Loneliness in acquired brain injury; a qualitative exploration of lived experience.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Orla Duffy, Katy Pedlow, Jacqueline Pogue, Julie-Ann Jordan, Laura Dunlop, Rachael Agnew, Ian Taylor, Robert Rauch
{"title":"Loneliness in acquired brain injury; a qualitative exploration of lived experience.","authors":"Orla Duffy, Katy Pedlow, Jacqueline Pogue, Julie-Ann Jordan, Laura Dunlop, Rachael Agnew, Ian Taylor, Robert Rauch","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2025.2472190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Loneliness is one of the biggest health concerns in the UK and is recognized as a health priority in Northern Ireland. Following an acquired brain injury (ABI), there is a sudden and catastrophic loss of function, impacting many areas of life, including loneliness. We explored the meaning of loneliness for adults with ABI and the experiences and factors influencing their loneliness.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative study including three focus groups and four individual interviews, using a semi-structured interview guide, and recorded online.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were recruited from the Community Brain Injury team caseload. Twenty-three adults (6 female, 17 male), ranging from 2 to 24 years post - ABI, participated. Data were thematically analyzed using a deductive approach, using framework analysis to guide theme development.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Loneliness had a different meaning to participants, yet all experienced it at some point in their journey post-ABI. Four themes were derived from the focus group transcriptions; 1) 'A black hole with no sun' (definition) 2) 'A missing piece' (impairments) 3) 'I've become poor old mum' (identity) 4) 'Our own kind' (coping). Sub-themes were derived providing an in-depth exploration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Supporting loneliness post-ABI is challenging and multifactorial. Early identification and support by clinical teams is crucial. The findings suggest mechanisms to provide such support, directly from those with lived experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain injury","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2025.2472190","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Loneliness is one of the biggest health concerns in the UK and is recognized as a health priority in Northern Ireland. Following an acquired brain injury (ABI), there is a sudden and catastrophic loss of function, impacting many areas of life, including loneliness. We explored the meaning of loneliness for adults with ABI and the experiences and factors influencing their loneliness.

Design: Qualitative study including three focus groups and four individual interviews, using a semi-structured interview guide, and recorded online.

Methods: Participants were recruited from the Community Brain Injury team caseload. Twenty-three adults (6 female, 17 male), ranging from 2 to 24 years post - ABI, participated. Data were thematically analyzed using a deductive approach, using framework analysis to guide theme development.

Results: Loneliness had a different meaning to participants, yet all experienced it at some point in their journey post-ABI. Four themes were derived from the focus group transcriptions; 1) 'A black hole with no sun' (definition) 2) 'A missing piece' (impairments) 3) 'I've become poor old mum' (identity) 4) 'Our own kind' (coping). Sub-themes were derived providing an in-depth exploration.

Conclusions: Supporting loneliness post-ABI is challenging and multifactorial. Early identification and support by clinical teams is crucial. The findings suggest mechanisms to provide such support, directly from those with lived experience.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain injury
Brain injury 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
148
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Brain Injury publishes critical information relating to research and clinical practice, adult and pediatric populations. The journal covers a full range of relevant topics relating to clinical, translational, and basic science research. Manuscripts address emergency and acute medical care, acute and post-acute rehabilitation, family and vocational issues, and long-term supports. Coverage includes assessment and interventions for functional, communication, neurological and psychological disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信