Health Care Providers' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Toward Medicinal Cannabis: The Case of Lebanon.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-19 DOI:10.1089/can.2024.0013
Bassima Hazimeh, Ibrahim Bou-Orm, Mohamad Mroueh, Walid Ammar
{"title":"Health Care Providers' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Toward Medicinal Cannabis: The Case of Lebanon.","authors":"Bassima Hazimeh, Ibrahim Bou-Orm, Mohamad Mroueh, Walid Ammar","doi":"10.1089/can.2024.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> In 2020, the Lebanese parliament legalized cannabis for medical and industrial use, sparking diverse reactions among health care professionals (HCP). Few studies have been conducted to reflect the position of HCP on the topic, and no previous studies targeted all physicians with relevant specialties or had a large sample size. The current study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice of the Lebanese medical community toward medicinal cannabis (MC). <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional study was conducted targeting HCP from different backgrounds and specialties. The survey questionnaire was disseminated through different scientific societies in the Lebanese Order of Physicians and other professional bodies. An online survey was shared with oncologists, rheumatologists, psychiatrists, neurologists, pharmacists, and psychotherapists across different geographic regions. It covered questions about sociodemographic details, knowledge, attitude, and practice related to MC. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were performed. A total of 202 HCP responded to the survey, yielding a response rate of 34%. <b>Results:</b> Eighteen percent of the participants described their level of knowledge about the indications of MC as good. Twenty-five percent of the respondents are willing to prescribe, and 30% \"may consider\" it. Among those willing to prescribe, the majority may consider MC to treat chronic pain, palliative care, post-traumatic stress disorder, epilepsy, and anxiety. Respondents' knowledge about the side effects of MC is as follows: driving difficulties (82%), addiction (69%), drug interactions (65%), and weight gain (43%). Willingness to prescribe varies by medical specialty, previous clinical experience with MC, and gender. The majority of the participants expressed concerns about the potential harm of using MC and indicated that legalization would negatively impact society. Sixty-nine percent of the respondents reported not receiving any formal education about MC and agreed on the need to expand knowledge about its indications and side effects. The majority agreed that MC should be dispensed based on a prescription from a physician with special training and recognized the importance of establishing a national registry for patients undergoing MC treatment, as well as the necessity of guidelines for approval. <b>Conclusion:</b> The current data indicate that attitudes toward prescribing MC vary by medical specialty, gender, and clinical experience. Implementation of effective educational strategies in Lebanon to enhance HCP knowledge about MC and promote its proper use is crucial.</p>","PeriodicalId":9386,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","volume":"10 2","pages":"e362-e370"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/can.2024.0013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In 2020, the Lebanese parliament legalized cannabis for medical and industrial use, sparking diverse reactions among health care professionals (HCP). Few studies have been conducted to reflect the position of HCP on the topic, and no previous studies targeted all physicians with relevant specialties or had a large sample size. The current study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice of the Lebanese medical community toward medicinal cannabis (MC). Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted targeting HCP from different backgrounds and specialties. The survey questionnaire was disseminated through different scientific societies in the Lebanese Order of Physicians and other professional bodies. An online survey was shared with oncologists, rheumatologists, psychiatrists, neurologists, pharmacists, and psychotherapists across different geographic regions. It covered questions about sociodemographic details, knowledge, attitude, and practice related to MC. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were performed. A total of 202 HCP responded to the survey, yielding a response rate of 34%. Results: Eighteen percent of the participants described their level of knowledge about the indications of MC as good. Twenty-five percent of the respondents are willing to prescribe, and 30% "may consider" it. Among those willing to prescribe, the majority may consider MC to treat chronic pain, palliative care, post-traumatic stress disorder, epilepsy, and anxiety. Respondents' knowledge about the side effects of MC is as follows: driving difficulties (82%), addiction (69%), drug interactions (65%), and weight gain (43%). Willingness to prescribe varies by medical specialty, previous clinical experience with MC, and gender. The majority of the participants expressed concerns about the potential harm of using MC and indicated that legalization would negatively impact society. Sixty-nine percent of the respondents reported not receiving any formal education about MC and agreed on the need to expand knowledge about its indications and side effects. The majority agreed that MC should be dispensed based on a prescription from a physician with special training and recognized the importance of establishing a national registry for patients undergoing MC treatment, as well as the necessity of guidelines for approval. Conclusion: The current data indicate that attitudes toward prescribing MC vary by medical specialty, gender, and clinical experience. Implementation of effective educational strategies in Lebanon to enhance HCP knowledge about MC and promote its proper use is crucial.

卫生保健提供者的知识,态度和做法对药用大麻:黎巴嫩的情况。
背景:2020年,黎巴嫩议会将用于医疗和工业用途的大麻合法化,引发了卫生保健专业人员(HCP)的不同反应。很少有研究反映HCP在这一问题上的立场,而且以前的研究也没有针对所有具有相关专业的医生或具有大样本量。本研究旨在评估黎巴嫩医学界对医用大麻(MC)的知识、态度和实践。方法:针对不同背景和专业的HCP患者进行横断面研究。调查问卷通过黎巴嫩医师协会和其他专业机构的不同科学学会散发。来自不同地理区域的肿瘤学家、风湿病学家、精神病学家、神经学家、药剂师和心理治疗师分享了一项在线调查。它涵盖了与MC相关的社会人口学细节、知识、态度和实践等问题。进行了描述性和双变量分析。共有202家HCP对调查作出回应,回复率为34%。结果:18%的参与者描述他们对MC指征的知识水平为良好。25%的受访者愿意开处方,30%的人“可能考虑”开处方。在那些愿意开处方的人中,大多数人可能会考虑MC治疗慢性疼痛、姑息治疗、创伤后应激障碍、癫痫和焦虑。受访者对MC副作用的认识如下:驾驶困难(82%)、成瘾(69%)、药物相互作用(65%)和体重增加(43%)。开处方的意愿因医学专业、既往MC临床经验和性别而异。大多数嘉宾对使用大麻的潜在危害表示关注,并指出大麻合法化会对社会产生负面影响。69%的受访者表示没有接受过任何正规的MC教育,并同意有必要扩大对其适应症和副作用的了解。大多数人同意,MC应该根据经过特殊培训的医生开出的处方进行分配,并认识到为接受MC治疗的患者建立国家登记的重要性,以及批准指南的必要性。结论:目前的数据表明,不同的医学专业、性别和临床经验对处方MC的态度不同。在黎巴嫩实施有效的教育战略以提高卫生保健人员对MC的认识并促进其正确使用是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.90%
发文量
164
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信