Deciphering the Synergies between Carbon Tax and Water Conservation: A Water Footprint Analysis.

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Lan Mu, Renjie Ma, Chuanzhen Zhang, Xuanwen Zeng, Qi Zhou
{"title":"Deciphering the Synergies between Carbon Tax and Water Conservation: A Water Footprint Analysis.","authors":"Lan Mu, Renjie Ma, Chuanzhen Zhang, Xuanwen Zeng, Qi Zhou","doi":"10.1007/s00267-025-02153-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Water poverty poses significant challenges to regional environmental conservation and socioeconomic development, with water footprints providing valuable insights into assessing the severity of this poverty. A carbon tax, an environmental charge imposed on the carbon emissions from energy sources, is known for quickly reducing emissions at minimal public expense, and can indirectly influence water footprints. While past research has detailed the previous characteristics of water footprints, it has not yet predicted how these characteristics might evolve under the influence of a carbon tax. In this paper, variations in the water footprint are examined using an input-output model, and the impacts of carbon taxes on water footprints are forecasted through a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model. CGE models are essential for low-carbon policy design, enabling policymakers to simulate the socioeconomic and environmental impacts of interventions, thereby offering insights to refine integrated strategies for emissions reduction and water footprint efficiency. The simulation results indicated in the case of imposing carbon tax simulation, the coal industry experienced the largest reduction in virtual water content at 34.81%, followed by heavy industry and transport. Additionally, the carbon tax has a more pronounced effect on virtual water content in secondary industries compared to primary and tertiary industries. With carbon taxes set at 100 and 200, the total water footprint decreased by 3.15% and 4.72%, respectively, which corresponds to a reduction in water usage per person in China by 3.2% and 4.8%. Furthermore, the simulation also suggested that social welfare reached its maximum value of 181.36 when the carbon tax was 196 RMB/t-CO<sub>2</sub>. Our research also provides a new point of view on assessing the effectiveness and fairness of carbon taxes and can further be used to develop compensation strategies that tackle emission and water limitations in the energy sector, thereby optimizing the benefits for water conservation that arise from emission reduction measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":543,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-025-02153-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Water poverty poses significant challenges to regional environmental conservation and socioeconomic development, with water footprints providing valuable insights into assessing the severity of this poverty. A carbon tax, an environmental charge imposed on the carbon emissions from energy sources, is known for quickly reducing emissions at minimal public expense, and can indirectly influence water footprints. While past research has detailed the previous characteristics of water footprints, it has not yet predicted how these characteristics might evolve under the influence of a carbon tax. In this paper, variations in the water footprint are examined using an input-output model, and the impacts of carbon taxes on water footprints are forecasted through a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model. CGE models are essential for low-carbon policy design, enabling policymakers to simulate the socioeconomic and environmental impacts of interventions, thereby offering insights to refine integrated strategies for emissions reduction and water footprint efficiency. The simulation results indicated in the case of imposing carbon tax simulation, the coal industry experienced the largest reduction in virtual water content at 34.81%, followed by heavy industry and transport. Additionally, the carbon tax has a more pronounced effect on virtual water content in secondary industries compared to primary and tertiary industries. With carbon taxes set at 100 and 200, the total water footprint decreased by 3.15% and 4.72%, respectively, which corresponds to a reduction in water usage per person in China by 3.2% and 4.8%. Furthermore, the simulation also suggested that social welfare reached its maximum value of 181.36 when the carbon tax was 196 RMB/t-CO2. Our research also provides a new point of view on assessing the effectiveness and fairness of carbon taxes and can further be used to develop compensation strategies that tackle emission and water limitations in the energy sector, thereby optimizing the benefits for water conservation that arise from emission reduction measures.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Management
Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Management offers research and opinions on use and conservation of natural resources, protection of habitats and control of hazards, spanning the field of environmental management without regard to traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal aims to improve communication, making ideas and results from any field available to practitioners from other backgrounds. Contributions are drawn from biology, botany, chemistry, climatology, ecology, ecological economics, environmental engineering, fisheries, environmental law, forest sciences, geosciences, information science, public affairs, public health, toxicology, zoology and more. As the principal user of nature, humanity is responsible for ensuring that its environmental impacts are benign rather than catastrophic. Environmental Management presents the work of academic researchers and professionals outside universities, including those in business, government, research establishments, and public interest groups, presenting a wide spectrum of viewpoints and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信