Tarek Sawas, Alex R Jones, Rand Alsawas, Rachna Talluri, Hayley Rogers, Olgert Bardhi, David Spezia-Lindner, Danielle Gerberi, Siddharth Singh, M Hassan Murad, Nicholas J Shaheen, David A Katzka, Sachin Wani
{"title":"Overall and Cause-Specific Mortality in Patients with Barrett's Esophagus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Population-Based Studies.","authors":"Tarek Sawas, Alex R Jones, Rand Alsawas, Rachna Talluri, Hayley Rogers, Olgert Bardhi, David Spezia-Lindner, Danielle Gerberi, Siddharth Singh, M Hassan Murad, Nicholas J Shaheen, David A Katzka, Sachin Wani","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current guidelines recommend endoscopic surveillance of Barrett's esophagus (BE), but do not account for competing mortality unrelated to esophageal cancer (EC). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate EC and non-EC mortality risk in BE patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We searched multiple databases for studies reporting mortality in BE. We included population-based studies providing standardized mortality ratio (SMR). The primary outcome was SMR from all causes, EC and non-EC etiologies. SMR was calculated by dividing the observed mortality over the expected mortality. Logarithmic form of SMRs were pooled using random effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search yielded 2826 articles, of which 7 studies (n=34,454) were included. All-cause mortality was elevated in BE patients compared to population controls [pooled SMR 1.24 (95% CI:1.01 - 1.53)] driven in part by increased EC mortality risk [SMR 8.98 (95 CI:5.12-15.77)]. The mortality risk was still increased but attenuated after excluding EC mortality [SMR:1.21 (95% CI:1-1.46)]. There was no increased mortality risk for non-EC malignancies [SMR:1.22 (95% CI:0.82-1.82)] or mortality due to non-cancer etiologies [SMR:1.13 (95% CI:0.90 - 1.43)]. Death due to cardiovascular diseases was higher in BE [SMR:1.16 (95% CI:1.02-1.33)]. BE patients were 10 times more likely to die from non-cancer etiologies than EC [RR: 10.71 (95% CI: 5.98 - 19.16)]. Subgroup analysis of studies that excluded prevalent EC at baseline (3 studies) also showed increased all-cause [SMR: 1.12 (95% CI: 1.07 - 1.18) and EC mortality [SMR 4.7 (95% CI: 3.58 - 6.17)] among BE patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BE patients exhibit a higher all-cause mortality, driven in part by risk of EC mortality. A personalized approach to surveillance, mitigating risk of EC while recognizing the broader mortality risks, is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003456","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Current guidelines recommend endoscopic surveillance of Barrett's esophagus (BE), but do not account for competing mortality unrelated to esophageal cancer (EC). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate EC and non-EC mortality risk in BE patients.
Method: We searched multiple databases for studies reporting mortality in BE. We included population-based studies providing standardized mortality ratio (SMR). The primary outcome was SMR from all causes, EC and non-EC etiologies. SMR was calculated by dividing the observed mortality over the expected mortality. Logarithmic form of SMRs were pooled using random effects model.
Results: Our search yielded 2826 articles, of which 7 studies (n=34,454) were included. All-cause mortality was elevated in BE patients compared to population controls [pooled SMR 1.24 (95% CI:1.01 - 1.53)] driven in part by increased EC mortality risk [SMR 8.98 (95 CI:5.12-15.77)]. The mortality risk was still increased but attenuated after excluding EC mortality [SMR:1.21 (95% CI:1-1.46)]. There was no increased mortality risk for non-EC malignancies [SMR:1.22 (95% CI:0.82-1.82)] or mortality due to non-cancer etiologies [SMR:1.13 (95% CI:0.90 - 1.43)]. Death due to cardiovascular diseases was higher in BE [SMR:1.16 (95% CI:1.02-1.33)]. BE patients were 10 times more likely to die from non-cancer etiologies than EC [RR: 10.71 (95% CI: 5.98 - 19.16)]. Subgroup analysis of studies that excluded prevalent EC at baseline (3 studies) also showed increased all-cause [SMR: 1.12 (95% CI: 1.07 - 1.18) and EC mortality [SMR 4.7 (95% CI: 3.58 - 6.17)] among BE patients.
Conclusion: BE patients exhibit a higher all-cause mortality, driven in part by risk of EC mortality. A personalized approach to surveillance, mitigating risk of EC while recognizing the broader mortality risks, is warranted.
期刊介绍:
Published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), The American Journal of Gastroenterology (AJG) stands as the foremost clinical journal in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology. AJG offers practical and professional support to clinicians addressing the most prevalent gastroenterological disorders in patients.