Implementation of hypertension guidelines by general practitioner societies and the use of single pill combinations in Europe-results of the survey of the general practitioner nucleus of European society of hypertension.

IF 1.8 4区 医学
Blood Pressure Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-03 DOI:10.1080/08037051.2025.2487592
János Nemcsik, Enrique Rodilla, Fabiolucio Albini, Michael Doumas, Jean-Marc Boivin, Helga Gyöngyösi, Reinhold Kreutz, Rosa de Pinho
{"title":"Implementation of hypertension guidelines by general practitioner societies and the use of single pill combinations in Europe-results of the survey of the general practitioner nucleus of European society of hypertension.","authors":"János Nemcsik, Enrique Rodilla, Fabiolucio Albini, Michael Doumas, Jean-Marc Boivin, Helga Gyöngyösi, Reinhold Kreutz, Rosa de Pinho","doi":"10.1080/08037051.2025.2487592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The implementation of hypertension guidelines into the everyday practice of general practitioners (GPs) have an outmost importance to provide optimal care for patients. The aim of our study was, on the one hand to gain insight about the relationship between hypertension societies and GP societies, and on the other hand, to get feedback about the use of single pill combinations (SPC) in each country, as an indicator of guideline implementation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The European Society of Hypertension (ESH) GP Nucleus initiated a survey containing 17 questions about the existence and number of national hypertension and GP societies, the relationship between them and with pharmacists and nurse associations, the authors of national guidelines and the availability of SPCs. The survey was sent to the national hypertension society representatives of ESH. Additionally, data about the number of SPCs sold yearly was also checked using IQVIA database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses were collected from 25 European countries. In most of the countries there is only one hypertension society (23/25) and one GP society (18/25), most of which having a relationship with each other (22/25). Of the countries with national hypertension guidelines most of them are written by the national hypertension society (45%) followed by the GP society (27%) or by public administration (27%). Two thirds of the national hypertension societies (16/25) have relationship with nurse societies and half of them (12/25) with pharmacists. In 65% (15/23) of the guidelines dual SPC therapy is recommended for treatment initiation however, marked differences are present in the number of yearly sold SPCs in different countries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>National hypertension societies have remarkable impact on GPs for the management of hypertensive patients. However, improvement is needed in the collaboration with nurse and pharmacist societies and in some countries in the use of SPCs for hypertension therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9000,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure","volume":" ","pages":"2487592"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Pressure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2025.2487592","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The implementation of hypertension guidelines into the everyday practice of general practitioners (GPs) have an outmost importance to provide optimal care for patients. The aim of our study was, on the one hand to gain insight about the relationship between hypertension societies and GP societies, and on the other hand, to get feedback about the use of single pill combinations (SPC) in each country, as an indicator of guideline implementation.

Materials and methods: The European Society of Hypertension (ESH) GP Nucleus initiated a survey containing 17 questions about the existence and number of national hypertension and GP societies, the relationship between them and with pharmacists and nurse associations, the authors of national guidelines and the availability of SPCs. The survey was sent to the national hypertension society representatives of ESH. Additionally, data about the number of SPCs sold yearly was also checked using IQVIA database.

Results: Responses were collected from 25 European countries. In most of the countries there is only one hypertension society (23/25) and one GP society (18/25), most of which having a relationship with each other (22/25). Of the countries with national hypertension guidelines most of them are written by the national hypertension society (45%) followed by the GP society (27%) or by public administration (27%). Two thirds of the national hypertension societies (16/25) have relationship with nurse societies and half of them (12/25) with pharmacists. In 65% (15/23) of the guidelines dual SPC therapy is recommended for treatment initiation however, marked differences are present in the number of yearly sold SPCs in different countries.

Conclusions: National hypertension societies have remarkable impact on GPs for the management of hypertensive patients. However, improvement is needed in the collaboration with nurse and pharmacist societies and in some countries in the use of SPCs for hypertension therapy.

欧洲全科医生协会高血压指南的实施和单一药物组合的使用——欧洲高血压协会全科医生核心调查的结果。
目的:在全科医生(gp)的日常实践中实施高血压指南对为患者提供最佳护理具有重要意义。我们研究的目的是,一方面了解高血压协会和全科医生协会之间的关系,另一方面,获得关于每个国家使用单药组合(SPC)的反馈,作为指南实施的指标。材料和方法:欧洲高血压学会(ESH) GP核发起了一项调查,包含17个问题,涉及国家高血压和GP协会的存在和数量,它们与药剂师和护士协会的关系,国家指南的作者和SPCs的可用性。该调查已发送给ESH的全国高血压协会代表。此外,还使用IQVIA数据库检查了每年售出的spc数量的数据。结果:收集了来自25个欧洲国家的反馈。在大多数国家,只有一个高血压学会(23/25)和一个全科医生学会(18/25),其中大多数相互之间存在关系(22/25)。在制定国家高血压指南的国家中,大多数指南由国家高血压协会(45%)编写,其次是GP协会(27%)或公共行政部门(27%)编写。全国高血压学会中有2/ 3(16/25)与护士协会有联系,有一半(12/25)与药师协会有联系。65%(15/23)的指南建议在开始治疗时使用双SPC疗法,然而,不同国家的SPC年销售数量存在显著差异。结论:国家高血压学会对全科医生管理高血压患者有显著影响。然而,在与护士和药剂师协会的合作方面,以及在一些国家使用特殊药物治疗高血压方面,还需要改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Blood Pressure
Blood Pressure Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: For outstanding coverage of the latest advances in hypertension research, turn to Blood Pressure, a primary source for authoritative and timely information on all aspects of hypertension research and management. Features include: • Physiology and pathophysiology of blood pressure regulation • Primary and secondary hypertension • Cerebrovascular and cardiovascular complications of hypertension • Detection, treatment and follow-up of hypertension • Non pharmacological and pharmacological management • Large outcome trials in hypertension.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信