The Role of Community Science in Addressing Policy Change: A Critical Review of Air Pollution Literature.

IF 7.4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Emilia Oscilowicz, Guadalupe A Solís, Laura Martinez, Jeremy Németh, Gregory L Simon, Carrie Makarewicz, Katherine L Dickinson, Lisa M Mckenzie, Jean Scandlyn, Paulina Erices-Ocampo, Patrick L Kinney, Priyanka DeSouza
{"title":"The Role of Community Science in Addressing Policy Change: A Critical Review of Air Pollution Literature.","authors":"Emilia Oscilowicz, Guadalupe A Solís, Laura Martinez, Jeremy Németh, Gregory L Simon, Carrie Makarewicz, Katherine L Dickinson, Lisa M Mckenzie, Jean Scandlyn, Paulina Erices-Ocampo, Patrick L Kinney, Priyanka DeSouza","doi":"10.1007/s40572-025-00483-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Community air pollution science serves as a vital tool in public health and urban planning, enabling communities to advocate for policy changes that improve public health outcomes. Despite its potential, there is a noticeable gap in translating research findings into policy actions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This review aims to assess the focus of studies on community air pollution science published between 1990-2023 and identify the extent to which these studies address the research-to-policy gap.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive review of 131 studies that utilize low-cost sensors for monitoring air pollution. The review specifically looked for how these studies contribute to bridging the research-to-policy gap.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings indicate a significant emphasis on evaluating the performance of low-cost sensors, with 90% of the studies centered on this aspect. Only 10% of the studies explicitly aimed at addressing the research-to-policy gap. Among these, 10 studies employed distinct theories of change to tackle this issue effectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a critical need for a paradigm shift in community science research to enhance the impact of scientific findings on policy-making. This shift should include strategies such as equitable sensor distribution, a broader focus on regions in the Global South, and proactive engagement with policymakers from the early stages of research.</p><p><strong>Recommendations: </strong>Future research should prioritize closing the research-to-policy gap by incorporating these strategies to ensure that community air pollution science fully realizes its potential in shaping public health policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10775,"journal":{"name":"Current Environmental Health Reports","volume":"12 1","pages":"17"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Environmental Health Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-025-00483-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Community air pollution science serves as a vital tool in public health and urban planning, enabling communities to advocate for policy changes that improve public health outcomes. Despite its potential, there is a noticeable gap in translating research findings into policy actions.

Objectives: This review aims to assess the focus of studies on community air pollution science published between 1990-2023 and identify the extent to which these studies address the research-to-policy gap.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive review of 131 studies that utilize low-cost sensors for monitoring air pollution. The review specifically looked for how these studies contribute to bridging the research-to-policy gap.

Results: Our findings indicate a significant emphasis on evaluating the performance of low-cost sensors, with 90% of the studies centered on this aspect. Only 10% of the studies explicitly aimed at addressing the research-to-policy gap. Among these, 10 studies employed distinct theories of change to tackle this issue effectively.

Conclusion: There is a critical need for a paradigm shift in community science research to enhance the impact of scientific findings on policy-making. This shift should include strategies such as equitable sensor distribution, a broader focus on regions in the Global South, and proactive engagement with policymakers from the early stages of research.

Recommendations: Future research should prioritize closing the research-to-policy gap by incorporating these strategies to ensure that community air pollution science fully realizes its potential in shaping public health policies.

社区科学在解决政策变化中的作用:对空气污染文献的批判性回顾。
背景:社区空气污染科学是公共卫生和城市规划的重要工具,使社区能够倡导改善公共卫生成果的政策变革。尽管具有潜力,但在将研究成果转化为政策行动方面存在明显差距。目的:本综述旨在评估1990-2023年间发表的社区空气污染科学研究的重点,并确定这些研究在多大程度上解决了研究与政策之间的差距。方法:我们对131项利用低成本传感器监测空气污染的研究进行了全面回顾。该综述特别探讨了这些研究如何有助于弥合研究与政策之间的差距。结果:我们的研究结果表明,评估低成本传感器的性能非常重要,90%的研究都集中在这方面。只有10%的研究明确旨在解决研究与政策之间的差距。其中,有10项研究采用了不同的变化理论来有效地解决这一问题。结论:社区科学研究迫切需要范式转变,以增强科学发现对政策制定的影响。这一转变应该包括诸如公平分配传感器、更广泛地关注全球南方地区以及从研究的早期阶段就与政策制定者积极接触等战略。建议:未来的研究应优先考虑缩小研究与政策之间的差距,将这些战略纳入其中,以确保社区空气污染科学充分发挥其在制定公共卫生政策方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
1.30%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Current Environmental Health Reports provides up-to-date expert reviews in environmental health. The goal is to evaluate and synthesize original research in all disciplines relevant for environmental health sciences, including basic research, clinical research, epidemiology, and environmental policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信