Modeling time-varying dispersion to improve estimation of the short-term health effect of environmental exposure in a time-series design.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Danlu Zhang, Stefanie T Ebelt, Noah C Scovronick, Howard H Chang
{"title":"Modeling time-varying dispersion to improve estimation of the short-term health effect of environmental exposure in a time-series design.","authors":"Danlu Zhang, Stefanie T Ebelt, Noah C Scovronick, Howard H Chang","doi":"10.1097/EDE.0000000000001856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Time-series models for count outcomes are routinely used to estimate short-term health effects of environmental exposures. The dispersion parameter is universally assumed to be constant over the study period.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine whether dispersion depends on time-varying covariates in a case study of emergency department (ED) visits in Atlanta during 1999-2009, and to evaluate approaches for addressing time-varying dispersion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the double generalized linear model (DGLM) framework, we jointly modeled the Poisson log-linear mean and dispersion to estimate associations between ED visits for respiratory diseases and daily ozone concentrations. We conducted a simulation study to evaluate the impact of time-varying overdispersion on health effect estimation when constant overdispersion is assumed and developed analytic code for implementing DGLM using R.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found dispersion to depend on calendar date and meteorology. Assuming constant dispersion, the relative risk (RR) per interquartile range increase in 3-day moving ozone exposure was 1.037 (95% CI: 1.024, 1.050). In multivariable dispersion model, the RR was reduced to 1.029 (95% CI: 1.020, 1.039), but with a large (26%) reduction in log RR standard error. The positive associations for ozone were robust against different dispersion model specifications. Simulation study results also demonstrated that when time-varying dispersion is present, it can lead to larger standard error assuming constant dispersion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When the outcome exhibits large dispersion in a time-series analysis, allowing for covariate-dependent time-varying dispersion can improve inference, particularly by increasing estimation precision.</p>","PeriodicalId":11779,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001856","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Time-series models for count outcomes are routinely used to estimate short-term health effects of environmental exposures. The dispersion parameter is universally assumed to be constant over the study period.

Objective: To examine whether dispersion depends on time-varying covariates in a case study of emergency department (ED) visits in Atlanta during 1999-2009, and to evaluate approaches for addressing time-varying dispersion.

Methods: Using the double generalized linear model (DGLM) framework, we jointly modeled the Poisson log-linear mean and dispersion to estimate associations between ED visits for respiratory diseases and daily ozone concentrations. We conducted a simulation study to evaluate the impact of time-varying overdispersion on health effect estimation when constant overdispersion is assumed and developed analytic code for implementing DGLM using R.

Results: We found dispersion to depend on calendar date and meteorology. Assuming constant dispersion, the relative risk (RR) per interquartile range increase in 3-day moving ozone exposure was 1.037 (95% CI: 1.024, 1.050). In multivariable dispersion model, the RR was reduced to 1.029 (95% CI: 1.020, 1.039), but with a large (26%) reduction in log RR standard error. The positive associations for ozone were robust against different dispersion model specifications. Simulation study results also demonstrated that when time-varying dispersion is present, it can lead to larger standard error assuming constant dispersion.

Conclusion: When the outcome exhibits large dispersion in a time-series analysis, allowing for covariate-dependent time-varying dispersion can improve inference, particularly by increasing estimation precision.

在时间序列设计中建立时变离散度模型以改进对环境暴露的短期健康影响的估计。
背景:计数结果的时间序列模型通常用于估计环境暴露对健康的短期影响。在研究期间,普遍假定色散参数是恒定的。目的:研究1999-2009年亚特兰大急诊科(ED)就诊病例中离散度是否取决于时变协变量,并评估处理时变离散度的方法。方法:使用双广义线性模型(DGLM)框架,我们联合建模泊松对数线性平均值和离散度,以估计呼吸系统疾病急诊就诊与每日臭氧浓度之间的关系。我们进行了一项模拟研究,以评估在假设恒定过分散时时变过分散对健康影响估计的影响,并开发了使用r实现DGLM的分析代码。结果:我们发现分散取决于日历日期和气象。假设离散度恒定,3天移动臭氧暴露每四分位数范围增加的相对风险(RR)为1.037 (95% CI: 1.024, 1.050)。在多变量离散模型中,RR降低到1.029 (95% CI: 1.020, 1.039),但对数RR标准误差降低了26%。臭氧对不同色散模式规格的正相关性很强。仿真研究结果还表明,当存在时变色散时,假设色散不变,会导致较大的标准误差。结论:当结果在时间序列分析中表现出较大的离散度时,允许协变量相关的时变离散度可以改善推理,特别是通过提高估计精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epidemiology
Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
177
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Epidemiology publishes original research from all fields of epidemiology. The journal also welcomes review articles and meta-analyses, novel hypotheses, descriptions and applications of new methods, and discussions of research theory or public health policy. We give special consideration to papers from developing countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信