Dapagliflozin effects on exercise, cardiac remodeling, biomarkers, and renal and pulmonary function in heart failure patients: not as good as expected?
Massimo Mapelli, Irene Mattavelli, Elisabetta Salvioni, Nicolò Capra, Valentina Mantegazza, Anna Garlaschè, Jeness Campodonico, Filippo Maria Rubbo, Chiara Paganin, Teresa Maria Capovilla, Alessandro Alberto Nepitella, Rebecca Caputo, Paola Gugliandolo, Carlo Vignati, Beatrice Pezzuto, Fabiana De Martino, Giulia Grilli, Marco Scatigna, Alice Bonomi, Gianfranco Sinagra, Manuela Muratori, Piergiuseppe Agostoni
{"title":"Dapagliflozin effects on exercise, cardiac remodeling, biomarkers, and renal and pulmonary function in heart failure patients: not as good as expected?","authors":"Massimo Mapelli, Irene Mattavelli, Elisabetta Salvioni, Nicolò Capra, Valentina Mantegazza, Anna Garlaschè, Jeness Campodonico, Filippo Maria Rubbo, Chiara Paganin, Teresa Maria Capovilla, Alessandro Alberto Nepitella, Rebecca Caputo, Paola Gugliandolo, Carlo Vignati, Beatrice Pezzuto, Fabiana De Martino, Giulia Grilli, Marco Scatigna, Alice Bonomi, Gianfranco Sinagra, Manuela Muratori, Piergiuseppe Agostoni","doi":"10.3389/fcvm.2025.1542870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2-i) are standard therapy for heart failure (HF). We performed a holistic evaluation of dapagliflozin, including its effects on exercise performance, left ventricle (LV) reverse remodeling, cardiac biomarkers, fluid retention, and renal and pulmonary function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled HF reduced ejection fraction (LVEF) outpatients (EF <40%) eligible for SGLT2-i and performed cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPET), pulmonary function tests, bioelectrical impedance vector analysis, and laboratory and echocardiographic assessments at baseline (<i>T</i> = 0), after 2-4 weeks (T1), and after 6 months of treatment (T2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>None of the patients interrupted SGLT2-i for adverse events albeit follow-up was completed by 67 of 75 enrolled patients. At T2, mean LVEF increased (from 34.6 ± 7.8 to 37.5 ± 9.2%; <i>p</i> < 0.001) while end-diastolic (EDV) and end-systolic (ESV) volumes decreased [EDV: 186 (145-232) vs. 177 (129-225) mL, ESV: 113 (87-163) vs. 110 (76-145) mL; <i>p</i> < 0.001]. Peak oxygen intake was unchanged [peakVO<sub>2</sub>: 16.2 (13.4-18.7) vs. 16.0 (13.3-18.9) mL/kg/min; <i>p</i> = 0.297], while exercise ventilatory efficiency (VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope) improved [from 34.2 (31.1-39.2) to 33.7 (30.2-37.6); <i>p</i> = 0.006]. Mean hemoglobin increased (from 13.8 ± 1.5 to 14.6 ± 1.7 g/dL; <i>p</i> < 0.001), while renal function did not change after a transient worsening at T1. NT-proBNP, ST-2, and hs-TNI did not change as overall body fluids and quality of life assessed by KCCQ. NYHA class improved (<i>p</i>=0.002), paralleled by a decrease of MECKI (Metabolic Exercise test data combined with Cardiac and Kidney Indexes) score, from 3.3% (1.9-8.0) to 2.8% (1.2-5.7), suggestive of a positive impact on 2 years prognosis (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dapagliflozin induced positive LV remodeling, improvement of exercise ventilatory efficiency, and NYHA class but without peakVO<sub>2</sub> fluid status and cardiac biomarkers changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12414,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1542870"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11955597/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1542870","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2-i) are standard therapy for heart failure (HF). We performed a holistic evaluation of dapagliflozin, including its effects on exercise performance, left ventricle (LV) reverse remodeling, cardiac biomarkers, fluid retention, and renal and pulmonary function.
Methods: We enrolled HF reduced ejection fraction (LVEF) outpatients (EF <40%) eligible for SGLT2-i and performed cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPET), pulmonary function tests, bioelectrical impedance vector analysis, and laboratory and echocardiographic assessments at baseline (T = 0), after 2-4 weeks (T1), and after 6 months of treatment (T2).
Results: None of the patients interrupted SGLT2-i for adverse events albeit follow-up was completed by 67 of 75 enrolled patients. At T2, mean LVEF increased (from 34.6 ± 7.8 to 37.5 ± 9.2%; p < 0.001) while end-diastolic (EDV) and end-systolic (ESV) volumes decreased [EDV: 186 (145-232) vs. 177 (129-225) mL, ESV: 113 (87-163) vs. 110 (76-145) mL; p < 0.001]. Peak oxygen intake was unchanged [peakVO2: 16.2 (13.4-18.7) vs. 16.0 (13.3-18.9) mL/kg/min; p = 0.297], while exercise ventilatory efficiency (VE/VCO2 slope) improved [from 34.2 (31.1-39.2) to 33.7 (30.2-37.6); p = 0.006]. Mean hemoglobin increased (from 13.8 ± 1.5 to 14.6 ± 1.7 g/dL; p < 0.001), while renal function did not change after a transient worsening at T1. NT-proBNP, ST-2, and hs-TNI did not change as overall body fluids and quality of life assessed by KCCQ. NYHA class improved (p=0.002), paralleled by a decrease of MECKI (Metabolic Exercise test data combined with Cardiac and Kidney Indexes) score, from 3.3% (1.9-8.0) to 2.8% (1.2-5.7), suggestive of a positive impact on 2 years prognosis (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Dapagliflozin induced positive LV remodeling, improvement of exercise ventilatory efficiency, and NYHA class but without peakVO2 fluid status and cardiac biomarkers changes.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers? Which frontiers? Where exactly are the frontiers of cardiovascular medicine? And who should be defining these frontiers?
At Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine we believe it is worth being curious to foresee and explore beyond the current frontiers. In other words, we would like, through the articles published by our community journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, to anticipate the future of cardiovascular medicine, and thus better prevent cardiovascular disorders and improve therapeutic options and outcomes of our patients.