Minimally Invasive Bilateral Autologous Breast Reconstruction by Double SCIP-SB Free Flap With Internal Mammary Perforator and Rib-Sparing Internal Mammary Anastomoses: A Case Report

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Microsurgery Pub Date : 2025-04-02 DOI:10.1002/micr.70058
Federica Martini, Matteo Meroni, Mario F. Scaglioni
{"title":"Minimally Invasive Bilateral Autologous Breast Reconstruction by Double SCIP-SB Free Flap With Internal Mammary Perforator and Rib-Sparing Internal Mammary Anastomoses: A Case Report","authors":"Federica Martini,&nbsp;Matteo Meroni,&nbsp;Mario F. Scaglioni","doi":"10.1002/micr.70058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Minimizing invasiveness has become a primary goal in autologous breast reconstruction, with a shift toward perforator-based flaps over musculocutaneous flaps to reduce donor site morbidity. The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is considered the gold standard due to its reliable perfusion and high-level esthetic outcomes; however, it requires intramuscular dissection, which might be tedious and carry the risk of abdominal wall weakening. At the recipient site, traditional anastomosis techniques often involve the removal of costal cartilage, contributing to a higher morbidity and discomfort or long-lasting localized pain. A 56-year-old female patient presenting with a recurrent right breast tumor was referred to our department for a bilateral skin-reducing mastectomy and immediate autologous reconstruction. Preoperative imaging revealed small DIEA perforators and the presence of a suitable perforator of the superficial branch of the superficial circumflex iliac artery (SCIP-SB) bilaterally. Intraoperative ICG evaluation confirmed adequate flap perfusion based on the SCIP-SB, allowing for flap harvest based on these vessels without opening the rectus fascia or performing intramuscular dissection. At the recipient site, on the right side, an internal mammary artery perforator was preserved and used for anastomosis, while on the left side, we isolated the internal mammary vessels in a rib-sparing fashion. This approach minimized morbidity at donor and recipient sites, improving postoperative comfort and recovery. The patient reported mild pain and no complications post-surgery and expressed high satisfaction at 6 months. This case highlights how focusing on the reduction of morbidity at different stages of the reconstructive procedure may allow obtaining better patient-centered outcomes. In this perspective, the SCIP-SB flap represents a viable, minimally invasive option, expanding the possible reconstructive choices in autologous breast reconstruction.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18600,"journal":{"name":"Microsurgery","volume":"45 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/micr.70058","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Minimizing invasiveness has become a primary goal in autologous breast reconstruction, with a shift toward perforator-based flaps over musculocutaneous flaps to reduce donor site morbidity. The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is considered the gold standard due to its reliable perfusion and high-level esthetic outcomes; however, it requires intramuscular dissection, which might be tedious and carry the risk of abdominal wall weakening. At the recipient site, traditional anastomosis techniques often involve the removal of costal cartilage, contributing to a higher morbidity and discomfort or long-lasting localized pain. A 56-year-old female patient presenting with a recurrent right breast tumor was referred to our department for a bilateral skin-reducing mastectomy and immediate autologous reconstruction. Preoperative imaging revealed small DIEA perforators and the presence of a suitable perforator of the superficial branch of the superficial circumflex iliac artery (SCIP-SB) bilaterally. Intraoperative ICG evaluation confirmed adequate flap perfusion based on the SCIP-SB, allowing for flap harvest based on these vessels without opening the rectus fascia or performing intramuscular dissection. At the recipient site, on the right side, an internal mammary artery perforator was preserved and used for anastomosis, while on the left side, we isolated the internal mammary vessels in a rib-sparing fashion. This approach minimized morbidity at donor and recipient sites, improving postoperative comfort and recovery. The patient reported mild pain and no complications post-surgery and expressed high satisfaction at 6 months. This case highlights how focusing on the reduction of morbidity at different stages of the reconstructive procedure may allow obtaining better patient-centered outcomes. In this perspective, the SCIP-SB flap represents a viable, minimally invasive option, expanding the possible reconstructive choices in autologous breast reconstruction.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microsurgery
Microsurgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
19.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Microsurgery is an international and interdisciplinary publication of original contributions concerning surgery under microscopic magnification. Microsurgery publishes clinical studies, research papers, invited articles, relevant reviews, and other scholarly works from all related fields including orthopaedic surgery, otolaryngology, pediatric surgery, plastic surgery, urology, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信