Yuichi Chihara, Tomomasa Tsuboi, Kensuke Sumi, Hiromasa Tachibana, Atsuo Sato
{"title":"Effect of high fraction of inspired oxygen and high flow on exercise tolerance in patients with COPD and IPF: A randomized crossover trial","authors":"Yuichi Chihara, Tomomasa Tsuboi, Kensuke Sumi, Hiromasa Tachibana, Atsuo Sato","doi":"10.1016/j.resinv.2025.03.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The effect of combining high fraction of inspired oxygen (F<sub>I</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) and high flow through a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) on exercise tolerance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) remains unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This prospective, single-blind, randomized, crossover study included patients with COPD (n = 25) and IPF (n = 25). The patients performed a 6-min walking test (6 MWT) while attached to a battery-supplied portable HFNC device under the following four conditions: F<sub>I</sub>O<sub>2</sub> set to a minimum percutaneous oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>) of 86–88 % during 6 MWT with a flow rate of 10 L/min (LOLF) or 50 L/min (LOHF); and F<sub>I</sub>O<sub>2</sub> set to a minimum SpO<sub>2</sub> of 92–94 % with a flow rate of 10 L/min (HOLF) or 50 L/min (HOHF).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In both groups, the 6-min walking distance (6 MWD) was significantly greater for HOHF than for LOLF (COPD: 323.2 ± 77.6 m vs. 268.6 ± 87.3 m, respectively, p < 0.0001 and IPF: 406 ± 50.7 m vs. 372.3 ± 50.9 m, respectively, p < 0.0001).</div><div>In the analysis of the interaction effects for the 6 MWD, the combination of high F<sub>I</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and high flow resulted in an additional 15.9-m extension of the 6 MWD (95 % confidence interval: 0.34–31.5; p = 0.050). The interaction between IPF and high-flow was −14.0 m, suggesting a less pronounced extension effect compared with COPD (95 % confidence interval: −29.5–1.6; p = 0.085).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The combination of high F<sub>I</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and high flow through an HFNC may improve exercise tolerance in patients with COPD and IPF.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20934,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory investigation","volume":"63 3","pages":"Pages 431-437"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory investigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212534525000413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The effect of combining high fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) and high flow through a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) on exercise tolerance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) remains unclear.
Methods
This prospective, single-blind, randomized, crossover study included patients with COPD (n = 25) and IPF (n = 25). The patients performed a 6-min walking test (6 MWT) while attached to a battery-supplied portable HFNC device under the following four conditions: FIO2 set to a minimum percutaneous oxygen saturation (SpO2) of 86–88 % during 6 MWT with a flow rate of 10 L/min (LOLF) or 50 L/min (LOHF); and FIO2 set to a minimum SpO2 of 92–94 % with a flow rate of 10 L/min (HOLF) or 50 L/min (HOHF).
Results
In both groups, the 6-min walking distance (6 MWD) was significantly greater for HOHF than for LOLF (COPD: 323.2 ± 77.6 m vs. 268.6 ± 87.3 m, respectively, p < 0.0001 and IPF: 406 ± 50.7 m vs. 372.3 ± 50.9 m, respectively, p < 0.0001).
In the analysis of the interaction effects for the 6 MWD, the combination of high FIO2 and high flow resulted in an additional 15.9-m extension of the 6 MWD (95 % confidence interval: 0.34–31.5; p = 0.050). The interaction between IPF and high-flow was −14.0 m, suggesting a less pronounced extension effect compared with COPD (95 % confidence interval: −29.5–1.6; p = 0.085).
Conclusion
The combination of high FIO2 and high flow through an HFNC may improve exercise tolerance in patients with COPD and IPF.