Quality of Life and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Osteosarcoma: A Systematic Review

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ana Sebio, Claire Berger, Marie-Dominique Tabone, Natalia Fernandez, Faustine Tardy, Martha Grootenhuis, Emanuela Palmerini, Nathalie Gaspar, Michiel van de Sande, Lianne M. Haveman, The FOSTER Consortium
{"title":"Quality of Life and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Osteosarcoma: A Systematic Review","authors":"Ana Sebio,&nbsp;Claire Berger,&nbsp;Marie-Dominique Tabone,&nbsp;Natalia Fernandez,&nbsp;Faustine Tardy,&nbsp;Martha Grootenhuis,&nbsp;Emanuela Palmerini,&nbsp;Nathalie Gaspar,&nbsp;Michiel van de Sande,&nbsp;Lianne M. Haveman,&nbsp;The FOSTER Consortium","doi":"10.1155/ecc/5802523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma undergo intensive multimodality treatment that can lead to long-term adverse effects, significantly impacting various aspects of daily living. To objectively assess the Health-Related Quality of Life (HR-QoL) in pediatric and adult populations, several Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements (PROMs) are available. However, these questionnaires often exhibit substantial variability in the domains and items they encompass, frequently failing to address aspects that are particularly important after osteosarcoma treatment. A systematic review was conducted to identify the most frequently used questionnaires concerning QoL in pediatric and adult patients with osteosarcoma and to examine the diverse domains and subdomains of QoL assessed by these questionnaires to identify gaps in their coverage, to recommend suitable instruments for an upcoming European trial within the Fighting Osteosarcoma Through European Research (FOSTER) Consortium. English-language literature published since 1980 in PubMed was reviewed. One hundred twenty-eight articles were initially screened for eligibility. Sixty-three original articles were included in the qualitative synthesis. An overview from review articles was given. Selected studies displayed substantial heterogeneity in terms of their objectives, target populations, age ranges, follow-up time, and number of patients included. None of the questionnaires covered all age groups and addressed all important aspects following osteosarcoma treatment. To comprehensively address as many relevant aspects as possible, a combination of questionnaires is suggested. For the adult population, it is recommended to use the EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire together with the Body Image Scale (BIS), while for pediatric patients, the PedsQl-generic and PedsQl-cancer-specific questionnaires and BIS (&gt; 16 years) are suggested. The use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) can provide a comprehensive assessment of symptoms such as anxiety, pain, and fatigue. The development of new bone sarcoma-specific, pediatric and adult self-reported questionnaires, or the validation and translation of existing bone sarcoma-specific questionnaires, along with the utilization of new digital possibilities, holds great value for upcoming trials.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11953,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer Care","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ecc/5802523","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ecc/5802523","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma undergo intensive multimodality treatment that can lead to long-term adverse effects, significantly impacting various aspects of daily living. To objectively assess the Health-Related Quality of Life (HR-QoL) in pediatric and adult populations, several Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements (PROMs) are available. However, these questionnaires often exhibit substantial variability in the domains and items they encompass, frequently failing to address aspects that are particularly important after osteosarcoma treatment. A systematic review was conducted to identify the most frequently used questionnaires concerning QoL in pediatric and adult patients with osteosarcoma and to examine the diverse domains and subdomains of QoL assessed by these questionnaires to identify gaps in their coverage, to recommend suitable instruments for an upcoming European trial within the Fighting Osteosarcoma Through European Research (FOSTER) Consortium. English-language literature published since 1980 in PubMed was reviewed. One hundred twenty-eight articles were initially screened for eligibility. Sixty-three original articles were included in the qualitative synthesis. An overview from review articles was given. Selected studies displayed substantial heterogeneity in terms of their objectives, target populations, age ranges, follow-up time, and number of patients included. None of the questionnaires covered all age groups and addressed all important aspects following osteosarcoma treatment. To comprehensively address as many relevant aspects as possible, a combination of questionnaires is suggested. For the adult population, it is recommended to use the EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire together with the Body Image Scale (BIS), while for pediatric patients, the PedsQl-generic and PedsQl-cancer-specific questionnaires and BIS (> 16 years) are suggested. The use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) can provide a comprehensive assessment of symptoms such as anxiety, pain, and fatigue. The development of new bone sarcoma-specific, pediatric and adult self-reported questionnaires, or the validation and translation of existing bone sarcoma-specific questionnaires, along with the utilization of new digital possibilities, holds great value for upcoming trials.

Abstract Image

骨肉瘤患者的生活质量和患者报告的预后:一项系统综述
诊断为骨肉瘤的患者需要接受密集的多模式治疗,这可能导致长期的不良反应,严重影响日常生活的各个方面。为了客观地评估儿童和成人人群的健康相关生活质量(HR-QoL),有几种患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)可用。然而,这些问卷通常在其涵盖的领域和项目上表现出很大的差异,经常不能解决骨肉瘤治疗后特别重要的方面。本研究进行了一项系统综述,以确定儿童和成人骨肉瘤患者生活质量中最常用的问卷,并检查这些问卷评估的生活质量的不同领域和子领域,以确定其覆盖范围的差距,并为即将在欧洲通过欧洲研究(FOSTER)联盟进行的欧洲试验推荐合适的工具。回顾了自1980年以来在PubMed上发表的英语文献。128篇文章最初被筛选为合格。63篇原创文章被纳入定性综合。从综述文章中给出了概述。所选研究在其目的、目标人群、年龄范围、随访时间和纳入的患者数量方面显示出实质性的异质性。没有一份调查问卷涵盖所有年龄组,也没有涉及骨肉瘤治疗后的所有重要方面。为了综合处理尽可能多的相关方面,建议采用问卷调查相结合的方式。对于成人患者,建议使用EORTC-QLQ-C30问卷和身体形象量表(BIS),而对于儿科患者,建议使用pedsql通用问卷和pedsql癌症特异性问卷和BIS (>;16年)。使用患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)可以提供焦虑、疼痛和疲劳等症状的全面评估。开发新的骨肉瘤特异性儿童和成人自我报告问卷,或验证和翻译现有骨肉瘤特异性问卷,以及利用新的数字化可能性,对即将进行的试验具有重要价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Cancer Care
European Journal of Cancer Care 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
213
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Cancer Care aims to encourage comprehensive, multiprofessional cancer care across Europe and internationally. It publishes original research reports, literature reviews, guest editorials, letters to the Editor and special features on current issues affecting the care of cancer patients. The Editor welcomes contributions which result from team working or collaboration between different health and social care providers, service users, patient groups and the voluntary sector in the areas of: - Primary, secondary and tertiary care for cancer patients - Multidisciplinary and service-user involvement in cancer care - Rehabilitation, supportive, palliative and end of life care for cancer patients - Policy, service development and healthcare evaluation in cancer care - Psychosocial interventions for patients and family members - International perspectives on cancer care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信