Measuring Disparities in the Impact of COVID-19 on Pediatric Mental Health in Primary Care Settings

Cecilia Rogers, Katherine Boguszewski, Angela Gummadi, Mark Conaway, Laura Shaffer, Irène Mathieu
{"title":"Measuring Disparities in the Impact of COVID-19 on Pediatric Mental Health in Primary Care Settings","authors":"Cecilia Rogers,&nbsp;Katherine Boguszewski,&nbsp;Angela Gummadi,&nbsp;Mark Conaway,&nbsp;Laura Shaffer,&nbsp;Irène Mathieu","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The purpose of this study is to examine disparities in mental health diagnoses, depression screening, and depressive symptoms in pediatric primary care settings before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, and to evaluate the use of electronic health records to study temporal trends in pediatric mental and behavioral health (MBH). This is an IRB-approved, retrospective study of pediatric patients (<i>n</i> = 11,001) who visited three primary care sites at an academic medical center before (2017–2019) and during (2020–2022) the COVID-19 pandemic. We used logistic regression to compare prevalence of diagnoses, depression screening, and depression symptom scores among demographic groups. This study demonstrates an increase in both PHQ-9A screening rates and average scores from 2017–2019 to 2020–2022. Despite an increase in overall PHQ-9A scores, prevalence of mental health diagnoses is lower in 2020–2022 compared to 2017–2019. There were significant disparities in common mental health diagnoses, including higher rates of psychological distress among lower income patients, both before and during the pandemic. In both cohorts, patients classified as African American, Asian, or Other racial groups had a lower prevalence of diagnoses compared to Caucasian patients. However, patients marked as having multiple racial groups had greater levels of diagnoses. There were also lower screening rates among Hispanic patients. Gender non-conforming patients had a significantly larger burden of psychological distress. This suggests a need for greater equity in routine MBH screening and additional research to better understand the underlying social determinants that may be driving the greater mental health burden for certain marginalized youth. This study also highlights the strengths and challenges of utilizing EHR data to characterize disparities in pediatric mental illness. Although the nature of care delivery in an academic medical center clinic and the limitations of the EHR for collecting relevant data present challenges to this measurement, the EHR is nevertheless a promising tool for measuring and tracking pediatric mental health disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"3 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.70015","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental health science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mhs2.70015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine disparities in mental health diagnoses, depression screening, and depressive symptoms in pediatric primary care settings before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, and to evaluate the use of electronic health records to study temporal trends in pediatric mental and behavioral health (MBH). This is an IRB-approved, retrospective study of pediatric patients (n = 11,001) who visited three primary care sites at an academic medical center before (2017–2019) and during (2020–2022) the COVID-19 pandemic. We used logistic regression to compare prevalence of diagnoses, depression screening, and depression symptom scores among demographic groups. This study demonstrates an increase in both PHQ-9A screening rates and average scores from 2017–2019 to 2020–2022. Despite an increase in overall PHQ-9A scores, prevalence of mental health diagnoses is lower in 2020–2022 compared to 2017–2019. There were significant disparities in common mental health diagnoses, including higher rates of psychological distress among lower income patients, both before and during the pandemic. In both cohorts, patients classified as African American, Asian, or Other racial groups had a lower prevalence of diagnoses compared to Caucasian patients. However, patients marked as having multiple racial groups had greater levels of diagnoses. There were also lower screening rates among Hispanic patients. Gender non-conforming patients had a significantly larger burden of psychological distress. This suggests a need for greater equity in routine MBH screening and additional research to better understand the underlying social determinants that may be driving the greater mental health burden for certain marginalized youth. This study also highlights the strengths and challenges of utilizing EHR data to characterize disparities in pediatric mental illness. Although the nature of care delivery in an academic medical center clinic and the limitations of the EHR for collecting relevant data present challenges to this measurement, the EHR is nevertheless a promising tool for measuring and tracking pediatric mental health disparities.

Abstract Image

衡量COVID-19对初级保健机构儿童心理健康影响的差异
本研究的目的是研究在COVID-19大流行之前和期间,儿科初级保健机构在心理健康诊断、抑郁筛查和抑郁症状方面的差异,并评估电子健康记录的使用情况,以研究儿科心理和行为健康(MBH)的时间趋势。这是一项经irb批准的回顾性研究,研究对象是在COVID-19大流行之前(2017-2019年)和期间(2020-2022年)访问过学术医疗中心三个初级保健站点的儿科患者(n = 11,001)。我们使用逻辑回归比较人口学组间的诊断、抑郁筛查和抑郁症状评分的患病率。该研究表明,从2017-2019年到2020-2022年,PHQ-9A筛查率和平均得分都有所增加。尽管PHQ-9A总分有所上升,但与2017-2019年相比,2020-2022年心理健康诊断的患病率较低。在常见的心理健康诊断方面存在显著差异,包括在大流行之前和期间,低收入患者的心理困扰率较高。在这两个队列中,与白种人患者相比,非裔美国人、亚洲人或其他种族的患者诊断率较低。然而,被标记为多种族群体的患者有更高的诊断水平。西班牙裔患者的筛查率也较低。性别不一致患者的心理困扰负担明显加重。这表明需要在常规MBH筛查中更加公平,并进行更多的研究,以更好地了解可能导致某些边缘化青年心理健康负担加重的潜在社会决定因素。本研究还强调了利用电子病历数据表征儿科精神疾病差异的优势和挑战。尽管学术医疗中心诊所的医疗服务性质和电子病历收集相关数据的局限性对这一测量提出了挑战,但电子病历仍然是测量和跟踪儿童心理健康差异的有前途的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信