A Study on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Tidal Volume-Diaphragmatic Contraction Velocity: A Novel Index for Weaning Outcome Prediction.

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Apostolos A Menis, Vasiliki Tsolaki, Maria E Papadonta, Vasileios Vazgiourakis, Epaminondas Zakynthinos, Demosthenes Makris
{"title":"A Study on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Tidal Volume-Diaphragmatic Contraction Velocity: A Novel Index for Weaning Outcome Prediction.","authors":"Apostolos A Menis, Vasiliki Tsolaki, Maria E Papadonta, Vasileios Vazgiourakis, Epaminondas Zakynthinos, Demosthenes Makris","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Weaning failure from mechanical ventilation (MV) is primarily caused by increased respiratory load and decreased respiratory neuromuscular competency, leading to a rapid shallow breathing pattern. We hypothesized that the product of diaphragmatic contraction velocity (a sonographic estimate of respiratory load) and tidal volume (an estimate of breathing pattern), termed the volume-velocity index (VVI), may predict weaning outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The diagnostic accuracy of VVI (mL*cm/s) in predicting weaning outcomes was prospectively assessed, along with its relationship to indices of breathing effort, including esophageal pressure swings (ΔPes), the pressure-time product of esophageal pressure (PTPes), and maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP). A power analysis, informed by the results of an inception cohort, determined the required sample size for the validation cohort. Patients were enrolled through consecutive sampling. Weaning failure was defined as failure of the spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) or the need for MV within 48 hours.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study was conducted in a tertiary academic ICU.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>VVI was evaluated in critical care patients undergoing a SBT for the first time.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>In the inception cohort (n = 30), VVI was significantly higher in successful weaning compared to failures (764.76 [±432.61] vs. 278 [±183.66], p < 0.001). It correlated with ΔPes (r = 0.74, R2 = 0.55), PTPes (r = 0.76, R2 = 0.58), and MIP (r = 0.75, R2 = 0.55) all p values less than 0.001. In the validation cohort (n = 40), VVI was higher in successful weaning (840 [550, 1220] vs. 250 [225, 302.5], p < 0.001) and predicted weaning success with an area under the receiver operating characteristic of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.83-1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VVI effectively differentiates between weaning success and failure, shows a strong correlation with respiratory effort indices, and may enhance weaning protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006660","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Weaning failure from mechanical ventilation (MV) is primarily caused by increased respiratory load and decreased respiratory neuromuscular competency, leading to a rapid shallow breathing pattern. We hypothesized that the product of diaphragmatic contraction velocity (a sonographic estimate of respiratory load) and tidal volume (an estimate of breathing pattern), termed the volume-velocity index (VVI), may predict weaning outcomes.

Design: The diagnostic accuracy of VVI (mL*cm/s) in predicting weaning outcomes was prospectively assessed, along with its relationship to indices of breathing effort, including esophageal pressure swings (ΔPes), the pressure-time product of esophageal pressure (PTPes), and maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP). A power analysis, informed by the results of an inception cohort, determined the required sample size for the validation cohort. Patients were enrolled through consecutive sampling. Weaning failure was defined as failure of the spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) or the need for MV within 48 hours.

Setting: The study was conducted in a tertiary academic ICU.

Patients: VVI was evaluated in critical care patients undergoing a SBT for the first time.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: In the inception cohort (n = 30), VVI was significantly higher in successful weaning compared to failures (764.76 [±432.61] vs. 278 [±183.66], p < 0.001). It correlated with ΔPes (r = 0.74, R2 = 0.55), PTPes (r = 0.76, R2 = 0.58), and MIP (r = 0.75, R2 = 0.55) all p values less than 0.001. In the validation cohort (n = 40), VVI was higher in successful weaning (840 [550, 1220] vs. 250 [225, 302.5], p < 0.001) and predicted weaning success with an area under the receiver operating characteristic of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.83-1).

Conclusions: VVI effectively differentiates between weaning success and failure, shows a strong correlation with respiratory effort indices, and may enhance weaning protocols.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信