Kate Best, Farag Shuweihdi, Juan Carlos Bazo Alvarez, Samuel Relton, Christina Avgerinou, Danielle Nimmons, Irene Petersen, Maria Pujades-Rodriguez, Simon Paul Conroy, Kate Walters, Robert M West, Andrew Clegg
{"title":"Development and external validation of the electronic frailty index 2 using routine primary care electronic health record data.","authors":"Kate Best, Farag Shuweihdi, Juan Carlos Bazo Alvarez, Samuel Relton, Christina Avgerinou, Danielle Nimmons, Irene Petersen, Maria Pujades-Rodriguez, Simon Paul Conroy, Kate Walters, Robert M West, Andrew Clegg","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afaf077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The electronic frailty index (eFI) is nationally implemented into UK primary care electronic health record systems to support routine identification of frailty. The original eFI has some limitations such as equal weighting of deficit variables, lack of time constraints on variables known to resolve and definition of frailty category cut-points. We have developed and externally validated the eFI2 prediction model to predict the composite risk of home care package; hospital admission for fall/fracture; care home admission; or mortality within one year, addressing the limitations of the original eFI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Linked primary, secondary and social care data from two independent retrospective cohorts of adults aged ≥65 in 2018 was used; the population of Bradford using the Connected Bradford dataset (development cohort, 78 760 patients) and the population of Wales, from the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage databank (external validation cohort, 660 417 patients). Candidate predictors included the original eFI variables, supplemented with variables informed by literature reviews and clinical expertise. The composite outcome was modelled using Cox regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In internal validation the model had excellent discrimination (C-index = 0.803, Nagelkerke's R2 = 0.0971) with good calibration (Calibration slope = 1.00). In external validation, the model had good discrimination (C-index = 0.723, Nagelkerke's R2 = 0.064), with some evidence of miscalibration (Calibration slope = 1.104).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The eFI2 demonstrates robust prediction for key frailty-related outcomes, improving on the original eFI. Our use of novel methodology to develop and validate the eFI2 will advance the field of frailty-related research internationally, setting a new methodological standard.</p>","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"54 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11957239/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf077","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The electronic frailty index (eFI) is nationally implemented into UK primary care electronic health record systems to support routine identification of frailty. The original eFI has some limitations such as equal weighting of deficit variables, lack of time constraints on variables known to resolve and definition of frailty category cut-points. We have developed and externally validated the eFI2 prediction model to predict the composite risk of home care package; hospital admission for fall/fracture; care home admission; or mortality within one year, addressing the limitations of the original eFI.
Methods: Linked primary, secondary and social care data from two independent retrospective cohorts of adults aged ≥65 in 2018 was used; the population of Bradford using the Connected Bradford dataset (development cohort, 78 760 patients) and the population of Wales, from the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage databank (external validation cohort, 660 417 patients). Candidate predictors included the original eFI variables, supplemented with variables informed by literature reviews and clinical expertise. The composite outcome was modelled using Cox regression.
Results: In internal validation the model had excellent discrimination (C-index = 0.803, Nagelkerke's R2 = 0.0971) with good calibration (Calibration slope = 1.00). In external validation, the model had good discrimination (C-index = 0.723, Nagelkerke's R2 = 0.064), with some evidence of miscalibration (Calibration slope = 1.104).
Conclusions: The eFI2 demonstrates robust prediction for key frailty-related outcomes, improving on the original eFI. Our use of novel methodology to develop and validate the eFI2 will advance the field of frailty-related research internationally, setting a new methodological standard.
期刊介绍:
Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.