Efficacy of intradermal tranexamic acid injection following IPL for the treatment of persistent post acne erythema: a split-face, controlled trial

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Mehdi Gheisari, Nushin Golchin, Afsaneh Sadeghzadeh Bazargan, Latif Gachkar, Shirin Zaresharifi
{"title":"Efficacy of intradermal tranexamic acid injection following IPL for the treatment of persistent post acne erythema: a split-face, controlled trial","authors":"Mehdi Gheisari,&nbsp;Nushin Golchin,&nbsp;Afsaneh Sadeghzadeh Bazargan,&nbsp;Latif Gachkar,&nbsp;Shirin Zaresharifi","doi":"10.1007/s00403-025-04215-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Post-acne erythema (PAE) is a common consequence of acne vulgaris, often leading to significant psychological distress and social impairment. While Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) has been proven as a non-invasive option for reducing erythema, the addition of adjunctive therapies may enhance treatment outcomes. To evaluate the effects of intradermal tranexamic acid (TXA) injections on the reduction of persistent PAE following IPL therapy in a split-face controlled trial. 33 patients aged 16 to 45 with persistent PAE were randomly assigned to receive either IPL with intradermal injection of TXA or IPL with placebo (normal saline) on opposite sides of their faces. A total of three treatment sessions were performed three weeks apart. Improvement in PAE was assessed at the follow-up session one month after the third session compared to before treatment. The response to treatment was assessed using the total physician’s score of improvement based on the clinician erythema assessment scale and the patient’s self-assessment based on a rating of 1 to 4. According to physicians’ scores of improvement and patients’ self-assessment of TXA injection, improvement in erythema was observed in most of the patients. Nevertheless, these results were not statistically significant. In addition, IPL treatment (on the control side) effectively improved PAE based on physicians’ scores of improvement and patients’ self-assessments, still, these results were statistically significant only in the physicians’ scores of improvements. Furthermore, 53% of patients did not report adverse reactions on the intervention side. The most commonly mentioned side effect was erythema on the injection side in 27.3% of patients, which was resolved within 24 h in all cases. This study highlights the complexities of treating persistent PAE. While most patients reported mild to moderate improvement with intradermal TXA, the combination of intradermal TXA and IPL did not show significant improvement over IPL treatment. Adverse effects were minimal, with injection site erythema being the most common. These findings warrant further investigation into optimizing treatment protocols for PAE management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8203,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Dermatological Research","volume":"317 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Dermatological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00403-025-04215-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Post-acne erythema (PAE) is a common consequence of acne vulgaris, often leading to significant psychological distress and social impairment. While Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) has been proven as a non-invasive option for reducing erythema, the addition of adjunctive therapies may enhance treatment outcomes. To evaluate the effects of intradermal tranexamic acid (TXA) injections on the reduction of persistent PAE following IPL therapy in a split-face controlled trial. 33 patients aged 16 to 45 with persistent PAE were randomly assigned to receive either IPL with intradermal injection of TXA or IPL with placebo (normal saline) on opposite sides of their faces. A total of three treatment sessions were performed three weeks apart. Improvement in PAE was assessed at the follow-up session one month after the third session compared to before treatment. The response to treatment was assessed using the total physician’s score of improvement based on the clinician erythema assessment scale and the patient’s self-assessment based on a rating of 1 to 4. According to physicians’ scores of improvement and patients’ self-assessment of TXA injection, improvement in erythema was observed in most of the patients. Nevertheless, these results were not statistically significant. In addition, IPL treatment (on the control side) effectively improved PAE based on physicians’ scores of improvement and patients’ self-assessments, still, these results were statistically significant only in the physicians’ scores of improvements. Furthermore, 53% of patients did not report adverse reactions on the intervention side. The most commonly mentioned side effect was erythema on the injection side in 27.3% of patients, which was resolved within 24 h in all cases. This study highlights the complexities of treating persistent PAE. While most patients reported mild to moderate improvement with intradermal TXA, the combination of intradermal TXA and IPL did not show significant improvement over IPL treatment. Adverse effects were minimal, with injection site erythema being the most common. These findings warrant further investigation into optimizing treatment protocols for PAE management.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
30
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Dermatological Research is a highly rated international journal that publishes original contributions in the field of experimental dermatology, including papers on biochemistry, morphology and immunology of the skin. The journal is among the few not related to dermatological associations or belonging to respective societies which guarantees complete independence. This English-language journal also offers a platform for review articles in areas of interest for dermatologists and for publication of innovative clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信