Marije Miedema, Susan Aasman, Anne Beaulieu, Sabrina Sauer
{"title":"An ecologically just future for personal digital heritage: three guiding statements","authors":"Marije Miedema, Susan Aasman, Anne Beaulieu, Sabrina Sauer","doi":"10.1007/s10502-025-09481-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Archival and cultural heritage institutions should take control of our personal digital past in our current global ecological crisis. To develop this argument, this position paper moves beyond the disciplinary lines present in studies of preservation and introduces the concept of <i>personal digital heritage</i>. The concept takes an ecomaterial perspective to contextualise long-term preservation practices, specifies the context of where these practice-based considerations take place, and documents what informs them. This approach allows for a more holistic approach to grasp the ecological implications of personal preservation practices. So far, approaches that should safeguard our current personal digital heritage have been informed by an archival desire embedded in technological solutionism. This article extends social justice principles put forth in critical archival studies, connects these to ecological justice principles present in environmental media studies, and explicitly relates this to the personal. To show a way forward based on this combination, we introduce three guiding statements connected to three questions that lead archival professionals towards an ecologically just archival ecosystem encompassing Big Tech, archival and cultural heritage institutions, and individuals: (1) Take it down: asks where our archive is and considers reconfiguring institutional archival processes an act of ecological care and resistance to Big Tech; (2) Take it slow: asks whose heritage we are preserving and urges us to move from efficiency to sufficiency. (3) Take it back: asks who cares for our heritage and argues for archival and cultural heritage institutions to engage with public infrastructures and initiatives that limit Big Tech influence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46131,"journal":{"name":"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE","volume":"25 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10502-025-09481-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10502-025-09481-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Archival and cultural heritage institutions should take control of our personal digital past in our current global ecological crisis. To develop this argument, this position paper moves beyond the disciplinary lines present in studies of preservation and introduces the concept of personal digital heritage. The concept takes an ecomaterial perspective to contextualise long-term preservation practices, specifies the context of where these practice-based considerations take place, and documents what informs them. This approach allows for a more holistic approach to grasp the ecological implications of personal preservation practices. So far, approaches that should safeguard our current personal digital heritage have been informed by an archival desire embedded in technological solutionism. This article extends social justice principles put forth in critical archival studies, connects these to ecological justice principles present in environmental media studies, and explicitly relates this to the personal. To show a way forward based on this combination, we introduce three guiding statements connected to three questions that lead archival professionals towards an ecologically just archival ecosystem encompassing Big Tech, archival and cultural heritage institutions, and individuals: (1) Take it down: asks where our archive is and considers reconfiguring institutional archival processes an act of ecological care and resistance to Big Tech; (2) Take it slow: asks whose heritage we are preserving and urges us to move from efficiency to sufficiency. (3) Take it back: asks who cares for our heritage and argues for archival and cultural heritage institutions to engage with public infrastructures and initiatives that limit Big Tech influence.
期刊介绍:
Archival Science promotes the development of archival science as an autonomous scientific discipline. The journal covers all aspects of archival science theory, methodology, and practice. Moreover, it investigates different cultural approaches to creation, management and provision of access to archives, records, and data. It also seeks to promote the exchange and comparison of concepts, views and attitudes related to recordkeeping issues around the world.Archival Science''s approach is integrated, interdisciplinary, and intercultural. Its scope encompasses the entire field of recorded process-related information, analyzed in terms of form, structure, and context. To meet its objectives, the journal draws from scientific disciplines that deal with the function of records and the way they are created, preserved, and retrieved; the context in which information is generated, managed, and used; and the social and cultural environment of records creation at different times and places.Covers all aspects of archival science theory, methodology, and practiceInvestigates different cultural approaches to creation, management and provision of access to archives, records, and dataPromotes the exchange and comparison of concepts, views, and attitudes related to recordkeeping issues around the worldAddresses the entire field of recorded process-related information, analyzed in terms of form, structure, and context