Gatekeeper training for suicide prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Hui Liu, Chaohui Zheng, Yu Cao, Fanyan Zeng, Huiting Chen, Wei Gao
{"title":"Gatekeeper training for suicide prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Hui Liu, Chaohui Zheng, Yu Cao, Fanyan Zeng, Huiting Chen, Wei Gao","doi":"10.1186/s12889-025-21736-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gatekeeper training (GKT) aims to enhance suicide gatekeepers' (GKs) abilities in assessing suicide risk, identify those at-risk and refer them. However, existing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on GKT have not produced definitive results. This study reviewed RCTs on GKT to provide evidence for developing effective suicide prevention strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Embase, Google Scholar, Medrxiv, and Ebsco for English-language RCTs published between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2024. Two authors independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random-effect model. Heterogeneity was assessed by using I<sup>2</sup> statistic, and publication bias was evaluated through funnel plots and Egger's regression. We stratified participants into subgroups by characteristics and categorized interventions by delivery mode (online vs. offline). Post-test and follow-up data were integrated into a unified model, with follow-ups classified as short-term (1-5 months) or long-term (> 5 months). All analyses were performed using R version 3.4.0, following the PRISMA guidelines (registration number: CRD42024507513).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen studies were included. Compared to the control group, gatekeepers showed increased suicide knowledge (SMD = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.32 - 1.13) and enhanced self-efficacy (SMD = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.33 - 1.13) for suicide prevention. For knowledge, the improvements were sustained in the short-term (SMD = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.22 - 1.06) but diminished in the long-term (SMD = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.05 - 0.45). Online interventions showed a significant improvement in self-efficacy (SMD = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.73 - 1.32), while offline interventions demonstrated a potential but non-significant improvement (SMD = 0.53, 95% CI: -0.08 - 1.17). Preparedness also showed a significant improvement (SMD = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.31 - 1.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis demonstrated GKT's effectiveness in enhancing knowledge and self-efficacy (moderate effect) for suicide prevention. However, the positive effects tend to decrease over time. Online training offers significant benefits, making it a viable option for widespread implementation. Additionally, the selection of gatekeepers plays a crucial role in ensuring the effectiveness of online GKT programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"1206"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11956478/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21736-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Gatekeeper training (GKT) aims to enhance suicide gatekeepers' (GKs) abilities in assessing suicide risk, identify those at-risk and refer them. However, existing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on GKT have not produced definitive results. This study reviewed RCTs on GKT to provide evidence for developing effective suicide prevention strategies.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Embase, Google Scholar, Medrxiv, and Ebsco for English-language RCTs published between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2024. Two authors independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random-effect model. Heterogeneity was assessed by using I2 statistic, and publication bias was evaluated through funnel plots and Egger's regression. We stratified participants into subgroups by characteristics and categorized interventions by delivery mode (online vs. offline). Post-test and follow-up data were integrated into a unified model, with follow-ups classified as short-term (1-5 months) or long-term (> 5 months). All analyses were performed using R version 3.4.0, following the PRISMA guidelines (registration number: CRD42024507513).

Results: Sixteen studies were included. Compared to the control group, gatekeepers showed increased suicide knowledge (SMD = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.32 - 1.13) and enhanced self-efficacy (SMD = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.33 - 1.13) for suicide prevention. For knowledge, the improvements were sustained in the short-term (SMD = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.22 - 1.06) but diminished in the long-term (SMD = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.05 - 0.45). Online interventions showed a significant improvement in self-efficacy (SMD = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.73 - 1.32), while offline interventions demonstrated a potential but non-significant improvement (SMD = 0.53, 95% CI: -0.08 - 1.17). Preparedness also showed a significant improvement (SMD = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.31 - 1.07).

Conclusion: This meta-analysis demonstrated GKT's effectiveness in enhancing knowledge and self-efficacy (moderate effect) for suicide prevention. However, the positive effects tend to decrease over time. Online training offers significant benefits, making it a viable option for widespread implementation. Additionally, the selection of gatekeepers plays a crucial role in ensuring the effectiveness of online GKT programs.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信