Parent–Child Agreement on Fatigue in Pediatric Otolaryngology Patients

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Amy E. Ensing, Amy L. Zhang, Rebecca Z. Lin, Emma K. Landes, Henok Getahun, Judith E. C. Lieu
{"title":"Parent–Child Agreement on Fatigue in Pediatric Otolaryngology Patients","authors":"Amy E. Ensing,&nbsp;Amy L. Zhang,&nbsp;Rebecca Z. Lin,&nbsp;Emma K. Landes,&nbsp;Henok Getahun,&nbsp;Judith E. C. Lieu","doi":"10.1002/lio2.70128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate parent–child agreement on fatigue reporting in pediatric otolaryngology patients and whether agreement might vary by diagnosis and other patient factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study Design</h3>\n \n <p>Cross-sectional survey.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients ages 5–18 years old being evaluated for hearing loss (HL) or obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) were recruited from a pediatric otolaryngology clinic and sleep center. Children and parents completed the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Multidimensional Fatigue Scale (PedsQL MFS).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Responses of 42 patients with HL, 49 with OSA, 10 with sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), and 34 controls were analyzed. Parent and child PedsQL MFS scores were strongly correlated (Pearson <i>r</i> &gt; 0.7) across groups with few exceptions. Only the median child–parent score differences for general domain score in the SDB group (12.5; 95% CI 2.08 to 22.9), and total score (7.41; 95% CI −0.69 to 25.7) and general domain score (11.5; 95% CI 2.08 to 27.1) in the developmental delay group met clinical significance thresholds. Wide confidence intervals prevented definitive conclusions regarding clinical significance. A pattern of decreased parent–child score correlations was observed in children reported to have delays. Weak (±0.1 to ±0.4) to moderate (±0.4 to ±0.69) correlations were observed for total score, general domain score, and cognitive domain score for children with reported developmental/speech/language delay.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, the parent-proxy PedsQL MFS demonstrates strong agreement with self-reports for pediatric otolaryngology patients being evaluated for HL and OSA. However, parent–child score discrepancies within specific patient groups, especially children whose parents reported speech/developmental/language delays, emphasize the importance of administering self-reports when possible.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>3</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48529,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lio2.70128","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.70128","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate parent–child agreement on fatigue reporting in pediatric otolaryngology patients and whether agreement might vary by diagnosis and other patient factors.

Study Design

Cross-sectional survey.

Methods

Patients ages 5–18 years old being evaluated for hearing loss (HL) or obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) were recruited from a pediatric otolaryngology clinic and sleep center. Children and parents completed the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Multidimensional Fatigue Scale (PedsQL MFS).

Results

Responses of 42 patients with HL, 49 with OSA, 10 with sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), and 34 controls were analyzed. Parent and child PedsQL MFS scores were strongly correlated (Pearson r > 0.7) across groups with few exceptions. Only the median child–parent score differences for general domain score in the SDB group (12.5; 95% CI 2.08 to 22.9), and total score (7.41; 95% CI −0.69 to 25.7) and general domain score (11.5; 95% CI 2.08 to 27.1) in the developmental delay group met clinical significance thresholds. Wide confidence intervals prevented definitive conclusions regarding clinical significance. A pattern of decreased parent–child score correlations was observed in children reported to have delays. Weak (±0.1 to ±0.4) to moderate (±0.4 to ±0.69) correlations were observed for total score, general domain score, and cognitive domain score for children with reported developmental/speech/language delay.

Conclusion

Overall, the parent-proxy PedsQL MFS demonstrates strong agreement with self-reports for pediatric otolaryngology patients being evaluated for HL and OSA. However, parent–child score discrepancies within specific patient groups, especially children whose parents reported speech/developmental/language delays, emphasize the importance of administering self-reports when possible.

Level of Evidence

3

Abstract Image

儿童耳鼻喉科患者疲劳的亲子协议
目的探讨儿童耳鼻喉科患者疲劳报告的亲子一致性,以及这种一致性是否会因诊断和其他患者因素而变化。研究设计横断面调查。方法从某儿科耳鼻喉科门诊和睡眠中心招募年龄5-18岁的听力损失(HL)或阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者。儿童和家长完成儿童生活质量量表多维疲劳量表(PedsQL MFS)。结果分析了42例HL患者、49例OSA患者、10例睡眠呼吸障碍(SDB)患者和34例对照组患者的反应。父母和孩子的PedsQL MFS评分在各组之间有很强的相关性(Pearson r > 0.7),几乎没有例外。在SDB组中,只有一般领域得分中位数存在差异(12.5;95% CI 2.08 ~ 22.9),总分(7.41;95% CI−0.69至25.7)和一般领域评分(11.5;发育迟缓组的95% CI(2.08 ~ 27.1)达到了临床意义阈值。较宽的置信区间阻碍了关于临床意义的明确结论。在报告有延迟的儿童中观察到亲子得分相关性降低的模式。报告发育/言语/语言迟缓儿童的总分、一般领域评分和认知领域评分存在弱相关性(±0.1至±0.4)至中度相关性(±0.4至±0.69)。总体而言,父母代理PedsQL MFS与儿童耳鼻喉科患者的自我报告非常一致,这些患者被评估为HL和OSA。然而,在特定的患者群体中,特别是父母报告语言/发育/语言迟缓的儿童,父母-儿童得分差异强调了在可能的情况下管理自我报告的重要性。证据级别3
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信