rhGH) has been the treatment of choice for children and adults with GH deficiency (GHD), since its approval in 1985. However, decreasing adherence to treatment over time has been identified as a cause of the decline in rhGH efficacy, leading to significant efforts to develop long-acting rhGH (LAGH) formulations.

Areas covered: A comprehensive analysis of the literature was conducted to evaluate their mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, safety profile, and administration route. The review focuses on the LAGH approved from both the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) for the treatment of pediatric growth hormone deficiency (PGHD): Lonapegsomatropin, Somatrogon and Somapacitan. We aim to facilitate evidence-based clinical decisions by analyzing the available data on the three LAGH formulations.

Expert opinion: Even if current evidence suggests a non-inferiority of all the three LAGH formulations when compared to daily rhGH, long-term concerns persist regarding the non-physiological GH profile associated with LAGH, characterized by weekly instead of daily peaks. Further research and real-life studies are required to better define the long-term efficacy of these formulations.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Review of Endocrinology & Metabolism
Expert Review of Endocrinology & Metabolism ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Implicated in a plethora of regulatory dysfunctions involving growth and development, metabolism, electrolyte balances and reproduction, endocrine disruption is one of the highest priority research topics in the world. As a result, we are now in a position to better detect, characterize and overcome the damage mediated by adverse interaction with the endocrine system. Expert Review of Endocrinology and Metabolism (ISSN 1744-6651), provides extensive coverage of state-of-the-art research and clinical advancements in the field of endocrine control and metabolism, with a focus on screening, prevention, diagnostics, existing and novel therapeutics, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信