Calibration of medium-range metocean forecasts for the North Sea

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, OCEAN
Conor Murphy , Ross Towe , Philip Jonathan
{"title":"Calibration of medium-range metocean forecasts for the North Sea","authors":"Conor Murphy ,&nbsp;Ross Towe ,&nbsp;Philip Jonathan","doi":"10.1016/j.apor.2025.104538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We assess the value of calibrating forecast models for significant wave height <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>H</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>S</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>, wind speed <span><math><mi>W</mi></math></span> and mean spectral wave period <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>T</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>m</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> for forecast horizons between zero and 168 h from a commercial forecast provider, to improve forecast performance for a location in the central North Sea. We consider two straightforward calibration models, linear regression (LR) and non-homogeneous Gaussian regression (NHGR), incorporating deterministic, control and ensemble mean forecast covariates. We show that relatively simple calibration models (with at most three covariates) provide good calibration and that addition of further covariates cannot be justified. Optimal calibration models (for the forecast mean of a physical quantity) always make use of the deterministic forecast and ensemble mean forecast for the same quantity, together with a covariate associated with a different physical quantity. The selection of optimal covariates is performed independently per forecast horizon, and the set of optimal covariates shows a large degree of consistency across forecast horizons. As a result, it is possible to specify a consistent model to calibrate a given physical quantity, incorporating a common set of three covariates for all horizons. For NHGR models of a given physical quantity, the ensemble forecast standard deviation for that quantity is skilful in predicting forecast error standard deviation, strikingly so for <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>H</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>S</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>. We show that the consistent LR and NHGR calibration models facilitate reduction in forecast bias to near zero for all of <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>H</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>S</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>, <span><math><mi>W</mi></math></span> and <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>T</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>m</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>, and that there is little difference between LR and NHGR calibration for the mean. Both LR and NHGR models facilitate reduction in forecast error standard deviation relative to naive adoption of the (uncalibrated) deterministic forecast, with NHGR providing somewhat better performance. Distributions of standardised residuals from NHGR are generally more similar to a standard Gaussian than those from LR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8261,"journal":{"name":"Applied Ocean Research","volume":"158 ","pages":"Article 104538"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Ocean Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141118725001269","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, OCEAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We assess the value of calibrating forecast models for significant wave height HS, wind speed W and mean spectral wave period Tm for forecast horizons between zero and 168 h from a commercial forecast provider, to improve forecast performance for a location in the central North Sea. We consider two straightforward calibration models, linear regression (LR) and non-homogeneous Gaussian regression (NHGR), incorporating deterministic, control and ensemble mean forecast covariates. We show that relatively simple calibration models (with at most three covariates) provide good calibration and that addition of further covariates cannot be justified. Optimal calibration models (for the forecast mean of a physical quantity) always make use of the deterministic forecast and ensemble mean forecast for the same quantity, together with a covariate associated with a different physical quantity. The selection of optimal covariates is performed independently per forecast horizon, and the set of optimal covariates shows a large degree of consistency across forecast horizons. As a result, it is possible to specify a consistent model to calibrate a given physical quantity, incorporating a common set of three covariates for all horizons. For NHGR models of a given physical quantity, the ensemble forecast standard deviation for that quantity is skilful in predicting forecast error standard deviation, strikingly so for HS. We show that the consistent LR and NHGR calibration models facilitate reduction in forecast bias to near zero for all of HS, W and Tm, and that there is little difference between LR and NHGR calibration for the mean. Both LR and NHGR models facilitate reduction in forecast error standard deviation relative to naive adoption of the (uncalibrated) deterministic forecast, with NHGR providing somewhat better performance. Distributions of standardised residuals from NHGR are generally more similar to a standard Gaussian than those from LR.
校正北海中期海洋气象预报
为了提高北海中部地区的预报性能,我们评估了商业预报提供商在0到168 h之间的预测水平上对显著波高HS、风速W和平均频谱波周期Tm的校准预报模型的价值。我们考虑了两种直接的校准模型,线性回归(LR)和非齐次高斯回归(NHGR),其中包含确定性、控制和集合平均预测协变量。我们表明,相对简单的校准模型(最多三个协变量)提供了良好的校准,而进一步的协变量的添加是不合理的。最优校准模型(用于物理量的预测平均值)总是使用同一物理量的确定性预测和集合平均预测,以及与不同物理量相关的协变量。最优协变量的选择是在每个预测水平上独立进行的,最优协变量集在不同的预测水平上表现出很大程度的一致性。因此,有可能指定一个一致的模型来校准给定的物理量,将所有视界的三个共同协变量集合在一起。对于给定物理量的NHGR模型,该物理量的集合预测标准差能够熟练地预测预测误差标准差,对于HS来说尤为如此。我们发现,一致的LR和NHGR校准模型有助于将所有HS、W和Tm的预测偏差降低到接近零,并且LR和NHGR校准之间的平均值差异很小。相对于单纯采用(未经校准的)确定性预测,LR和NHGR模型都有助于降低预测误差标准偏差,其中NHGR提供了更好的性能。NHGR的标准化残差分布通常比LR的更接近于标准高斯分布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Ocean Research
Applied Ocean Research 地学-工程:大洋
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
7.00%
发文量
316
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The aim of Applied Ocean Research is to encourage the submission of papers that advance the state of knowledge in a range of topics relevant to ocean engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信