Júlia Opolski Nunes da Silva, Rodrigo Ribeiro E Silva, Paulo Victor Zattar Ribeiro, Patrícia Silva Farah, Raquel Bissacotti Steglich
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in patients with moderate-to-severe bullous pemphigoid: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Júlia Opolski Nunes da Silva, Rodrigo Ribeiro E Silva, Paulo Victor Zattar Ribeiro, Patrícia Silva Farah, Raquel Bissacotti Steglich","doi":"10.1016/j.abd.2024.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate the safety and efficacy of dupilumab in treating moderate-to-severe bullous pemphigoid.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies of Dupilumab combined with corticosteroids and conventional corticosteroid therapy alone in patients with moderate-to-severe bullous pemphigoid. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched for studies published up to December 2023. Data were extracted from published reports and quality assessment was performed according to Cochrane recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of four studies involving 127 patients were included, of which 53 received Dupilumab combined with corticosteroids, while the other 74 were administered corticosteroids alone. Regarding efficacy, Dupilumab the time before new blister formation stopped (MD = -5.13 days; 95% CI -7.12 to -3.15; p < 0.0001) and demonstrated a greater reduction in Bullous Pemphigoid Disease Area Index (MD = -3.90; 95% CI -5.52 to -2.27; p < 0.0001) and Numeric Rating Scale for Pruritus (SMD = -1.37; 95% CI -2.02 to -0.72; p < 0.0001) compared with patients who received conventional therapy. However safety endpoints, adverse events (RR = 0.78; 95% CI 0.58 to 1.05; p = 0.10) and relapses (RR = 0.50; 95% CI 0.19 to 1.36; p = 0.17) showed no significance. The main limitations were retrospective studies with small samples and limited results in clinical practice and a moderate overall risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with conventional therapy, Dupilumab decreased the time before new blister formation stopped in 5.13 days, as well as Disease Area Index and Pruritus, without interfering with adverse events and relapse.</p>","PeriodicalId":7787,"journal":{"name":"Anais brasileiros de dermatologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anais brasileiros de dermatologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abd.2024.08.008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Evaluate the safety and efficacy of dupilumab in treating moderate-to-severe bullous pemphigoid.
Methods: The authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies of Dupilumab combined with corticosteroids and conventional corticosteroid therapy alone in patients with moderate-to-severe bullous pemphigoid. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched for studies published up to December 2023. Data were extracted from published reports and quality assessment was performed according to Cochrane recommendations.
Results: A total of four studies involving 127 patients were included, of which 53 received Dupilumab combined with corticosteroids, while the other 74 were administered corticosteroids alone. Regarding efficacy, Dupilumab the time before new blister formation stopped (MD = -5.13 days; 95% CI -7.12 to -3.15; p < 0.0001) and demonstrated a greater reduction in Bullous Pemphigoid Disease Area Index (MD = -3.90; 95% CI -5.52 to -2.27; p < 0.0001) and Numeric Rating Scale for Pruritus (SMD = -1.37; 95% CI -2.02 to -0.72; p < 0.0001) compared with patients who received conventional therapy. However safety endpoints, adverse events (RR = 0.78; 95% CI 0.58 to 1.05; p = 0.10) and relapses (RR = 0.50; 95% CI 0.19 to 1.36; p = 0.17) showed no significance. The main limitations were retrospective studies with small samples and limited results in clinical practice and a moderate overall risk of bias.
Conclusion: Compared with conventional therapy, Dupilumab decreased the time before new blister formation stopped in 5.13 days, as well as Disease Area Index and Pruritus, without interfering with adverse events and relapse.
期刊介绍:
The journal is published bimonthly and is devoted to the dissemination of original, unpublished technical-scientific study, resulting from research or reviews of dermatological topics and related matters. Exchanges with other publications may be accepted.