Effect of Red Blood Cell Transfusion Strategy on Clinical Outcomes Among Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Revascularization: A Prespecified Analysis of the MINT Trial.

IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Sunil V Rao, Maria Mori Brooks, Helen E A D'Agostino, P Gabriel Steg, Tabassome Simon, Herbert D Aronow, Andrew M Goldsweig, Shahbaz Malik, Caroline Alsweiler, Kalon Kl Ho, Payam Dehghani, Adriano Caixeta, Ata R Quraishi, Simon Robinson, Jay H Traverse, Omar Siddiqi, Dean A Fergusson, Brian J Potter, Joshua Schulman-Marcus, Friederike K Keating, Jeffrey L Carson
{"title":"Effect of Red Blood Cell Transfusion Strategy on Clinical Outcomes Among Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Revascularization: A Prespecified Analysis of the MINT Trial.","authors":"Sunil V Rao, Maria Mori Brooks, Helen E A D'Agostino, P Gabriel Steg, Tabassome Simon, Herbert D Aronow, Andrew M Goldsweig, Shahbaz Malik, Caroline Alsweiler, Kalon Kl Ho, Payam Dehghani, Adriano Caixeta, Ata R Quraishi, Simon Robinson, Jay H Traverse, Omar Siddiqi, Dean A Fergusson, Brian J Potter, Joshua Schulman-Marcus, Friederike K Keating, Jeffrey L Carson","doi":"10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.125.015249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The Myocardial Ischemia and Transfusion (MINT) Trial (N=3504) randomized patients with acute MI and a hemoglobin ≤ 10 g/dL to liberal (maintain Hgb ≥ 10 g/dL) or restrictive (maintain Hgb ≥ 8 g/dL) red blood cell transfusion. The results suggested a benefit on 30-day death or MI with a liberal transfusion strategy. The effect of transfusion in acute MI patients undergoing revascularization is unclear. <b>Methods:</b> In this pre-specified analysis of the MINT trial, patients who underwent revascularization (N=1002) before randomization but during index hospitalization were compared with those who did not (N=2442). The primary outcome was 30-day death or MI; secondary outcomes included 30-day death, recurrent MI, the composite of death, recurrent MI, ischemia driven unscheduled revascularization, or readmission for ischemic cardiac diagnosis, heart failure, and cardiac death. Multivariable log binomial regression was used to determine the relative risks of the primary and secondary outcomes by transfusion strategy for revascularized and non-revascularized patients with interaction terms. <b>Results:</b> Patients undergoing revascularization were younger, more often female, and had fewer comorbidities than those who did not. There was no significant interaction between revascularization and assigned transfusion strategy for any outcome except cardiac death. Compared with liberal transfusion, restrictive transfusion increased the risk of 30-day cardiac death among non-revascularized patients [RR 2.45 (1.58, 3.81)] but not among revascularized patients [(RR 0.97 (0.59, 1.60), interaction p 0.006]. <b>Conclusions:</b> In this analysis of the MINT trial, revascularization did not alter the effect of randomized transfusion strategy on 30-day death or MI. The hypothesis-generating finding that a restrictive transfusion strategy was associated with an increased risk of cardiac death among anemic patients with acute MI who do not undergo revascularization requires confirmation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10330,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.125.015249","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Myocardial Ischemia and Transfusion (MINT) Trial (N=3504) randomized patients with acute MI and a hemoglobin ≤ 10 g/dL to liberal (maintain Hgb ≥ 10 g/dL) or restrictive (maintain Hgb ≥ 8 g/dL) red blood cell transfusion. The results suggested a benefit on 30-day death or MI with a liberal transfusion strategy. The effect of transfusion in acute MI patients undergoing revascularization is unclear. Methods: In this pre-specified analysis of the MINT trial, patients who underwent revascularization (N=1002) before randomization but during index hospitalization were compared with those who did not (N=2442). The primary outcome was 30-day death or MI; secondary outcomes included 30-day death, recurrent MI, the composite of death, recurrent MI, ischemia driven unscheduled revascularization, or readmission for ischemic cardiac diagnosis, heart failure, and cardiac death. Multivariable log binomial regression was used to determine the relative risks of the primary and secondary outcomes by transfusion strategy for revascularized and non-revascularized patients with interaction terms. Results: Patients undergoing revascularization were younger, more often female, and had fewer comorbidities than those who did not. There was no significant interaction between revascularization and assigned transfusion strategy for any outcome except cardiac death. Compared with liberal transfusion, restrictive transfusion increased the risk of 30-day cardiac death among non-revascularized patients [RR 2.45 (1.58, 3.81)] but not among revascularized patients [(RR 0.97 (0.59, 1.60), interaction p 0.006]. Conclusions: In this analysis of the MINT trial, revascularization did not alter the effect of randomized transfusion strategy on 30-day death or MI. The hypothesis-generating finding that a restrictive transfusion strategy was associated with an increased risk of cardiac death among anemic patients with acute MI who do not undergo revascularization requires confirmation.

红细胞输注策略对接受血运重建术的急性心肌梗死患者临床结局的影响:MINT试验的预先分析
背景:心肌缺血和输血(MINT)试验(N=3504)将急性心肌梗死和血红蛋白≤10 g/dL的患者随机分为自由(维持Hgb≥10 g/dL)或限制性(维持Hgb≥8 g/dL)红细胞输注。结果表明,自由输血策略对30天死亡或心肌梗死有好处。输血对急性心肌梗死患者血运重建术的影响尚不清楚。方法:在这项预先指定的MINT试验分析中,将随机分组前接受血运重建术但在指数住院期间接受血运重建术的患者(N=1002)与未接受血运重建术的患者(N=2442)进行比较。主要终点为30天死亡或心肌梗死;次要结局包括30天死亡、复发性心肌梗死、死亡、复发性心肌梗死、缺血驱动的计划外血运重建、或因缺血性心脏诊断再入院、心力衰竭和心源性死亡。使用多变量对数二项回归来确定输血策略对血运重建术和非血运重建术患者的主要和次要结局的相对风险。结果:接受血运重建术的患者较年轻,多为女性,且合并症少于未接受血运重建术的患者。除心源性死亡外,血运重建术和指定输血策略之间没有显著的相互作用。与自由输血相比,限制性输血增加了非血运重建术患者30天心源性死亡的风险[RR 2.45(1.58, 3.81)],但在血运重建术患者中没有增加[RR 0.97(0.59, 1.60),相互作用p 0.006]。结论:在MINT试验的分析中,血运重建术并没有改变随机输血策略对30天死亡或心肌梗死的影响。限制性输血策略与未进行血运重建术的急性心肌梗死贫血患者心脏死亡风险增加相关的假设生成发现有待证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
221
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, an American Heart Association journal, focuses on interventional techniques pertaining to coronary artery disease, structural heart disease, and vascular disease, with priority placed on original research and on randomized trials and large registry studies. In addition, pharmacological, diagnostic, and pathophysiological aspects of interventional cardiology are given special attention in this online-only journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信