Relationship between immunogenicity and protein structure at amino acid substitution sites of blood group antigens.

IF 21 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Blood Pub Date : 2025-07-24 DOI:10.1182/blood.2024025071
John G Howe, Gary Stack
{"title":"Relationship between immunogenicity and protein structure at amino acid substitution sites of blood group antigens.","authors":"John G Howe, Gary Stack","doi":"10.1182/blood.2024025071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Polypeptide blood group antigens, many of which are created by single exofacial amino acid substitutions, have varying immunogenicities. Why some amino acid substitutions are more immunogenic than others is little understood. Using AlphaFold2, an artificial intelligence system that predicts 3-dimensional protein structure, along with multiple other structure analysis programs, we investigated protein structure at sites of amino acid substitutions that create 9 clinically significant blood group antigens. Based on structure predictions, the amino acid substitutions that create the 4 most immunogenic of the 9 antigens (K, Jka, Lua, and E) were typically buried or partially buried in rigid, ordered protein regions, usually helices and β-strands. This was reflected by their lower mean relative solvent accessibility (RSA) than the 5 less immunogenic antigens (c, M, Fya, C, and S; 0.13 vs 0.81; P = .003) and higher mean AlphaFold2 confidence score (92.5 vs 48.3; P = .001; scores <50 predict protein disorder). Substitutions creating the 5 least immunogenic antigens (c, Fya, M, C, and S) were all predicted to be in flexible regions with high accessibility, either in surface-accessible loops (C, c) or disordered coils (Fya, M, and S). Scatter plots revealed a positive linear correlation of immunogenicity with confidence score (R2 = 0.826; P = .0007) and percent helix/β-strand in 15-mers centered around the substitution sites (R2 = 0.763; P = .0021) and a negative linear correlation with RSA (R2 = 0.688; P = .0057). Therefore, based on an informatics analysis, the protein secondary and tertiary structures at amino acid substitution sites that create blood group antigens are significant correlates and potential determinants of immunogenicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":9102,"journal":{"name":"Blood","volume":" ","pages":"504-517"},"PeriodicalIF":21.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2024025071","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Polypeptide blood group antigens, many of which are created by single exofacial amino acid substitutions, have varying immunogenicities. Why some amino acid substitutions are more immunogenic than others is little understood. Using AlphaFold2, an artificial intelligence system that predicts 3-dimensional protein structure, along with multiple other structure analysis programs, we investigated protein structure at sites of amino acid substitutions that create 9 clinically significant blood group antigens. Based on structure predictions, the amino acid substitutions that create the 4 most immunogenic of the 9 antigens (K, Jka, Lua, and E) were typically buried or partially buried in rigid, ordered protein regions, usually helices and β-strands. This was reflected by their lower mean relative solvent accessibility (RSA) than the 5 less immunogenic antigens (c, M, Fya, C, and S; 0.13 vs 0.81; P = .003) and higher mean AlphaFold2 confidence score (92.5 vs 48.3; P = .001; scores <50 predict protein disorder). Substitutions creating the 5 least immunogenic antigens (c, Fya, M, C, and S) were all predicted to be in flexible regions with high accessibility, either in surface-accessible loops (C, c) or disordered coils (Fya, M, and S). Scatter plots revealed a positive linear correlation of immunogenicity with confidence score (R2 = 0.826; P = .0007) and percent helix/β-strand in 15-mers centered around the substitution sites (R2 = 0.763; P = .0021) and a negative linear correlation with RSA (R2 = 0.688; P = .0057). Therefore, based on an informatics analysis, the protein secondary and tertiary structures at amino acid substitution sites that create blood group antigens are significant correlates and potential determinants of immunogenicity.

血型抗原氨基酸取代位点蛋白结构与免疫原性的关系
多肽血型抗原,其中许多是由单个外表面氨基酸(AA)取代产生的,具有不同的免疫原性。为什么一些AA取代比其他取代具有更强的免疫原性尚不清楚。使用人工智能系统AlphaFold2预测三维蛋白质结构以及多种其他结构分析程序,我们研究了产生9种临床重要血型抗原的AA取代位点的蛋白质结构。根据结构预测,产生九种抗原(K, Jka, Lua, E)中最具免疫原性的四种AA取代通常被埋在或部分埋在刚性有序的蛋白质区域,通常是螺旋和β-链。这反映在它们的平均相对溶剂可及性(RSA)低于五种免疫原性较低的抗原(c, M, Fya, c, S;0.13 vs 0.81;P= 0.003),平均AlphaFold2置信度评分更高(92.5比48.3;P =措施;分数
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Blood
Blood 医学-血液学
CiteScore
23.60
自引率
3.90%
发文量
955
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Blood, the official journal of the American Society of Hematology, published online and in print, provides an international forum for the publication of original articles describing basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations in hematology. Primary research articles will be published under the following scientific categories: Clinical Trials and Observations; Gene Therapy; Hematopoiesis and Stem Cells; Immunobiology and Immunotherapy scope; Myeloid Neoplasia; Lymphoid Neoplasia; Phagocytes, Granulocytes and Myelopoiesis; Platelets and Thrombopoiesis; Red Cells, Iron and Erythropoiesis; Thrombosis and Hemostasis; Transfusion Medicine; Transplantation; and Vascular Biology. Papers can be listed under more than one category as appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信