Impact of levator ani muscle avulsions on Manchester procedure outcomes: A 5-year follow-up study.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Sissel Hegdahl Oversand, Anne Cathrine Staff, Ingrid Volløyhaug, Rune Svenningsen
{"title":"Impact of levator ani muscle avulsions on Manchester procedure outcomes: A 5-year follow-up study.","authors":"Sissel Hegdahl Oversand, Anne Cathrine Staff, Ingrid Volløyhaug, Rune Svenningsen","doi":"10.1111/aogs.15102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Levator ani muscle avulsion is a risk factor for inferior outcomes after native tissue pelvic organ prolapse repair. In a previously published study, we found no such association 1 year after the Manchester procedure (anterior repair combined with cardinal and uterosacral ligament suspension and perineal repair). The aim of the present study was to compare women with and without levator ani muscle avulsions in terms of patient-reported and anatomical outcomes, and failure rates in the same cohort after 5 years.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Five-year prospective cohort study of 143 women operated on for anterior and/or mid-compartment pelvic organ prolapse with the Manchester procedure between October 2014 and January 2017, Clinical Trial study number NCT02246387. Levator ani muscle avulsions (uni- or bilateral) were diagnosed at inclusion by transperineal ultrasound. Primary outcome at 5-year follow-up was subjective bulge symptoms (question 3, Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20). Secondary outcomes were total score from the same questionnaire, sexual distress (Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-12), subjective cure, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification scale measurements, defining optimal outcomes as anterior compartment stage <0-1 and mid-compartment point C ≤-5, and new surgical or conservative prolapse treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 143 women followed up after 5 years, the avulsion rate was 52.4%. Both groups showed similar reductions in bulge symptoms, pelvic floor symptoms, and anatomical anterior- and mid-compartment measurements. Sexual distress improvement was significantly greater for women with avulsion (Mean change difference: -3.4 (-6.4 to -0.5)). Multivariate regression revealed no significant effect of avulsion on symptom scores, cure rates, or need for new prolapse treatment. Women with avulsion had half the odds of obtaining an optimal anterior compartment outcome compared to those without avulsion (adjusted odds ratio: 0.5 (0.2-0.9)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although women with levator ani muscle avulsion had lower odds of achieving an optimal anterior compartment outcome, the overall anatomical changes from preoperative to 5 years were similar in both groups. Importantly, avulsion did not impact symptom improvement, patient-reported outcomes, or the need for further treatment. These findings support the Manchester procedure as an effective and durable surgical option for women with POP, regardless of avulsion status.</p>","PeriodicalId":6990,"journal":{"name":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.15102","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Levator ani muscle avulsion is a risk factor for inferior outcomes after native tissue pelvic organ prolapse repair. In a previously published study, we found no such association 1 year after the Manchester procedure (anterior repair combined with cardinal and uterosacral ligament suspension and perineal repair). The aim of the present study was to compare women with and without levator ani muscle avulsions in terms of patient-reported and anatomical outcomes, and failure rates in the same cohort after 5 years.

Material and methods: Five-year prospective cohort study of 143 women operated on for anterior and/or mid-compartment pelvic organ prolapse with the Manchester procedure between October 2014 and January 2017, Clinical Trial study number NCT02246387. Levator ani muscle avulsions (uni- or bilateral) were diagnosed at inclusion by transperineal ultrasound. Primary outcome at 5-year follow-up was subjective bulge symptoms (question 3, Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20). Secondary outcomes were total score from the same questionnaire, sexual distress (Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-12), subjective cure, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification scale measurements, defining optimal outcomes as anterior compartment stage <0-1 and mid-compartment point C ≤-5, and new surgical or conservative prolapse treatment.

Results: Among 143 women followed up after 5 years, the avulsion rate was 52.4%. Both groups showed similar reductions in bulge symptoms, pelvic floor symptoms, and anatomical anterior- and mid-compartment measurements. Sexual distress improvement was significantly greater for women with avulsion (Mean change difference: -3.4 (-6.4 to -0.5)). Multivariate regression revealed no significant effect of avulsion on symptom scores, cure rates, or need for new prolapse treatment. Women with avulsion had half the odds of obtaining an optimal anterior compartment outcome compared to those without avulsion (adjusted odds ratio: 0.5 (0.2-0.9)).

Conclusions: Although women with levator ani muscle avulsion had lower odds of achieving an optimal anterior compartment outcome, the overall anatomical changes from preoperative to 5 years were similar in both groups. Importantly, avulsion did not impact symptom improvement, patient-reported outcomes, or the need for further treatment. These findings support the Manchester procedure as an effective and durable surgical option for women with POP, regardless of avulsion status.

提肛肌撕脱对曼彻斯特手术结果的影响:一项5年随访研究。
摘要提肛肌撕脱是盆腔器官脱垂修复术后预后较差的危险因素。在先前发表的一项研究中,我们发现曼彻斯特手术(前路修复联合枢机和子宫骶韧带悬吊和会阴修复)1年后没有这种关联。本研究的目的是比较5年后同一队列中有和没有提肛肌撕脱的女性在患者报告和解剖结果以及失败率方面的差异。材料和方法:2014年10月至2017年1月期间,143名接受曼彻斯特手术治疗前腔和/或中腔盆腔器官脱垂的女性,为期5年的前瞻性队列研究,临床试验研究编号NCT02246387。提肛肌撕脱(单侧或双侧)被诊断为包括经会阴超声。5年随访的主要结局是主观肿胀症状(问题3,骨盆底窘迫量表-20)。次要结局为同一问卷的总分、性困扰(盆腔器官脱垂/尿失禁性问卷-12)、主观治愈、盆腔器官脱垂量化量表测量,将最佳结局定义为前房室分期。结果:随访5年后,143名妇女的撕脱率为52.4%。两组在肿胀症状、盆底症状和前腔室和中腔室解剖测量方面均有相似的减轻。撕脱伤女性的性痛苦改善明显更大(平均变化差:-3.4(-6.4至-0.5))。多因素回归显示撕脱术对症状评分、治愈率或需要新的脱垂治疗没有显著影响。与没有撕脱的女性相比,有撕脱的女性获得最佳前室结果的几率只有一半(调整后的优势比:0.5(0.2-0.9))。结论:尽管女性提肛肌撕脱术获得最佳前室结果的几率较低,但两组患者术前至5年的整体解剖变化相似。重要的是,撕脱不影响症状改善、患者报告的结果或进一步治疗的需要。这些发现支持曼彻斯特手术作为一种有效和持久的手术选择,对于女性的POP,无论撕脱状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
180
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Published monthly, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica is an international journal dedicated to providing the very latest information on the results of both clinical, basic and translational research work related to all aspects of women’s health from around the globe. The journal regularly publishes commentaries, reviews, and original articles on a wide variety of topics including: gynecology, pregnancy, birth, female urology, gynecologic oncology, fertility and reproductive biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信