How Much is Stable the Bonding of CAD-CAM Implant-Supported All-Ceramic Restorations to Titanium Bases Clinically? A Systematic Review.

IF 1.5 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry Pub Date : 2025-03-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CCIDE.S510760
Rola Muhammed Shadid
{"title":"How Much is Stable the Bonding of CAD-CAM Implant-Supported All-Ceramic Restorations to Titanium Bases Clinically? A Systematic Review.","authors":"Rola Muhammed Shadid","doi":"10.2147/CCIDE.S510760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rapid advancement of digital technologies and the introduction of new ceramic materials have largely attributed to the notable transition from metal-ceramic to all-ceramic implant restorations bonded to Ti-bases. The purpose of this review was to evaluate all clinical studies reporting on the bond stability between CAD-CAM implant-supported all-ceramic restorations and Ti-bases. The review was directed according to the PRISMA guidelines to answer the focused question \"How much is the stability and durability of the resin bond between implant-supported fixed CAD-CAM ceramic restorations and Ti- bases clinically?\". The PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases were investigated to identify related clinical studies. Human studies assessing at least 10 patients restored with implant-supported fixed CAD-CAM ceramic restorations luted to prefabricated Ti-bases with a mean follow-up of at least 1 year and published in an English-language up to Sep. 2024 were included. The restorations could be single crown, fixed dental prosthesis, or full-arch fixed prosthesis. The search yielded 5,190 records; of these, 59 full-text articles were evaluated based on eligibility criteria. Ultimately, 40 studies were included. All 40 studies demonstrated low debonding rates from Ti-bases for single copings, multi-unit fixed dental prostheses, and full arch zirconia prostheses. Based on the limited evidence available, different factors were blamed for the debonding incidence, such as Ti-base height, geometry, luting agent, inadequacy of passive fit and biomechanical patient- and prosthesis-related factors. CAD-CAM implant-supported all-ceramic restorations bonded to Ti-bases demonstrated relatively high bond stability during observation period ranging from 1 to 7.5 years. More well-designed clinical research with long-term observation periods is highly recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":10445,"journal":{"name":"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry","volume":"17 ","pages":"181-200"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11955174/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S510760","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid advancement of digital technologies and the introduction of new ceramic materials have largely attributed to the notable transition from metal-ceramic to all-ceramic implant restorations bonded to Ti-bases. The purpose of this review was to evaluate all clinical studies reporting on the bond stability between CAD-CAM implant-supported all-ceramic restorations and Ti-bases. The review was directed according to the PRISMA guidelines to answer the focused question "How much is the stability and durability of the resin bond between implant-supported fixed CAD-CAM ceramic restorations and Ti- bases clinically?". The PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases were investigated to identify related clinical studies. Human studies assessing at least 10 patients restored with implant-supported fixed CAD-CAM ceramic restorations luted to prefabricated Ti-bases with a mean follow-up of at least 1 year and published in an English-language up to Sep. 2024 were included. The restorations could be single crown, fixed dental prosthesis, or full-arch fixed prosthesis. The search yielded 5,190 records; of these, 59 full-text articles were evaluated based on eligibility criteria. Ultimately, 40 studies were included. All 40 studies demonstrated low debonding rates from Ti-bases for single copings, multi-unit fixed dental prostheses, and full arch zirconia prostheses. Based on the limited evidence available, different factors were blamed for the debonding incidence, such as Ti-base height, geometry, luting agent, inadequacy of passive fit and biomechanical patient- and prosthesis-related factors. CAD-CAM implant-supported all-ceramic restorations bonded to Ti-bases demonstrated relatively high bond stability during observation period ranging from 1 to 7.5 years. More well-designed clinical research with long-term observation periods is highly recommended.

CAD-CAM种植体全瓷修复体与钛基的临床粘接稳定性如何?系统评价。
数字技术的快速发展和新型陶瓷材料的引入在很大程度上归因于金属陶瓷到钛基全陶瓷种植体修复体的显著转变。本综述的目的是评估所有关于CAD-CAM种植体支持的全陶瓷修复体与ti基体之间结合稳定性的临床研究报告。该综述是根据PRISMA指南进行的,以回答“临床中种植体支持的固定CAD-CAM陶瓷修复体和钛基之间树脂结合的稳定性和耐久性有多大?”这一重点问题。我们调查了PubMed、谷歌Scholar和Cochrane数据库,以确定相关的临床研究。人类研究评估了至少10例使用种植体支持的固定CAD-CAM陶瓷修复体修复的患者,这些修复体选择了预制ti基,平均随访至少1年,并以英语发表至2024年9月。修复体可采用单冠、固定修复体或全牙弓固定修复体。搜索产生了5190条记录;其中,59篇全文文章根据资格标准进行了评估。最终纳入了40项研究。所有的40项研究都表明,单覆盖体、多单元固定义齿和全弓氧化锆义齿的钛基脱粘率较低。基于现有的有限证据,不同的因素被归咎于脱粘的发生率,如钛基高度、几何形状、牵引剂、被动配合不足以及患者和假体相关的生物力学因素。在1 ~ 7.5年的观察期内,CAD-CAM种植体支持的全陶瓷修复体与钛基的结合表现出较高的结合稳定性。强烈建议进行更多设计良好的临床研究,并进行长期观察。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
43
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信