Comparison between removable devices in palatal expansion: a randomised open label clinical trial.

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
E Ortu, M Severino, S Di Nicolantonio, A Carrafiello, S Cova, R Gatto, A Monaco
{"title":"Comparison between removable devices in palatal expansion: a randomised open label clinical trial.","authors":"E Ortu, M Severino, S Di Nicolantonio, A Carrafiello, S Cova, R Gatto, A Monaco","doi":"10.23804/ejpd.2025.2230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Posterior crossbite is a very frequent malocclusion in the Caucasian population and is most often associated with hypoplasia or retrusion of the upper jaw. Treatment involves palatal expansion with the use of fixed or removable orthodontic devices. The aim of the present study is to compare two different devices used in expansion: the Eptamed Equilibrator elastodontic device (series 00) with the Schwartz plate, which is traditionally used in palatal expansion.</p><p><strong>Materials: </strong>70 children (30 boys and 40 girls, average age: 11 ± 1 years) were recruited and divided into a test group and a control group. The test group underwent palatal expansion with the elastodontic device, the control group with the Schwartz plate. Controls were carried out at 6 months and 12 months after the start of treatment. The distance between the cusps of the first upper premolars was taken as the reference or the width between the second deciduous molars. For statistical analysis, the t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test for continuous variables and chi-square test or Kruskal-Wallis test for categorical variables were used.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Eptamed Equilibrator device allows palatal expansion like that achieved with traditional expansion devices, but with greater comfort and greater compliance for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11930,"journal":{"name":"European journal of paediatric dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of paediatric dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23804/ejpd.2025.2230","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Posterior crossbite is a very frequent malocclusion in the Caucasian population and is most often associated with hypoplasia or retrusion of the upper jaw. Treatment involves palatal expansion with the use of fixed or removable orthodontic devices. The aim of the present study is to compare two different devices used in expansion: the Eptamed Equilibrator elastodontic device (series 00) with the Schwartz plate, which is traditionally used in palatal expansion.

Materials: 70 children (30 boys and 40 girls, average age: 11 ± 1 years) were recruited and divided into a test group and a control group. The test group underwent palatal expansion with the elastodontic device, the control group with the Schwartz plate. Controls were carried out at 6 months and 12 months after the start of treatment. The distance between the cusps of the first upper premolars was taken as the reference or the width between the second deciduous molars. For statistical analysis, the t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test for continuous variables and chi-square test or Kruskal-Wallis test for categorical variables were used.

Conclusion: The Eptamed Equilibrator device allows palatal expansion like that achieved with traditional expansion devices, but with greater comfort and greater compliance for patients.

可移动装置在腭扩张中的比较:一项随机开放标签临床试验。
目的:后交叉咬合是白种人中非常常见的一种错颌畸形,通常与上颌骨发育不良或后缩有关。治疗方法包括使用固定或活动正畸装置进行腭部扩张。本研究的目的是比较两种不同的扩张装置:Eptamed Equilibrator 弹性正畸装置(00 系列)和传统上用于腭部扩张的 Schwartz 板:招募了 70 名儿童(30 名男孩和 40 名女孩,平均年龄:11 ± 1 岁),并将其分为试验组和对照组。试验组使用弹力矫正器进行腭部扩张,对照组使用施瓦茨板进行腭部扩张。分别在治疗开始后 6 个月和 12 个月进行对照。以第一上前磨牙尖牙间的距离或第二臼齿间的宽度为参考。统计分析中,连续变量采用t检验或Wilcoxon符号秩检验,分类变量采用chi-square检验或Kruskal-Wallis检验:结论:Eptamed Equilibrator装置可实现与传统扩弓器相同的腭侧扩弓效果,但患者会感觉更舒适、更顺从。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European journal of paediatric dentistry
European journal of paediatric dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim and scope of the European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry is to promote research in all aspects of dentistry related to children, including interceptive orthodontics and studies on children and young adults with special needs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信