Phylogenetic allometric scaling of near basal breathing frequency in terrestrial, semi-aquatic and aquatic mammals.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Andreas Fahlman, Elliot Stielstra, Ethan Wilstermann, Simon Rylaarsdam, Josefin Larsson, Guillermo J Sanchez-Contreras, Suguru Higa, Gonçalo N Marques, Malgosia Kaczmarska, Jason Somarelli, Stacy L DeRuiter
{"title":"Phylogenetic allometric scaling of near basal breathing frequency in terrestrial, semi-aquatic and aquatic mammals.","authors":"Andreas Fahlman, Elliot Stielstra, Ethan Wilstermann, Simon Rylaarsdam, Josefin Larsson, Guillermo J Sanchez-Contreras, Suguru Higa, Gonçalo N Marques, Malgosia Kaczmarska, Jason Somarelli, Stacy L DeRuiter","doi":"10.1113/EP091868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We measured the BASAL breathing frequency following an overnight fast in adult, non-pregnant/non-lactating, inactive mammals ranging in body mass from 15 to 5520 kg. The data included results from 338 individual animals from 34 species that were divided into terrestrial, semi-aquatic (Otariidae and Phocidae) and aquatic mammals. Following attempts to limit the collection of breathing frequency using a basal definition and to correct the analysis phylogenetically, our results suggest that there are differences in the allometric mass-exponent between terrestrial and aquatic/semi-aquatic mammals. An allometric regression model, whereby both body mass and breathing frequency were transformed using log<sub>10</sub>, suggested that the allometric mass exponent for terrestrial mammals (-0.303) was different from both aquatic mammals (-0.124) and semi-aquatic mammals (-0.091). For semi-aquatic mammals, the breathing frequency was lower in water, but we detected no association between the breathing frequency and the temperature of the medium (water or air). We propose that allometric studies of cardiorespiratory function should, if possible, adhere to the basal definition during data collection, similar to that used for metabolic rate. Such data will provide valuable information for comparative medicine of large species that are difficult to study, for which controlled baseline data might be difficult to obtain.</p>","PeriodicalId":12092,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1113/EP091868","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We measured the BASAL breathing frequency following an overnight fast in adult, non-pregnant/non-lactating, inactive mammals ranging in body mass from 15 to 5520 kg. The data included results from 338 individual animals from 34 species that were divided into terrestrial, semi-aquatic (Otariidae and Phocidae) and aquatic mammals. Following attempts to limit the collection of breathing frequency using a basal definition and to correct the analysis phylogenetically, our results suggest that there are differences in the allometric mass-exponent between terrestrial and aquatic/semi-aquatic mammals. An allometric regression model, whereby both body mass and breathing frequency were transformed using log10, suggested that the allometric mass exponent for terrestrial mammals (-0.303) was different from both aquatic mammals (-0.124) and semi-aquatic mammals (-0.091). For semi-aquatic mammals, the breathing frequency was lower in water, but we detected no association between the breathing frequency and the temperature of the medium (water or air). We propose that allometric studies of cardiorespiratory function should, if possible, adhere to the basal definition during data collection, similar to that used for metabolic rate. Such data will provide valuable information for comparative medicine of large species that are difficult to study, for which controlled baseline data might be difficult to obtain.

陆生、半水生和水生哺乳动物近基础呼吸频率的系统发育异速缩放。
我们测量了体重在15至5520 kg之间的成年、非怀孕/非哺乳期、不活动的哺乳动物在一夜禁食后的基础呼吸频率。数据包括34种338只动物的结果,分为陆生、半水生(狐尾科和狐尾科)和水生哺乳动物。在尝试使用基本定义限制呼吸频率的收集并对系统发育分析进行修正之后,我们的结果表明,陆地和水生/半水生哺乳动物之间的异速生长质量指数存在差异。采用log10变换体质量和呼吸频率的异速生长回归模型表明,陆生哺乳动物的异速生长质量指数(-0.303)不同于水生哺乳动物(-0.124)和半水生哺乳动物(-0.091)。对于半水生哺乳动物,呼吸频率在水中较低,但我们发现呼吸频率与介质(水或空气)的温度之间没有关联。我们建议,如果可能的话,心肺功能的异速测量研究在数据收集过程中应遵循基础定义,类似于用于代谢率的定义。这些数据将为难以研究的大型物种的比较医学提供有价值的信息,因为这些物种可能难以获得受控的基线数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Experimental Physiology
Experimental Physiology 医学-生理学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
262
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Experimental Physiology publishes research papers that report novel insights into homeostatic and adaptive responses in health, as well as those that further our understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms in disease. We encourage papers that embrace the journal’s orientation of translation and integration, including studies of the adaptive responses to exercise, acute and chronic environmental stressors, growth and aging, and diseases where integrative homeostatic mechanisms play a key role in the response to and evolution of the disease process. Examples of such diseases include hypertension, heart failure, hypoxic lung disease, endocrine and neurological disorders. We are also keen to publish research that has a translational aspect or clinical application. Comparative physiology work that can be applied to aid the understanding human physiology is also encouraged. Manuscripts that report the use of bioinformatic, genomic, molecular, proteomic and cellular techniques to provide novel insights into integrative physiological and pathophysiological mechanisms are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信