Discrimination between schizophrenia and other psychotic conditions by clinician's difficulty in attunement: a reappraisal of the Praecox Feeling concept.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Frontiers in Psychology Pub Date : 2025-03-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1534377
Laura Fonzi, Mauro Pallagrosi, Cristiano Carlone, Angelo Picardi
{"title":"Discrimination between schizophrenia and other psychotic conditions by clinician's difficulty in attunement: a reappraisal of the Praecox Feeling concept.","authors":"Laura Fonzi, Mauro Pallagrosi, Cristiano Carlone, Angelo Picardi","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1534377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the 1940s, Henricus Cornelius Rümke introduced the concept of <i>Praecox Feeling</i> (PF), a multifaceted clinician's intuition about the nuclear essence of schizophrenia that may play a role in the diagnostic process. Many classical and contemporary psychopathologists have devoted attention to this concept and the issue of intuitive diagnosis of schizophrenia. However, so far very little empirical research was carried out on this topic. This study aimed at testing the hypothesis that the empathic failure described by Rümke as a major experiential dimension underlying the PF as measured by the ACSE Difficulty in Attunement scale can discriminate between schizophrenia and the other psychotic conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study involved 49 clinicians and 326 patients (schizophrenia <i>N</i> = 161, schizoaffective disorder <i>N</i> = 47, delusional disorder <i>N</i> = 35, psychotic mood disorder <i>N</i> = 83) in several psychiatric inpatient and outpatient units. When they saw a new patient, the clinicians completed the Assessment of Clinician's Subjective Experience questionnaire (ACSE) and the 24-item Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While no significant finding was observed in outpatients, several significant between-group differences in ACSE scores were found in inpatients. In multivariate analysis controlling for patient's sex, age, educational level, and clinical severity as measured by BPRS total score, we found that clinicians reported higher levels of Impotence with patients affected by schizoaffective disorder and schizophrenia than with patients affected by psychotic mood disorder, and that clinicians reported higher levels of Difficulty in Attunement with patients affected by schizophrenia than with patients affected by delusional disorder and psychotic mood disorder.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Although our findings should be interpreted with caution due some study limitations, they corroborate the notion that the clinician's feelings, and in particular empathic attunement and its disruptions, play a role in the diagnosis of schizophrenia. They provide preliminary support for Rümke's hypothesis that the PF may help distinguishing between clinically overlapping psychotic conditions. Overall, this study highlights the importance for psychiatry to embrace the relational dimension of the clinical encounter, and to recognize the value of the clinician's subjective participation within the clinical relationship itself.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1534377"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11955589/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1534377","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In the 1940s, Henricus Cornelius Rümke introduced the concept of Praecox Feeling (PF), a multifaceted clinician's intuition about the nuclear essence of schizophrenia that may play a role in the diagnostic process. Many classical and contemporary psychopathologists have devoted attention to this concept and the issue of intuitive diagnosis of schizophrenia. However, so far very little empirical research was carried out on this topic. This study aimed at testing the hypothesis that the empathic failure described by Rümke as a major experiential dimension underlying the PF as measured by the ACSE Difficulty in Attunement scale can discriminate between schizophrenia and the other psychotic conditions.

Methods: The study involved 49 clinicians and 326 patients (schizophrenia N = 161, schizoaffective disorder N = 47, delusional disorder N = 35, psychotic mood disorder N = 83) in several psychiatric inpatient and outpatient units. When they saw a new patient, the clinicians completed the Assessment of Clinician's Subjective Experience questionnaire (ACSE) and the 24-item Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS).

Results: While no significant finding was observed in outpatients, several significant between-group differences in ACSE scores were found in inpatients. In multivariate analysis controlling for patient's sex, age, educational level, and clinical severity as measured by BPRS total score, we found that clinicians reported higher levels of Impotence with patients affected by schizoaffective disorder and schizophrenia than with patients affected by psychotic mood disorder, and that clinicians reported higher levels of Difficulty in Attunement with patients affected by schizophrenia than with patients affected by delusional disorder and psychotic mood disorder.

Discussion: Although our findings should be interpreted with caution due some study limitations, they corroborate the notion that the clinician's feelings, and in particular empathic attunement and its disruptions, play a role in the diagnosis of schizophrenia. They provide preliminary support for Rümke's hypothesis that the PF may help distinguishing between clinically overlapping psychotic conditions. Overall, this study highlights the importance for psychiatry to embrace the relational dimension of the clinical encounter, and to recognize the value of the clinician's subjective participation within the clinical relationship itself.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.20%
发文量
7396
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信