Quantification of endogenous marker acid-insoluble ash in commercial aquaculture ingredients and feeds

IF 2.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 FISHERIES
Julio Camperio, Jorge A. Suarez, Brett Glencross, Daniel D. Benetti
{"title":"Quantification of endogenous marker acid-insoluble ash in commercial aquaculture ingredients and feeds","authors":"Julio Camperio,&nbsp;Jorge A. Suarez,&nbsp;Brett Glencross,&nbsp;Daniel D. Benetti","doi":"10.1111/jwas.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigates the efficacy of acid-insoluble ash (AIA) as an endogenous digestibility marker in commercial aquaculture ingredients and feeds. AIA is a naturally occurring, low-cost alternative to external markers such as chromic oxide and yttrium oxide. External markers are often impractical in the production of small batches of feed manufactured under commercial settings due to cost and logistical constraints. This manuscript is the first of its kind to quantify the AIA content of 18 commercial aquaculture feeds and 27 commercial ingredients from diverse origins, as well as the recuperation rate of pure AIA. Samples were acquired from various national and international sources based on currently available stock; all samples were analyzed in quadruplets for statistical analysis. Results indicated significant variation in AIA levels across different ingredient categories (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), with marine-based meals and rendered animal meals exhibiting the highest AIA concentrations (up to 25.8% and 5.0%, respectively), while vegetable meals displayed the lowest AIA content (up to 0.2%). Shrimp and crab meals had particularly high AIA levels due to their mineral-rich exoskeletons (4.7% and 25.8%, respectively), and meals that had undergone certain commercial processing to increase the meal quality had lower AIA content than their regular counterparts (avian: 2.9% for high quality and 4.4% for regular quality; meat: 0.13% for high quality and 0.8% for regular quality). Additionally, a limit of quantification (LOQ) was determined to define the confidence range of the utilized AIA protocol. This study highlights the importance of considering diet composition and ingredient origin in diet formulation to ensure consistent nutritional outcomes. Furthermore, we demonstrate that a wide range of commercial diets contain a quantifiable amount of AIA. The findings suggest that AIA can serve as a reliable and cost-effective marker for in-vivo digestibility studies, aiding feed manufacturers and farm managers in optimizing production performance by rapidly assessing feed quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":17284,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The World Aquaculture Society","volume":"56 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jwas.70015","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The World Aquaculture Society","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jwas.70015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the efficacy of acid-insoluble ash (AIA) as an endogenous digestibility marker in commercial aquaculture ingredients and feeds. AIA is a naturally occurring, low-cost alternative to external markers such as chromic oxide and yttrium oxide. External markers are often impractical in the production of small batches of feed manufactured under commercial settings due to cost and logistical constraints. This manuscript is the first of its kind to quantify the AIA content of 18 commercial aquaculture feeds and 27 commercial ingredients from diverse origins, as well as the recuperation rate of pure AIA. Samples were acquired from various national and international sources based on currently available stock; all samples were analyzed in quadruplets for statistical analysis. Results indicated significant variation in AIA levels across different ingredient categories (p < 0.05), with marine-based meals and rendered animal meals exhibiting the highest AIA concentrations (up to 25.8% and 5.0%, respectively), while vegetable meals displayed the lowest AIA content (up to 0.2%). Shrimp and crab meals had particularly high AIA levels due to their mineral-rich exoskeletons (4.7% and 25.8%, respectively), and meals that had undergone certain commercial processing to increase the meal quality had lower AIA content than their regular counterparts (avian: 2.9% for high quality and 4.4% for regular quality; meat: 0.13% for high quality and 0.8% for regular quality). Additionally, a limit of quantification (LOQ) was determined to define the confidence range of the utilized AIA protocol. This study highlights the importance of considering diet composition and ingredient origin in diet formulation to ensure consistent nutritional outcomes. Furthermore, we demonstrate that a wide range of commercial diets contain a quantifiable amount of AIA. The findings suggest that AIA can serve as a reliable and cost-effective marker for in-vivo digestibility studies, aiding feed manufacturers and farm managers in optimizing production performance by rapidly assessing feed quality.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
69
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of the World Aquaculture Society is an international scientific journal publishing original research on the culture of aquatic plants and animals including: Nutrition; Disease; Genetics and breeding; Physiology; Environmental quality; Culture systems engineering; Husbandry practices; Economics and marketing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信