Brian R Lindman, Philippe Pibarot, Allan Schwartz, J Bradley Oldemeyer, Yan Ru Su, Kashish Goel, David J Cohen, William F Fearon, Vasilis Babaliaros, David Daniels, Adnan Chhatriwalla, Hussam S Suradi, Pinak Shah, Molly Szerlip, Michael J Mack, Thom Dahle, William W O'Neill, Charles J Davidson, Raj Makkar, Tej Sheth, Jeremiah Depta, James T DeVries, Jeffrey Southard, Andrei Pop, Paul Sorajja, Rebecca T Hahn, Yanglu Zhao, Martin B Leon, Philippe Généreux
{"title":"Cardiac Biomarkers in Patients With Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis: Analysis From the EARLY TAVR Trial.","authors":"Brian R Lindman, Philippe Pibarot, Allan Schwartz, J Bradley Oldemeyer, Yan Ru Su, Kashish Goel, David J Cohen, William F Fearon, Vasilis Babaliaros, David Daniels, Adnan Chhatriwalla, Hussam S Suradi, Pinak Shah, Molly Szerlip, Michael J Mack, Thom Dahle, William W O'Neill, Charles J Davidson, Raj Makkar, Tej Sheth, Jeremiah Depta, James T DeVries, Jeffrey Southard, Andrei Pop, Paul Sorajja, Rebecca T Hahn, Yanglu Zhao, Martin B Leon, Philippe Généreux","doi":"10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.125.074425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The EARLY TAVR trial (Evaluation of TAVR Compared to Surveillance for Patients With Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis) demonstrated that early transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) intervention was superior to clinical surveillance with delayed TAVR in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Cardiac biomarkers are associated with maladaptive remodeling, symptom onset, and worse outcomes after TAVR. Whether elevated biomarkers identify asymptomatic patients more likely to benefit from early intervention is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A core laboratory measured NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) levels. Associations between biomarker levels and risk of the trial primary end point (death, stroke, or unplanned cardiovascular hospitalization) and other secondary end points were examined with Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models. Interaction tests were performed to assess whether the treatment effect of early TAVR, compared with clinical surveillance, differed according to biomarker levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 901 patients randomized in EARLY TAVR, 798 (89%) had biospecimens measured (median NT-proBNP level, 287 [145, 601]; median hs-cTnT level, 14.6 [10.5, 21.0]). Higher levels of NT-proBNP and hs-cTnT were broadly associated with higher event rates for multiple end points. In general, there was no significant interaction between baseline biomarkers and treatment group with respect to any composite or individual end point examined, although trends broadly demonstrated a greater relative benefit of early TAVR at lower biomarker levels. There was a significant interaction between hs-cTnT level and treatment group with respect to death or heart failure hospitalization (<i>P</i> <sub>interaction</sub>=0.04) and heart failure hospitalization alone (<i>P</i> <sub>interaction</sub>=0.03) such that the relative benefit of early TAVR was greater for patients with normal, rather than elevated, levels of hs-cTnT at baseline. For some end points, higher baseline NT-proBNP level was associated with numerically greater absolute risk reduction with early TAVR than were lower NT-proBNP levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with asymptomatic severe high-gradient aortic stenosis, higher NT-proBNP and hs-cTnT levels were broadly associated with higher event rates, as expected. However, the relative benefit of an early TAVR strategy was consistent regardless of baseline biomarker levels and, contrary to our hypothesis, tended to be more pronounced in patients with the lowest biomarker levels. These findings suggest limited value for single measurements of these biomarkers to guide the timing of TAVR in asymptomatic patients.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03042104.</p>","PeriodicalId":10331,"journal":{"name":"Circulation","volume":" ","pages":"1550-1564"},"PeriodicalIF":35.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12124205/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.125.074425","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The EARLY TAVR trial (Evaluation of TAVR Compared to Surveillance for Patients With Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis) demonstrated that early transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) intervention was superior to clinical surveillance with delayed TAVR in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Cardiac biomarkers are associated with maladaptive remodeling, symptom onset, and worse outcomes after TAVR. Whether elevated biomarkers identify asymptomatic patients more likely to benefit from early intervention is unknown.
Methods: A core laboratory measured NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) levels. Associations between biomarker levels and risk of the trial primary end point (death, stroke, or unplanned cardiovascular hospitalization) and other secondary end points were examined with Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models. Interaction tests were performed to assess whether the treatment effect of early TAVR, compared with clinical surveillance, differed according to biomarker levels.
Results: Among 901 patients randomized in EARLY TAVR, 798 (89%) had biospecimens measured (median NT-proBNP level, 287 [145, 601]; median hs-cTnT level, 14.6 [10.5, 21.0]). Higher levels of NT-proBNP and hs-cTnT were broadly associated with higher event rates for multiple end points. In general, there was no significant interaction between baseline biomarkers and treatment group with respect to any composite or individual end point examined, although trends broadly demonstrated a greater relative benefit of early TAVR at lower biomarker levels. There was a significant interaction between hs-cTnT level and treatment group with respect to death or heart failure hospitalization (Pinteraction=0.04) and heart failure hospitalization alone (Pinteraction=0.03) such that the relative benefit of early TAVR was greater for patients with normal, rather than elevated, levels of hs-cTnT at baseline. For some end points, higher baseline NT-proBNP level was associated with numerically greater absolute risk reduction with early TAVR than were lower NT-proBNP levels.
Conclusions: In patients with asymptomatic severe high-gradient aortic stenosis, higher NT-proBNP and hs-cTnT levels were broadly associated with higher event rates, as expected. However, the relative benefit of an early TAVR strategy was consistent regardless of baseline biomarker levels and, contrary to our hypothesis, tended to be more pronounced in patients with the lowest biomarker levels. These findings suggest limited value for single measurements of these biomarkers to guide the timing of TAVR in asymptomatic patients.
期刊介绍:
Circulation is a platform that publishes a diverse range of content related to cardiovascular health and disease. This includes original research manuscripts, review articles, and other contributions spanning observational studies, clinical trials, epidemiology, health services, outcomes studies, and advancements in basic and translational research. The journal serves as a vital resource for professionals and researchers in the field of cardiovascular health, providing a comprehensive platform for disseminating knowledge and fostering advancements in the understanding and management of cardiovascular issues.