It is Not Easy Diffusing Green: The Impact of Mandatory Regulations on the Diffusion Breadth and Depth of Voluntary Environmental Standards

IF 4.6 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Liumiao Qin;Qinghua He;Ge Wang;Qingwei Nie;Jian Zuo
{"title":"It is Not Easy Diffusing Green: The Impact of Mandatory Regulations on the Diffusion Breadth and Depth of Voluntary Environmental Standards","authors":"Liumiao Qin;Qinghua He;Ge Wang;Qingwei Nie;Jian Zuo","doi":"10.1109/TEM.2025.3550873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The adoption of voluntary environmental standards has emerged as a promising approach to coping with climate change and achieving sustainable development. While prior research has underscored the significance of establishing an appropriate regulatory environment in diffusing these standards, the relationship between mandatory regulations and voluntary environmental standards adoption remains controversial. Distinguishing from the view of a positive or negative linear relationship, in this article, we draw on neoinstitutional theory to suggest that the tradeoff between the legitimacy benefits and costs may result in a curvilinear relationship. Specifically, using leadership in energy and environmental design certification data in the U.S. states from 2000 to 2020, we investigate how mandatory regulations influence the diffusion of voluntary environmental standards and examine the moderating role of policy mood (liberal ideology versus conservative ideology). Our findings reveal a U-shaped relationship between mandatory regulations and the diffusion breadth and depth of voluntary environmental standards. Moreover, policy mood favoring more liberal ideology amplifies the convexity of these U-shaped relationships. Our study contributes to the growing body of research on environmental governance and offers novel insights into strategies for effectively diffusing voluntary environmental standards in terms of breadth and depth. In addition, this study also provides guidance for policymakers to foster sustainability practices diffusion through regulatory instruments.","PeriodicalId":55009,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","volume":"72 ","pages":"1102-1116"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10924766/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The adoption of voluntary environmental standards has emerged as a promising approach to coping with climate change and achieving sustainable development. While prior research has underscored the significance of establishing an appropriate regulatory environment in diffusing these standards, the relationship between mandatory regulations and voluntary environmental standards adoption remains controversial. Distinguishing from the view of a positive or negative linear relationship, in this article, we draw on neoinstitutional theory to suggest that the tradeoff between the legitimacy benefits and costs may result in a curvilinear relationship. Specifically, using leadership in energy and environmental design certification data in the U.S. states from 2000 to 2020, we investigate how mandatory regulations influence the diffusion of voluntary environmental standards and examine the moderating role of policy mood (liberal ideology versus conservative ideology). Our findings reveal a U-shaped relationship between mandatory regulations and the diffusion breadth and depth of voluntary environmental standards. Moreover, policy mood favoring more liberal ideology amplifies the convexity of these U-shaped relationships. Our study contributes to the growing body of research on environmental governance and offers novel insights into strategies for effectively diffusing voluntary environmental standards in terms of breadth and depth. In addition, this study also provides guidance for policymakers to foster sustainability practices diffusion through regulatory instruments.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
19.00%
发文量
604
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Management of technical functions such as research, development, and engineering in industry, government, university, and other settings. Emphasis is on studies carried on within an organization to help in decision making or policy formation for RD&E.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信