Emotional labour in midwifery care: Balancing between woman’s autonomy and clinical control during childbirth through watchful attendance

IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Giulia Sinatti , Lotte Kaster , Jip Hoeijmakers , Larissa Zanstra , Corine Verhoeven , Ank de Jonge
{"title":"Emotional labour in midwifery care: Balancing between woman’s autonomy and clinical control during childbirth through watchful attendance","authors":"Giulia Sinatti ,&nbsp;Lotte Kaster ,&nbsp;Jip Hoeijmakers ,&nbsp;Larissa Zanstra ,&nbsp;Corine Verhoeven ,&nbsp;Ank de Jonge","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article explores midwives' engagement with emotional labour. Drawing on theorisation first proposed by Arlie Hochschild, we investigate how midwives display emotions to induce certain emotional states in the birthing woman and, while doing so, simultaneously regulate their own emotions. Inspired by recent work from within the field of midwifery science on ‘watchful attendance’, we understand midwivery care as uniquely combining both clinical expertise and woman-centred support, particularly during childbirth. This perspective moves away from prevailing dichotomous views in the literature that tend to frame midwifery and technocratic models as oppositional, the former inspired by a natural and the latter by a pathological approach to birth. Ethnographic research we conducted in the Netherlands —including observations during childbirth and in-depth interviews with midwives and birthing women— confirms that midwives' work simultaneously responds to different care logics and that they deal with an inherent tension between promoting natural birth while ensuring clinical safety. We identify this tension as a key source of midwives' emotional labour, as they experience having to balance between the prioritization of women's autonomy, essential for natural birth, with the exercise of clinical control to monitor for and respond to potential risks. Our research highlights the emotional demands placed on midwives and calls for greater recognition of the emotional dimensions of their work.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74862,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100546"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321525000241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores midwives' engagement with emotional labour. Drawing on theorisation first proposed by Arlie Hochschild, we investigate how midwives display emotions to induce certain emotional states in the birthing woman and, while doing so, simultaneously regulate their own emotions. Inspired by recent work from within the field of midwifery science on ‘watchful attendance’, we understand midwivery care as uniquely combining both clinical expertise and woman-centred support, particularly during childbirth. This perspective moves away from prevailing dichotomous views in the literature that tend to frame midwifery and technocratic models as oppositional, the former inspired by a natural and the latter by a pathological approach to birth. Ethnographic research we conducted in the Netherlands —including observations during childbirth and in-depth interviews with midwives and birthing women— confirms that midwives' work simultaneously responds to different care logics and that they deal with an inherent tension between promoting natural birth while ensuring clinical safety. We identify this tension as a key source of midwives' emotional labour, as they experience having to balance between the prioritization of women's autonomy, essential for natural birth, with the exercise of clinical control to monitor for and respond to potential risks. Our research highlights the emotional demands placed on midwives and calls for greater recognition of the emotional dimensions of their work.
助产护理中的情绪劳动:在分娩过程中通过观察护理来平衡妇女的自主性和临床控制
这篇文章探讨了助产士参与情绪劳动。根据Arlie Hochschild首先提出的理论,我们研究了助产士如何表现情绪来诱导分娩妇女的某些情绪状态,同时调节自己的情绪。受到最近在助产科学领域关于“观察出席”的工作的启发,我们理解助产护理是临床专业知识和以妇女为中心的支持的独特结合,特别是在分娩期间。这种观点远离了文献中流行的二分法观点,这种观点倾向于将助产和技术官僚模型作为对立的框架,前者受到自然分娩方法的启发,后者受到病理分娩方法的启发。我们在荷兰进行的人种学研究——包括对分娩过程的观察和对助产士和分娩妇女的深入访谈——证实了助产士的工作同时响应不同的护理逻辑,他们处理促进自然分娩和确保临床安全之间的内在紧张关系。我们认为这种紧张关系是助产士情绪劳动的一个关键来源,因为她们必须在优先考虑妇女自主(自然分娩必不可少)与行使临床控制以监测和应对潜在风险之间取得平衡。我们的研究强调了助产士的情感需求,并呼吁更多地认识到他们工作的情感层面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
163 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信