Is the association between graded sickness absence and return to work confounded by health? A longitudinal cohort study from the Norwegian neck and back registry.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ingvild Bardal, Nils Abel Prestegård Aars, Samineh Sanatkar, Sharon Am Stevelink, Oda Lekve Brandseth, Beate Brinchmann, Arnstein Mykletun
{"title":"Is the association between graded sickness absence and return to work confounded by health? A longitudinal cohort study from the Norwegian neck and back registry.","authors":"Ingvild Bardal, Nils Abel Prestegård Aars, Samineh Sanatkar, Sharon Am Stevelink, Oda Lekve Brandseth, Beate Brinchmann, Arnstein Mykletun","doi":"10.1186/s12889-025-22368-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) are among the leading causes of sickness absence (SA) and disability. Graded sickness absence (GSA) as an alternative to full time sickness absence (FSA) has been implemented in the Nordic countries to promote return to work (RTW) and prevent disability, similar to the Fit Note in the UK. However, the evidence of the effects of GSA on RTW is limited. FSA is plausibly associated with more health problems than GSA. The aim is to investigate if the hypothesized benefits of GSA over FSA on RTW is confounded by health in a cohort of sick listed patients referred to secondary care due to MSD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was obtained from the Norwegian Neck and Back Register and the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration. Poisson regression was used to estimate the association of GSA versus FSA on RTW at 12 months after assessment, with and without adjustment for measures of symptom severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3371 patients were on GSA (n = 1671, 49.6%) or FSA (n = 1700, 50.4%) at baseline. Patients on FSA reported more severe symptoms than those on GSA on all measures, and detailed analysis of GSA indicated more severe symptoms with higher SA levels. Patients on GSA had higher rates of RTW at 12 months follow up than patients on FSA (unadjusted RR = 1.29, 95% CI 1.22-1.37), and the association remained in the fully adjusted model (RR = 1.19, 95% CI 1.12-1.26). We found an association between levels of GSA and RTW rates, with more work being associated with higher RR for RTW.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among sick listed patients referred to secondary care due to MSD, GSA is associated with higher rates of RTW than FSA. Some of the beneficial association between GSA and RTW is confounded by higher symptom levels in FSA than GSA patients, but most of the benefit remains after adjusting for symptom severity. Mechanisms for the benefit of GSA remains unknown.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"1202"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11956489/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-22368-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) are among the leading causes of sickness absence (SA) and disability. Graded sickness absence (GSA) as an alternative to full time sickness absence (FSA) has been implemented in the Nordic countries to promote return to work (RTW) and prevent disability, similar to the Fit Note in the UK. However, the evidence of the effects of GSA on RTW is limited. FSA is plausibly associated with more health problems than GSA. The aim is to investigate if the hypothesized benefits of GSA over FSA on RTW is confounded by health in a cohort of sick listed patients referred to secondary care due to MSD.

Methods: Data was obtained from the Norwegian Neck and Back Register and the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration. Poisson regression was used to estimate the association of GSA versus FSA on RTW at 12 months after assessment, with and without adjustment for measures of symptom severity.

Results: A total of 3371 patients were on GSA (n = 1671, 49.6%) or FSA (n = 1700, 50.4%) at baseline. Patients on FSA reported more severe symptoms than those on GSA on all measures, and detailed analysis of GSA indicated more severe symptoms with higher SA levels. Patients on GSA had higher rates of RTW at 12 months follow up than patients on FSA (unadjusted RR = 1.29, 95% CI 1.22-1.37), and the association remained in the fully adjusted model (RR = 1.19, 95% CI 1.12-1.26). We found an association between levels of GSA and RTW rates, with more work being associated with higher RR for RTW.

Conclusions: Among sick listed patients referred to secondary care due to MSD, GSA is associated with higher rates of RTW than FSA. Some of the beneficial association between GSA and RTW is confounded by higher symptom levels in FSA than GSA patients, but most of the benefit remains after adjusting for symptom severity. Mechanisms for the benefit of GSA remains unknown.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信