Population genomic analysis unravels the evolutionary processes leading to budding speciation.

IF 9.3 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Xiao-Ying Liu, Long Huang, Ya-Peng Yang, Yue-Yi Li, Zi-Wei Ma, Shi-Yu Wang, Lin-Feng Qiu, Qing-Song Liu, Jian-Qiang Zhang
{"title":"Population genomic analysis unravels the evolutionary processes leading to budding speciation.","authors":"Xiao-Ying Liu, Long Huang, Ya-Peng Yang, Yue-Yi Li, Zi-Wei Ma, Shi-Yu Wang, Lin-Feng Qiu, Qing-Song Liu, Jian-Qiang Zhang","doi":"10.1111/jipb.13905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Budding speciation is a process wherein a new species arises from a small, isolated population within or at the margin of an ancestral species. Well-documented cases of budding speciation are rare, and the roles of various evolutionary factors in this process remain controversial. Based on whole-genome resequencing data from 272 individuals across 27 populations, we reconstructed the evolutionary history of Rhodiola sect. Trifida and explored the relative contributions of natural selection, genetic drift, and chromosomal rearrangements as drivers of lineage divergence. We found that all samples of R. chrysanthemifolia (including R. alterna and R. sinuata) were clustered into three clades. Rhodiola liciae was sister to all other samples in the section, likely due to post-divergence gene flow and the minimal population structure of the progenitor species, while it shared the same ancestry with R. ch-I in population structure analyses. The two populations of R. sinuata were not monophyletic, instead clustering with geographically proximate populations of R. ch-III. Demographic analyses revealed that R. liciae underwent a contraction in population size following its divergence from R. ch-I approximately 0.34 million years ago (Mya), and has remained stable since around 0.1 Mya. Genomic islands and genotype-environment association analyses suggested that genetic drift and the assorting of ancestral polymorphism may have played a more significant role in the speciation of R. liciae than nature selection or chromosomal rearrangements. We propose that R. liciae diverged from R. chrysanthemifolia through budding speciation, although post-divergence gene flow has obscured its phylogenetic signal. Additionally, we identified two potential parallel budding speciation events in R. sinuata at an earlier stage than R. liciae. Our study highlights budding speciation as a prevalent yet poorly characterized mode of plant speciation, with assorting of ancestral polymorphism as a key stochastic mechanism in the process.</p>","PeriodicalId":195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative Plant Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrative Plant Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.13905","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Budding speciation is a process wherein a new species arises from a small, isolated population within or at the margin of an ancestral species. Well-documented cases of budding speciation are rare, and the roles of various evolutionary factors in this process remain controversial. Based on whole-genome resequencing data from 272 individuals across 27 populations, we reconstructed the evolutionary history of Rhodiola sect. Trifida and explored the relative contributions of natural selection, genetic drift, and chromosomal rearrangements as drivers of lineage divergence. We found that all samples of R. chrysanthemifolia (including R. alterna and R. sinuata) were clustered into three clades. Rhodiola liciae was sister to all other samples in the section, likely due to post-divergence gene flow and the minimal population structure of the progenitor species, while it shared the same ancestry with R. ch-I in population structure analyses. The two populations of R. sinuata were not monophyletic, instead clustering with geographically proximate populations of R. ch-III. Demographic analyses revealed that R. liciae underwent a contraction in population size following its divergence from R. ch-I approximately 0.34 million years ago (Mya), and has remained stable since around 0.1 Mya. Genomic islands and genotype-environment association analyses suggested that genetic drift and the assorting of ancestral polymorphism may have played a more significant role in the speciation of R. liciae than nature selection or chromosomal rearrangements. We propose that R. liciae diverged from R. chrysanthemifolia through budding speciation, although post-divergence gene flow has obscured its phylogenetic signal. Additionally, we identified two potential parallel budding speciation events in R. sinuata at an earlier stage than R. liciae. Our study highlights budding speciation as a prevalent yet poorly characterized mode of plant speciation, with assorting of ancestral polymorphism as a key stochastic mechanism in the process.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Integrative Plant Biology
Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
18.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
220
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Integrative Plant Biology is a leading academic journal reporting on the latest discoveries in plant biology.Enjoy the latest news and developments in the field, understand new and improved methods and research tools, and explore basic biological questions through reproducible experimental design, using genetic, biochemical, cell and molecular biological methods, and statistical analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信