Current trends on clinical audit on surgical record keeping.

IF 1.9
Bioinformation Pub Date : 2024-11-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.6026/9732063002001654
Lakshay Singla
{"title":"Current trends on clinical audit on surgical record keeping.","authors":"Lakshay Singla","doi":"10.6026/9732063002001654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this audit was to evaluate compliance with the local surgical record-keeping policy, identify areas of non-compliance and recommend improvements. A retrospective review was conducted using 30 randomly selected inpatient records from the surgical department, audited over two quarters (Q1 and Q2 of 2023). Data were extracted via the Electronic Data Management System (EDMS) and analyzed using the trust's record-keeping audit tool. The audit assessed compliance with 30 standards, with 10 standards targeting 100% compliance and 20 standards targeting 75% compliance. The audit highlighted significant deficits in surgical record keeping, with major issues being illegible entries, missing clinician designations and inconsistent use of approved abbreviations. Although improvements were observed in certain areas, such as proper documentation of date and time, further efforts are needed to enhance compliance across all standards. Recommendations include improved induction training, standardized documentation layouts and prompt recording of clinical events.</p>","PeriodicalId":8962,"journal":{"name":"Bioinformation","volume":"20 11","pages":"1654-1657"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11953533/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioinformation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6026/9732063002001654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this audit was to evaluate compliance with the local surgical record-keeping policy, identify areas of non-compliance and recommend improvements. A retrospective review was conducted using 30 randomly selected inpatient records from the surgical department, audited over two quarters (Q1 and Q2 of 2023). Data were extracted via the Electronic Data Management System (EDMS) and analyzed using the trust's record-keeping audit tool. The audit assessed compliance with 30 standards, with 10 standards targeting 100% compliance and 20 standards targeting 75% compliance. The audit highlighted significant deficits in surgical record keeping, with major issues being illegible entries, missing clinician designations and inconsistent use of approved abbreviations. Although improvements were observed in certain areas, such as proper documentation of date and time, further efforts are needed to enhance compliance across all standards. Recommendations include improved induction training, standardized documentation layouts and prompt recording of clinical events.

手术记录的临床审计现状。
本次审核的目的是评估对当地手术记录保存政策的遵守情况,确定不遵守的领域并提出改进建议。回顾性审查使用了30个随机选择的外科住院记录,审计了两个季度(2023年第一季度和第二季度)。数据通过电子数据管理系统(EDMS)提取,并使用信托的记录审计工具进行分析。审计评估了30个标准的合规性,其中10个标准的合规性为100%,20个标准的合规性为75%。审计突出了外科记录保存的重大缺陷,主要问题是难以辨认的条目,缺少临床医生指定和不一致使用批准的缩写。虽然在某些方面有所改进,例如日期和时间的适当记录,但需要进一步努力加强对所有标准的遵守。建议包括改进入职培训、标准化文件布局和及时记录临床事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bioinformation
Bioinformation MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信