A nature-based solution to enhance aquifer recharge: Combining trees and infiltration basins

IF 4.9 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Jose David Henao Casas , Enrique Fernández Escalante , Juan Carlos Richard-Cerda , Francisco Ayuga
{"title":"A nature-based solution to enhance aquifer recharge: Combining trees and infiltration basins","authors":"Jose David Henao Casas ,&nbsp;Enrique Fernández Escalante ,&nbsp;Juan Carlos Richard-Cerda ,&nbsp;Francisco Ayuga","doi":"10.1016/j.gsd.2025.101436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Managed aquifer recharge (MAR) is the replenishment of aquifers for environmental recovery or later use of the stored water. Under increasing occurrence of hydrological extremes, it shows great potential to buffer water availability. Nonetheless, these systems are affected by clogging, which decreases the infiltration rates over time. To deal with this issue and evaluate the potential to enhance recharge, we studied the effect of poplars (Populus Nigra predominantly) on two infiltration basins in a MAR system in central Spain, namely Santiuste (ST) and La Laguna del Señor (LS). The hypothesis is that plant roots can increase infiltration rates and counteract the effect of clogging through macropore formation and changes in soil characteristics. To this end, we conducted eight on-site infiltration test campaigns over two years in areas with and without trees, in addition to determining bulk density, organic carbon content and soil textures. We also built a 1-D vadose zone model and compared measured steady-state infiltration rates (SSIR) with theoretical values. When compared to bare soil, areas with trees show higher SSIR (37 % difference on average), higher organic carbon content (113 % difference on average), and lower bulk density (38 % difference on average). In all cases, measured SSIR values were larger than theoretical values, meaning that textures alone cannot explain local infiltration rates. Moreover, the difference between theoretical and measured SSIR is larger in trees than in bare soil by 40 % in ST and 198 % in LS. The 1-D vadose zone model shows that in the area studied, the transpiration by trees is largely offset by the additional recharge due to enhanced soil infiltration rates. These results suggest that trees increase infiltration rates, likely due to macropores and aggregate formation and the rearrangement of the soil structure. This nature-based solution could be extended to other MAR water-spreading methods and in-channel modifications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37879,"journal":{"name":"Groundwater for Sustainable Development","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 101436"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Groundwater for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352801X25000335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Managed aquifer recharge (MAR) is the replenishment of aquifers for environmental recovery or later use of the stored water. Under increasing occurrence of hydrological extremes, it shows great potential to buffer water availability. Nonetheless, these systems are affected by clogging, which decreases the infiltration rates over time. To deal with this issue and evaluate the potential to enhance recharge, we studied the effect of poplars (Populus Nigra predominantly) on two infiltration basins in a MAR system in central Spain, namely Santiuste (ST) and La Laguna del Señor (LS). The hypothesis is that plant roots can increase infiltration rates and counteract the effect of clogging through macropore formation and changes in soil characteristics. To this end, we conducted eight on-site infiltration test campaigns over two years in areas with and without trees, in addition to determining bulk density, organic carbon content and soil textures. We also built a 1-D vadose zone model and compared measured steady-state infiltration rates (SSIR) with theoretical values. When compared to bare soil, areas with trees show higher SSIR (37 % difference on average), higher organic carbon content (113 % difference on average), and lower bulk density (38 % difference on average). In all cases, measured SSIR values were larger than theoretical values, meaning that textures alone cannot explain local infiltration rates. Moreover, the difference between theoretical and measured SSIR is larger in trees than in bare soil by 40 % in ST and 198 % in LS. The 1-D vadose zone model shows that in the area studied, the transpiration by trees is largely offset by the additional recharge due to enhanced soil infiltration rates. These results suggest that trees increase infiltration rates, likely due to macropores and aggregate formation and the rearrangement of the soil structure. This nature-based solution could be extended to other MAR water-spreading methods and in-channel modifications.

Abstract Image

加强含水层补给的自然解决方案:结合树木和渗透盆地
管理含水层补给(MAR)是对含水层的补充,用于环境恢复或以后使用储存的水。在极端水文事件不断增加的情况下,它显示出巨大的缓冲水可用性的潜力。然而,随着时间的推移,这些系统会受到堵塞的影响,从而降低渗透速率。为了解决这一问题并评估其增强补给的潜力,我们研究了杨树(主要是黑杨树)对西班牙中部一个MAR系统中两个入渗盆地(即Santiuste (ST)和La Laguna del Señor (LS))的影响。假设植物根系可以通过大孔的形成和土壤特性的改变来增加入渗速率和抵消堵塞的影响。为此,我们在两年多的时间里,在有树木和没有树木的地区进行了八次现场渗透测试,此外还测定了土壤的体积密度、有机碳含量和土壤质地。我们还建立了一维渗透带模型,并将测量的稳态渗透速率(SSIR)与理论值进行了比较。与光秃秃的土壤相比,有树木的地区表现出更高的SSIR(平均差异37%),更高的有机碳含量(平均差异113%)和更低的容重(平均差异38%)。在所有情况下,测量的SSIR值都大于理论值,这意味着纹理本身不能解释当地的入渗速率。此外,理论SSIR与实测SSIR的差异在林下比在裸露土壤中大40%,在林下比在裸露土壤大198%。一维渗流带模型表明,在研究区,树木的蒸腾在很大程度上被土壤入渗速率增加所带来的额外补给所抵消。这些结果表明,树木增加了入渗速率,可能是由于大孔隙和团聚体的形成以及土壤结构的重新排列。这种基于自然的解决方案可以扩展到其他MAR扩水方法和通道内改造。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Groundwater for Sustainable Development
Groundwater for Sustainable Development Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
10.20%
发文量
152
期刊介绍: Groundwater for Sustainable Development is directed to different stakeholders and professionals, including government and non-governmental organizations, international funding agencies, universities, public water institutions, public health and other public/private sector professionals, and other relevant institutions. It is aimed at professionals, academics and students in the fields of disciplines such as: groundwater and its connection to surface hydrology and environment, soil sciences, engineering, ecology, microbiology, atmospheric sciences, analytical chemistry, hydro-engineering, water technology, environmental ethics, economics, public health, policy, as well as social sciences, legal disciplines, or any other area connected with water issues. The objectives of this journal are to facilitate: • The improvement of effective and sustainable management of water resources across the globe. • The improvement of human access to groundwater resources in adequate quantity and good quality. • The meeting of the increasing demand for drinking and irrigation water needed for food security to contribute to a social and economically sound human development. • The creation of a global inter- and multidisciplinary platform and forum to improve our understanding of groundwater resources and to advocate their effective and sustainable management and protection against contamination. • Interdisciplinary information exchange and to stimulate scientific research in the fields of groundwater related sciences and social and health sciences required to achieve the United Nations Millennium Development Goals for sustainable development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信