Using Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Bovine Leukemia Virus Seropositivity in Florida Beef Cattle: A 10-Year Retrospective Study

IF 2.1 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Ameer A. Megahed, Y. Reddy Bommineni, Michael Short, João H. J. Bittar
{"title":"Using Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Bovine Leukemia Virus Seropositivity in Florida Beef Cattle: A 10-Year Retrospective Study","authors":"Ameer A. Megahed,&nbsp;Y. Reddy Bommineni,&nbsp;Michael Short,&nbsp;João H. J. Bittar","doi":"10.1111/jvim.70070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Bovine leukemia virus (BLV) infection in beef cattle has received less attention than in dairy herds, despite its potential impact on the beef industry.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To compare six different supervised machine-learning (SML) algorithms used to identify the most important risk factors for predicting BLV seropositivity in beef cattle in Florida.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Animals</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective study. We used a dataset of 1511 blood sample records from the Bronson Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, Florida Department of Agriculture &amp; Consumer Services, submitted for BLV antibody testing from 2012 to 2022.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT), gradient boosting (GB), random forest (RF), neural network (NN), and support vector machine (SVM) were used.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of the submitted samples, 11.6% were positive for BLV. The RF model best predicted BLV infection with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.98, with a misclassification rate of 0.06. The DT model showed comparable performance to RF (AUROC, 0.94; misclassification rate, 0.06). However, the NN model had the poorest performance. The RF model showed that BLV seropositivity can be best predicted by testing beef cows during the dry season, which mostly coincides with the pre-calving processing and calving seasons, particularly for cattle raised in southern Florida.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The RF model shows promise for predicting BLV seropositivity in beef cattle. Key predictive risk factors include the dry season months coinciding with pre-calving and calving seasons and geographic location. These findings could help develop predictive tools for effective screening for BLV infection and targeted interventions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine","volume":"39 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jvim.70070","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvim.70070","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Bovine leukemia virus (BLV) infection in beef cattle has received less attention than in dairy herds, despite its potential impact on the beef industry.

Objectives

To compare six different supervised machine-learning (SML) algorithms used to identify the most important risk factors for predicting BLV seropositivity in beef cattle in Florida.

Animals

Retrospective study. We used a dataset of 1511 blood sample records from the Bronson Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services, submitted for BLV antibody testing from 2012 to 2022.

Methods

Logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT), gradient boosting (GB), random forest (RF), neural network (NN), and support vector machine (SVM) were used.

Results

Of the submitted samples, 11.6% were positive for BLV. The RF model best predicted BLV infection with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.98, with a misclassification rate of 0.06. The DT model showed comparable performance to RF (AUROC, 0.94; misclassification rate, 0.06). However, the NN model had the poorest performance. The RF model showed that BLV seropositivity can be best predicted by testing beef cows during the dry season, which mostly coincides with the pre-calving processing and calving seasons, particularly for cattle raised in southern Florida.

Conclusions

The RF model shows promise for predicting BLV seropositivity in beef cattle. Key predictive risk factors include the dry season months coinciding with pre-calving and calving seasons and geographic location. These findings could help develop predictive tools for effective screening for BLV infection and targeted interventions.

Abstract Image

使用监督机器学习算法预测佛罗里达州肉牛的牛白血病病毒血清阳性率:10 年回顾性研究
背景牛白血病病毒(BLV)感染在肉牛中受到的关注比在奶牛群中受到的关注少,尽管它对牛肉产业有潜在的影响。目的比较六种不同的监督机器学习(SML)算法,用于识别预测佛罗里达州肉牛BLV血清阳性的最重要危险因素。动物回顾性研究。我们使用了来自佛罗里达州农业部布朗森动物疾病诊断实验室的1511份血液样本记录的数据集;消费者服务部,2012年至2022年提交BLV抗体检测。方法采用Logistic回归(LR)、决策树(DT)、梯度增强(GB)、随机森林(RF)、神经网络(NN)、支持向量机(SVM)等方法。结果在提交的样本中,BLV阳性率为11.6%。RF模型预测BLV感染的最佳值为受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)为0.98,误分类率为0.06。DT模型表现出与RF相当的性能(AUROC, 0.94;误分类率,0.06)。然而,神经网络模型的性能最差。RF模型显示,在旱季对肉牛进行测试可以最好地预测BLV血清阳性,旱季大多与产犊前加工和产犊季节相吻合,特别是在佛罗里达州南部饲养的牛。结论该模型可用于肉牛BLV血清阳性预测。关键的预测风险因素包括与产犊前和产犊季节相吻合的旱季月份以及地理位置。这些发现可能有助于开发有效筛查BLV感染和有针对性干预的预测工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.50%
发文量
243
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine is to advance veterinary medical knowledge and improve the lives of animals by publication of authoritative scientific articles of animal diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信