Farm revegetation has substantial potential to improve biodiversity outcomes.

IF 8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Karel Mokany, Hugh M Burley, Chris Ware, Katherine M Giljohann, Anthony P O'Grady, Karen M Christie-Whitehead, Matthew T Harrison
{"title":"Farm revegetation has substantial potential to improve biodiversity outcomes.","authors":"Karel Mokany, Hugh M Burley, Chris Ware, Katherine M Giljohann, Anthony P O'Grady, Karen M Christie-Whitehead, Matthew T Harrison","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Agricultural expansion and intensification has caused habitat loss, contributing to the current biodiversity crisis. Reliable, efficient and consistent information at the farm-scale is critical to understand the magnitude of recent changes in biodiversity and to inform future management actions aimed at reversing historical declines. We apply a habitat-based biodiversity assessment approach to examine the potential for grazing farms across Australia to improve outcomes for biodiversity by revegetating 10 % of the farm area. Fourteen case-study farms distributed across Australia with diverse attributes were assessed, including an analysis of likely benefits for biodiversity 30 years after commencing a hypothetical revegetation scenario, within the context of estimates of recent historical changes. From 2004 to 2020, the three biodiversity indicators considered decreased for the majority of farms. The scenario for revegetating 10 % of the farm area was estimated to substantially increase the biodiversity indicators, with half of the farms estimated to achieve recovery for all 3 indicators to greater than 2004 levels by 2050. Smaller farms with lower average ecosystem condition in 2020 were estimated to achieve the greatest gains in biodiversity from the revegetation scenario, relative to their indicator values in 2020. Farm revegetation actions have substantial potential to improve outcomes for biodiversity, though such gains may be difficult and time consuming to achieve, emphasising the importance of avoiding further habitat loss through removal or degradation of native vegetation.</p>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"380 ","pages":"125174"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125174","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agricultural expansion and intensification has caused habitat loss, contributing to the current biodiversity crisis. Reliable, efficient and consistent information at the farm-scale is critical to understand the magnitude of recent changes in biodiversity and to inform future management actions aimed at reversing historical declines. We apply a habitat-based biodiversity assessment approach to examine the potential for grazing farms across Australia to improve outcomes for biodiversity by revegetating 10 % of the farm area. Fourteen case-study farms distributed across Australia with diverse attributes were assessed, including an analysis of likely benefits for biodiversity 30 years after commencing a hypothetical revegetation scenario, within the context of estimates of recent historical changes. From 2004 to 2020, the three biodiversity indicators considered decreased for the majority of farms. The scenario for revegetating 10 % of the farm area was estimated to substantially increase the biodiversity indicators, with half of the farms estimated to achieve recovery for all 3 indicators to greater than 2004 levels by 2050. Smaller farms with lower average ecosystem condition in 2020 were estimated to achieve the greatest gains in biodiversity from the revegetation scenario, relative to their indicator values in 2020. Farm revegetation actions have substantial potential to improve outcomes for biodiversity, though such gains may be difficult and time consuming to achieve, emphasising the importance of avoiding further habitat loss through removal or degradation of native vegetation.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信