Lords of the flies: dipteran migrants are diverse, abundant and ecologically important.

IF 11 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Will L Hawkes, Myles H M Menz, Karl R Wotton
{"title":"Lords of the flies: dipteran migrants are diverse, abundant and ecologically important.","authors":"Will L Hawkes, Myles H M Menz, Karl R Wotton","doi":"10.1111/brv.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Insect migrants are hugely abundant, with recent studies identifying the megadiverse order Diptera as the major component of many migratory assemblages. Despite this, their migratory behaviour has been widely overlooked in favour of more 'charismatic' migrant insects such as butterflies, dragonflies, and moths. Herein we review the available literature on dipteran migration to determine its prevalence, identify key migratory routes and elucidate areas that may prove fruitful for future research. Using 13 lines of evidence to determine migratory behaviour, we determined that species from 60 out of 130 dipteran families show evidence of migration, with Syrphidae fulfilling 12 of these criteria, followed by the Tephritidae with 10. By contrast, 22 families met just two criteria or fewer, underlining the need for more research into the migratory characteristics of these groups. In total, 592 species of Diptera were identified as potentially migratory, making them the most speciose group of insect migrants yet described. Despite this, only 0.5% of dipteran species were found to be migrants, a figure rising to 3% for the Syrphidae, a percentage mirrored by other migratory taxa such as butterflies, noctuid moths, and bats. Research was biased to locations in Europe (49% of publications) and while vast regions remain understudied, our review identified major flyways used by dipteran migrants across all biogeographic realms. Finally, we highlight an unsurpassed level of ecological diversity within dipteran migrants, including ecological roles of huge economic value. Overall, this review highlights how little is known about dipteran migration and how vital their migratory behaviour may be to the health of global ecosystems.</p>","PeriodicalId":133,"journal":{"name":"Biological Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.70017","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Insect migrants are hugely abundant, with recent studies identifying the megadiverse order Diptera as the major component of many migratory assemblages. Despite this, their migratory behaviour has been widely overlooked in favour of more 'charismatic' migrant insects such as butterflies, dragonflies, and moths. Herein we review the available literature on dipteran migration to determine its prevalence, identify key migratory routes and elucidate areas that may prove fruitful for future research. Using 13 lines of evidence to determine migratory behaviour, we determined that species from 60 out of 130 dipteran families show evidence of migration, with Syrphidae fulfilling 12 of these criteria, followed by the Tephritidae with 10. By contrast, 22 families met just two criteria or fewer, underlining the need for more research into the migratory characteristics of these groups. In total, 592 species of Diptera were identified as potentially migratory, making them the most speciose group of insect migrants yet described. Despite this, only 0.5% of dipteran species were found to be migrants, a figure rising to 3% for the Syrphidae, a percentage mirrored by other migratory taxa such as butterflies, noctuid moths, and bats. Research was biased to locations in Europe (49% of publications) and while vast regions remain understudied, our review identified major flyways used by dipteran migrants across all biogeographic realms. Finally, we highlight an unsurpassed level of ecological diversity within dipteran migrants, including ecological roles of huge economic value. Overall, this review highlights how little is known about dipteran migration and how vital their migratory behaviour may be to the health of global ecosystems.

蝇王:双翅类候鸟种类繁多,数量丰富,具有重要的生态意义。
昆虫的迁徙是非常丰富的,最近的研究发现,超级多样化的双翅目是许多迁徙组合的主要组成部分。尽管如此,它们的迁徙行为却被广泛忽视了,人们更倾向于“有魅力”的迁徙昆虫,如蝴蝶、蜻蜓和飞蛾。在此,我们回顾了有关双翅类迁徙的现有文献,以确定其流行程度,确定关键的迁徙路线,并阐明可能为未来研究提供成果的领域。利用13条证据线来确定迁徙行为,我们确定130个双翅目动物科中有60个物种显示出迁徙的证据,其中食蚜科满足其中12个标准,其次是衣蝗科满足10个标准。相比之下,22个家庭只符合两个或更少的标准,强调需要对这些群体的迁移特征进行更多的研究。总共有592种双翅目昆虫被确定为潜在的迁徙昆虫,使它们成为迄今为止描述的物种最多的迁徙昆虫群体。尽管如此,只有0.5%的双翅类物种被发现是迁徙的,而食蚜科的这一数字上升到3%,其他迁徙类群如蝴蝶、夜蛾和蝙蝠也反映了这一比例。研究偏向于欧洲地区(49%的出版物),尽管大片地区仍未得到充分研究,但我们的综述确定了所有生物地理领域双翅类候鸟使用的主要飞行路线。最后,我们强调了双向移民中无与伦比的生态多样性,包括具有巨大经济价值的生态角色。总的来说,这篇综述强调了我们对双翅目动物迁徙知之甚少,以及它们的迁徙行为对全球生态系统的健康可能有多么重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Reviews
Biological Reviews 生物-生物学
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biological Reviews is a scientific journal that covers a wide range of topics in the biological sciences. It publishes several review articles per issue, which are aimed at both non-specialist biologists and researchers in the field. The articles are scholarly and include extensive bibliographies. Authors are instructed to be aware of the diverse readership and write their articles accordingly. The reviews in Biological Reviews serve as comprehensive introductions to specific fields, presenting the current state of the art and highlighting gaps in knowledge. Each article can be up to 20,000 words long and includes an abstract, a thorough introduction, and a statement of conclusions. The journal focuses on publishing synthetic reviews, which are based on existing literature and address important biological questions. These reviews are interesting to a broad readership and are timely, often related to fast-moving fields or new discoveries. A key aspect of a synthetic review is that it goes beyond simply compiling information and instead analyzes the collected data to create a new theoretical or conceptual framework that can significantly impact the field. Biological Reviews is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, AgBiotechNet, AGRICOLA Database, GeoRef, Global Health, SCOPUS, Weed Abstracts, and Reaction Citation Index, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信