Auditory modulation processing in children with mild to moderate hearing loss

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Ferdous Rasouli , Parisa Jalilzadeh Afshari , Enayatollah Bakhshi
{"title":"Auditory modulation processing in children with mild to moderate hearing loss","authors":"Ferdous Rasouli ,&nbsp;Parisa Jalilzadeh Afshari ,&nbsp;Enayatollah Bakhshi","doi":"10.1016/j.ijporl.2025.112330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Children with hearing loss often have difficulty understanding speech in noisy environments like classrooms, leading to educational and communication challenges. Detecting and discriminating auditory spectro-temporal fundamentals is essential for speech comprehension. So, in this study, we investigated how children with mild to moderate hearing loss (MMHL) process these auditory modulations and their relation to speech perception in noise, comparing their performance to that of children with normal hearing.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This cross-sectional study selected 31 children with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and 34 normally hearing (NH) children, aged 8 to 12. After obtaining consent, participants underwent tests, including the Spectral Modulation Ripple Test (SMRT), Amplitude Modulation Detection Tests (AMDTs) at 10, 50, and 200 Hz, and Speech Perception in Noise (SPiN) assessments using Word-in-Noise (WIN) and BKB-SIN tests, conducted monaurally. Results were compared between the two groups, evaluating the effects of hearing loss severity and correlations among the tests, as well as score comparisons from both ears within each group.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Significant differences were observed between groups (MMHL and NH) in SMRT, AMDTs, and SPiN tests (p &lt; 0.05), with the NH group scoring better. However, no significant differences were observed between mild and moderate hearing loss (p &gt; 0.05). There was no correlation between SMRT and AMDTs with the WIN test (p &gt; 0.05). Notably, significant correlations were found between SMRT and BKB tests in both groups. Sporadic correlations were also identified between AMDTs at higher rates and BKB results for both groups (p &lt; 0.05). Scores between the two ears showed no significant differences across all tests (p &gt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Children with Mild to moderate SNHL have a lesser ability to use spectral and temporal modulation information, making it difficult for them to understand speech in noisy environments. Nonverbal spectral and temporal modulation tests require minimal cognitive effort and are valuable for evaluating perceptual disorders and developing auditory rehabilitation programs for these children.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14388,"journal":{"name":"International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 112330"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016558762500117X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective

Children with hearing loss often have difficulty understanding speech in noisy environments like classrooms, leading to educational and communication challenges. Detecting and discriminating auditory spectro-temporal fundamentals is essential for speech comprehension. So, in this study, we investigated how children with mild to moderate hearing loss (MMHL) process these auditory modulations and their relation to speech perception in noise, comparing their performance to that of children with normal hearing.

Methods

This cross-sectional study selected 31 children with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and 34 normally hearing (NH) children, aged 8 to 12. After obtaining consent, participants underwent tests, including the Spectral Modulation Ripple Test (SMRT), Amplitude Modulation Detection Tests (AMDTs) at 10, 50, and 200 Hz, and Speech Perception in Noise (SPiN) assessments using Word-in-Noise (WIN) and BKB-SIN tests, conducted monaurally. Results were compared between the two groups, evaluating the effects of hearing loss severity and correlations among the tests, as well as score comparisons from both ears within each group.

Results

Significant differences were observed between groups (MMHL and NH) in SMRT, AMDTs, and SPiN tests (p < 0.05), with the NH group scoring better. However, no significant differences were observed between mild and moderate hearing loss (p > 0.05). There was no correlation between SMRT and AMDTs with the WIN test (p > 0.05). Notably, significant correlations were found between SMRT and BKB tests in both groups. Sporadic correlations were also identified between AMDTs at higher rates and BKB results for both groups (p < 0.05). Scores between the two ears showed no significant differences across all tests (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Children with Mild to moderate SNHL have a lesser ability to use spectral and temporal modulation information, making it difficult for them to understand speech in noisy environments. Nonverbal spectral and temporal modulation tests require minimal cognitive effort and are valuable for evaluating perceptual disorders and developing auditory rehabilitation programs for these children.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
276
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of the International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology is to concentrate and disseminate information concerning prevention, cure and care of otorhinolaryngological disorders in infants and children due to developmental, degenerative, infectious, neoplastic, traumatic, social, psychiatric and economic causes. The Journal provides a medium for clinical and basic contributions in all of the areas of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. This includes medical and surgical otology, bronchoesophagology, laryngology, rhinology, diseases of the head and neck, and disorders of communication, including voice, speech and language disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信