Overall and Cause-Specific Mortality in Patients with Barrett's Esophagus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Population-Based Studies.

IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Tarek Sawas, Alex R Jones, Rand Alsawas, Rachna Talluri, Hayley Rogers, Olgert Bardhi, David Spezia-Lindner, Danielle Gerberi, Siddharth Singh, M Hassan Murad, Nicholas J Shaheen, David A Katzka, Sachin Wani
{"title":"Overall and Cause-Specific Mortality in Patients with Barrett's Esophagus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Population-Based Studies.","authors":"Tarek Sawas, Alex R Jones, Rand Alsawas, Rachna Talluri, Hayley Rogers, Olgert Bardhi, David Spezia-Lindner, Danielle Gerberi, Siddharth Singh, M Hassan Murad, Nicholas J Shaheen, David A Katzka, Sachin Wani","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current guidelines recommend endoscopic surveillance of Barrett's esophagus (BE), but do not account for competing mortality unrelated to esophageal cancer (EC). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate EC and non-EC mortality risk in BE patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We searched multiple databases for studies reporting mortality in BE. We included population-based studies providing standardized mortality ratio (SMR). The primary outcome was SMR from all causes, EC and non-EC etiologies. SMR was calculated by dividing the observed mortality over the expected mortality. Logarithmic form of SMRs were pooled using random effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search yielded 2826 articles, of which 7 studies (n=34,454) were included. All-cause mortality was elevated in BE patients compared to population controls [pooled SMR 1.24 (95% CI:1.01 - 1.53)] driven in part by increased EC mortality risk [SMR 8.98 (95 CI:5.12-15.77)]. The mortality risk was still increased but attenuated after excluding EC mortality [SMR:1.21 (95% CI:1-1.46)]. There was no increased mortality risk for non-EC malignancies [SMR:1.22 (95% CI:0.82-1.82)] or mortality due to non-cancer etiologies [SMR:1.13 (95% CI:0.90 - 1.43)]. Death due to cardiovascular diseases was higher in BE [SMR:1.16 (95% CI:1.02-1.33)]. BE patients were 10 times more likely to die from non-cancer etiologies than EC [RR: 10.71 (95% CI: 5.98 - 19.16)]. Subgroup analysis of studies that excluded prevalent EC at baseline (3 studies) also showed increased all-cause [SMR: 1.12 (95% CI: 1.07 - 1.18) and EC mortality [SMR 4.7 (95% CI: 3.58 - 6.17)] among BE patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BE patients exhibit a higher all-cause mortality, driven in part by risk of EC mortality. A personalized approach to surveillance, mitigating risk of EC while recognizing the broader mortality risks, is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003456","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current guidelines recommend endoscopic surveillance of Barrett's esophagus (BE), but do not account for competing mortality unrelated to esophageal cancer (EC). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate EC and non-EC mortality risk in BE patients.

Method: We searched multiple databases for studies reporting mortality in BE. We included population-based studies providing standardized mortality ratio (SMR). The primary outcome was SMR from all causes, EC and non-EC etiologies. SMR was calculated by dividing the observed mortality over the expected mortality. Logarithmic form of SMRs were pooled using random effects model.

Results: Our search yielded 2826 articles, of which 7 studies (n=34,454) were included. All-cause mortality was elevated in BE patients compared to population controls [pooled SMR 1.24 (95% CI:1.01 - 1.53)] driven in part by increased EC mortality risk [SMR 8.98 (95 CI:5.12-15.77)]. The mortality risk was still increased but attenuated after excluding EC mortality [SMR:1.21 (95% CI:1-1.46)]. There was no increased mortality risk for non-EC malignancies [SMR:1.22 (95% CI:0.82-1.82)] or mortality due to non-cancer etiologies [SMR:1.13 (95% CI:0.90 - 1.43)]. Death due to cardiovascular diseases was higher in BE [SMR:1.16 (95% CI:1.02-1.33)]. BE patients were 10 times more likely to die from non-cancer etiologies than EC [RR: 10.71 (95% CI: 5.98 - 19.16)]. Subgroup analysis of studies that excluded prevalent EC at baseline (3 studies) also showed increased all-cause [SMR: 1.12 (95% CI: 1.07 - 1.18) and EC mortality [SMR 4.7 (95% CI: 3.58 - 6.17)] among BE patients.

Conclusion: BE patients exhibit a higher all-cause mortality, driven in part by risk of EC mortality. A personalized approach to surveillance, mitigating risk of EC while recognizing the broader mortality risks, is warranted.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Gastroenterology
American Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), The American Journal of Gastroenterology (AJG) stands as the foremost clinical journal in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology. AJG offers practical and professional support to clinicians addressing the most prevalent gastroenterological disorders in patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信