Inclusion of Racially and Ethnically Diverse Samples in Cognitive Rehabilitation Research: An Ethnographic Study of Recruitment and Retention Practices.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Jessica Kersey, Christian Le, Emily Evans, Zaccheus J Ahonle, Patricia Garcia, Anthony H Lequerica, Devina Kumar, Devan Parrott
{"title":"Inclusion of Racially and Ethnically Diverse Samples in Cognitive Rehabilitation Research: An Ethnographic Study of Recruitment and Retention Practices.","authors":"Jessica Kersey, Christian Le, Emily Evans, Zaccheus J Ahonle, Patricia Garcia, Anthony H Lequerica, Devina Kumar, Devan Parrott","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.03.043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the recruitment and retention practices of brain injury rehabilitation researchers and factors affecting the inclusion of racially and ethnically diverse research participants.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Ethnographic study using surveys and qualitative interviews.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Virtual.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Eleven investigators who published cognitive rehabilitation intervention studies.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>N/A MAIN OUTCOMES: Participants completed a survey describing strategies that have shown promise for the recruitment and retention of diverse participants. They then completed a qualitative interview to describe their priorities, the perceived effectiveness of their practices, and the challenges to recruiting representative samples. Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Investigators reported moderate confidence in their knowledge of promising recruitment strategies but low confidence in implementing those strategies. Qualitative themes were 1) balancing competing recruitment and retention priorities, 2) building relationships with participants and communities, and 3) research infrastructure and policies. Key factors influencing recruitment and retention practices included research study and research team characteristics, institutional infrastructure and policies, local contextual factors, and national academic community infrastructure and norms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Brain injury rehabilitation research faces significant challenges in achieving representation of racially and ethnically diverse participants. Systemic changes are needed at the study, institutional, and national levels to support more equitable clinical trial enrollment and reduce health disparities for marginalized brain injury survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2025.03.043","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe the recruitment and retention practices of brain injury rehabilitation researchers and factors affecting the inclusion of racially and ethnically diverse research participants.

Design: Ethnographic study using surveys and qualitative interviews.

Setting: Virtual.

Participants: Eleven investigators who published cognitive rehabilitation intervention studies.

Interventions: N/A MAIN OUTCOMES: Participants completed a survey describing strategies that have shown promise for the recruitment and retention of diverse participants. They then completed a qualitative interview to describe their priorities, the perceived effectiveness of their practices, and the challenges to recruiting representative samples. Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: Investigators reported moderate confidence in their knowledge of promising recruitment strategies but low confidence in implementing those strategies. Qualitative themes were 1) balancing competing recruitment and retention priorities, 2) building relationships with participants and communities, and 3) research infrastructure and policies. Key factors influencing recruitment and retention practices included research study and research team characteristics, institutional infrastructure and policies, local contextual factors, and national academic community infrastructure and norms.

Conclusions: Brain injury rehabilitation research faces significant challenges in achieving representation of racially and ethnically diverse participants. Systemic changes are needed at the study, institutional, and national levels to support more equitable clinical trial enrollment and reduce health disparities for marginalized brain injury survivors.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信