Adjunctive Sedation with Dexmedetomidine for the Prevention of Severe Inflammation and Septic Encephalopathy: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Study.

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-31 DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000006655
Manuela Iten, Kaspar Bachmann, Stephan M Jakob, Denis Grandgirard, Stephen L Leib, Luca Cioccari
{"title":"Adjunctive Sedation with Dexmedetomidine for the Prevention of Severe Inflammation and Septic Encephalopathy: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Study.","authors":"Manuela Iten, Kaspar Bachmann, Stephan M Jakob, Denis Grandgirard, Stephen L Leib, Luca Cioccari","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Septic encephalopathy (SE) occurs in up to 50% of critically ill patients with sepsis and is associated with a high mortality and morbidity. The pathophysiology of SE is complex and involves increased levels of inflammatory mediators. Commonly used sedative drugs, such as propofol and midazolam, may worsen neuronal inflammation. Dexmedetomidine (DEX) has been shown to decrease the production of inflammatory mediators in experimental models of sepsis. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of DEX on biomarkers associated with SE in critically ill patients with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Pilot, open-label, randomized controlled clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single-center University Hospital, Switzerland.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adult patients with sepsis admitted to the ICU, who required intubation and ongoing sedative medication between September 1, 2019, and June 30, 2022.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>DEX-based sedation compared with propofol and/or midazolam-based sedation and serum S100-β level at 48 hr after randomization.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The study included 70 participants with 34 (48.6%) randomized to the DEX group and 36 (51.4%) to the propofol/midazolam group. Median S100-β levels in the DEX group at 48 hr were 0.103 (interquartile range 0.052-0.194) ng/ml, and in the propofol/midazolam group 0.189 (0.086-0.368) ng/mL ( p = 0.064). Other biomarker showed no differences over time. In patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale less than or equal to 13, the median S100-β level in the DEX group was 0.13 ng/mL (0.06-0.18) compared to 0.91 ng/mL (0.43-0.96) in the propofol/midazolam group ( p = 0.033).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DEX-based sedation compared to propofol/midazolam-based sedation did not show any significant difference in S100-β or any other markers of SE in critically ill patients with sepsis requiring mechanical ventilation. The finding of lower S100-β levels in DEX-sedated patients with GCS less than 13 warrants further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e1377-e1388"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12203981/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006655","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Septic encephalopathy (SE) occurs in up to 50% of critically ill patients with sepsis and is associated with a high mortality and morbidity. The pathophysiology of SE is complex and involves increased levels of inflammatory mediators. Commonly used sedative drugs, such as propofol and midazolam, may worsen neuronal inflammation. Dexmedetomidine (DEX) has been shown to decrease the production of inflammatory mediators in experimental models of sepsis. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of DEX on biomarkers associated with SE in critically ill patients with sepsis.

Design: Pilot, open-label, randomized controlled clinical trial.

Setting: Single-center University Hospital, Switzerland.

Patients: Adult patients with sepsis admitted to the ICU, who required intubation and ongoing sedative medication between September 1, 2019, and June 30, 2022.

Interventions: DEX-based sedation compared with propofol and/or midazolam-based sedation and serum S100-β level at 48 hr after randomization.

Measurements and main results: The study included 70 participants with 34 (48.6%) randomized to the DEX group and 36 (51.4%) to the propofol/midazolam group. Median S100-β levels in the DEX group at 48 hr were 0.103 (interquartile range 0.052-0.194) ng/ml, and in the propofol/midazolam group 0.189 (0.086-0.368) ng/mL ( p = 0.064). Other biomarker showed no differences over time. In patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale less than or equal to 13, the median S100-β level in the DEX group was 0.13 ng/mL (0.06-0.18) compared to 0.91 ng/mL (0.43-0.96) in the propofol/midazolam group ( p = 0.033).

Conclusions: DEX-based sedation compared to propofol/midazolam-based sedation did not show any significant difference in S100-β or any other markers of SE in critically ill patients with sepsis requiring mechanical ventilation. The finding of lower S100-β levels in DEX-sedated patients with GCS less than 13 warrants further investigation.

右美托咪定辅助镇静预防严重炎症和感染性脑病:一项随机对照试验研究。
目的:脓毒性脑病(SE)发生在高达50%的重症脓毒症患者中,并与高死亡率和发病率相关。SE的病理生理是复杂的,涉及炎症介质水平的增加。常用的镇静药物,如异丙酚和咪达唑仑,可能会加重神经炎症。右美托咪定(DEX)已被证明可以减少脓毒症实验模型中炎症介质的产生。本研究的目的是探讨DEX对危重脓毒症患者SE相关生物标志物的影响。设计:先导、开放标签、随机对照临床试验。地点:瑞士单中心大学医院。患者:2019年9月1日至2022年6月30日期间入住ICU的成年脓毒症患者,需要插管并持续使用镇静药物。干预措施:与异丙酚和/或咪达唑仑为基础的镇静和随机分组后48小时的血清S100-β水平进行比较。测量和主要结果:研究纳入70例受试者,其中34例(48.6%)随机分配到DEX组,36例(51.4%)随机分配到异丙酚/咪达唑仑组。DEX组48小时S100-β水平中位数为0.103(四分位数范围0.052-0.194)ng/ml,异丙酚/咪达唑仑组为0.189 (0.086-0.368)ng/ml (p = 0.064)。其他生物标志物没有随时间变化的差异。在格拉斯哥昏迷评分小于或等于13的患者中,DEX组的中位S100-β水平为0.13 ng/mL(0.06-0.18),而异丙酚/咪达唑仑组的中位S100-β水平为0.91 ng/mL (0.43-0.96) (p = 0.033)。结论:在需要机械通气的危重脓毒症患者中,以dex为基础的镇静与以异丙酚/咪达唑仑为基础的镇静相比,S100-β及其他SE指标无显著差异。在GCS小于13的dex镇静患者中发现较低的S100-β水平值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信