Yi-Xin Wang, Orianne Dumas, Raphaëlle Varraso, Yang Sun, Janet W Rich-Edwards, JoAnn E Manson, Kenneth J Mukamal, Yu Zhang, Carlos A Camargo, Carmen Messerlian
{"title":"Occupational exposure to disinfectants and risk of incident cardiovascular disease among US nurses: the Nurses' Health Study II.","authors":"Yi-Xin Wang, Orianne Dumas, Raphaëlle Varraso, Yang Sun, Janet W Rich-Edwards, JoAnn E Manson, Kenneth J Mukamal, Yu Zhang, Carlos A Camargo, Carmen Messerlian","doi":"10.1289/EHP14945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exposure to certain chemicals in disinfectants has been associated with vascular dysfunction in toxicological studies, but the association between disinfectant exposure and clinical cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the association between occupational exposure to disinfectants and subsequent risk of CVD among United States (US) nurses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 75,675 participants from The Nurses' Health Study II who maintained a nursing job and reported data on occupational disinfectant exposure. We estimated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of incident CVD, including coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke, using Cox proportional hazard models comparing job types and general disinfection tasks between participants. We also used a job-task-exposure matrix to evaluate the risk of CVD by frequency of cleaning/disinfection tasks and exposure levels of 7 specific disinfectants (formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde, hypochlorite bleach, hydrogen peroxide, alcohol, quaternary ammonium compounds, and enzymatic cleaners).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During 10 years of follow-up (2009-2019), we documented 726 incident cases of CVD. In fully adjusted models, the hazard ratio of CVD among nurses who worked in operating rooms was 1.72 (95% CI: 1.25 to 2.36), compared with those working as educators or administrators. A similar pattern of associations was found when we separately assessed the risk for CHD and stroke (HR= 1.69 [95% CI: 1.11 to 2.58] and 1.69 [95% CI: 1.05 to 2.74 ], respectively) among operating room nurses, compared with those working as educators or administrators. Those who used disinfectants weekly had modest elevations in CVD risk (HR=1.21 [95% CI: 1.04 to 1.40]), compared with women who never used disinfectants. The highest CVD risk was observed among nurses using disinfectants or spray or aerosol products 4-7 days/week and those exposed to the highest levels of the 7 specific disinfectants listed above.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exposure to disinfectants in real-world healthcare settings was associated with a higher risk of CVD, including CHD and stroke, among US nurses. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14945.</p>","PeriodicalId":11862,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health Perspectives","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Health Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14945","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Exposure to certain chemicals in disinfectants has been associated with vascular dysfunction in toxicological studies, but the association between disinfectant exposure and clinical cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains unclear.
Objective: To evaluate the association between occupational exposure to disinfectants and subsequent risk of CVD among United States (US) nurses.
Methods: We included 75,675 participants from The Nurses' Health Study II who maintained a nursing job and reported data on occupational disinfectant exposure. We estimated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of incident CVD, including coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke, using Cox proportional hazard models comparing job types and general disinfection tasks between participants. We also used a job-task-exposure matrix to evaluate the risk of CVD by frequency of cleaning/disinfection tasks and exposure levels of 7 specific disinfectants (formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde, hypochlorite bleach, hydrogen peroxide, alcohol, quaternary ammonium compounds, and enzymatic cleaners).
Results: During 10 years of follow-up (2009-2019), we documented 726 incident cases of CVD. In fully adjusted models, the hazard ratio of CVD among nurses who worked in operating rooms was 1.72 (95% CI: 1.25 to 2.36), compared with those working as educators or administrators. A similar pattern of associations was found when we separately assessed the risk for CHD and stroke (HR= 1.69 [95% CI: 1.11 to 2.58] and 1.69 [95% CI: 1.05 to 2.74 ], respectively) among operating room nurses, compared with those working as educators or administrators. Those who used disinfectants weekly had modest elevations in CVD risk (HR=1.21 [95% CI: 1.04 to 1.40]), compared with women who never used disinfectants. The highest CVD risk was observed among nurses using disinfectants or spray or aerosol products 4-7 days/week and those exposed to the highest levels of the 7 specific disinfectants listed above.
Conclusion: Exposure to disinfectants in real-world healthcare settings was associated with a higher risk of CVD, including CHD and stroke, among US nurses. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14945.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) is a monthly peer-reviewed journal supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, part of the National Institutes of Health under the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Its mission is to facilitate discussions on the connections between the environment and human health by publishing top-notch research and news. EHP ranks third in Public, Environmental, and Occupational Health, fourth in Toxicology, and fifth in Environmental Sciences.