{"title":"Causal relationship analysis and risk assessment of contributing factors in coal mine ordinary accidents: A case study (2002–2023)","authors":"Chenhui Yuan, Gui Fu , Jiangshi Zhang, Yongtun Li, Meng Han, Yuxuan Lu, Jinkun Zhao, Zhirong Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2025.107065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Systematically analyzing accident causes and identifying causal pathways is essential for eliminating accident triggers and effectively managing risks. This study conducted an in-depth analysis of 386 coal mine ordinary accident cases from 2002 to 2023, covering six major types of accidents: object striking, vehicle injury, mechanical injury, high falling, roof falling, and other injuries. The accident causation model-24Model, grounded theory, association rule mining, and Bayesian networks were integrated in this study, enabling a thorough exploration of internal causal relationships and the assessment of risk profiles. The main findings are as follows: Accident causes are categorized into four primary dimensions—safety culture, safety management system, safety capability, and unsafe acts/conditions—from which 75 factors are identified. Employing the Apriori algorithm, 78 association rules are extracted, revealing the causal logic between six types of accidents and their respective contributing factors. Based on these findings, a Bayesian network is constructed, and through conditional probability analysis and local sensitivity analysis, six probability-sensitivity risk matrices are developed, enabling the classification of factors into different risk levels for each accident scenario. A tiered prevention strategy is designed to address these risk levels. An accident prevention system is proposed, guided by safety culture, integrated into the management system, enhanced individual safety capabilities, and strengthened behavior control processes. Additionally, a three-line of defense risk management mechanism is introduced, providing a systematic, data-driven framework for safety management and accident prevention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20743,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 107065"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582025003325","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Systematically analyzing accident causes and identifying causal pathways is essential for eliminating accident triggers and effectively managing risks. This study conducted an in-depth analysis of 386 coal mine ordinary accident cases from 2002 to 2023, covering six major types of accidents: object striking, vehicle injury, mechanical injury, high falling, roof falling, and other injuries. The accident causation model-24Model, grounded theory, association rule mining, and Bayesian networks were integrated in this study, enabling a thorough exploration of internal causal relationships and the assessment of risk profiles. The main findings are as follows: Accident causes are categorized into four primary dimensions—safety culture, safety management system, safety capability, and unsafe acts/conditions—from which 75 factors are identified. Employing the Apriori algorithm, 78 association rules are extracted, revealing the causal logic between six types of accidents and their respective contributing factors. Based on these findings, a Bayesian network is constructed, and through conditional probability analysis and local sensitivity analysis, six probability-sensitivity risk matrices are developed, enabling the classification of factors into different risk levels for each accident scenario. A tiered prevention strategy is designed to address these risk levels. An accident prevention system is proposed, guided by safety culture, integrated into the management system, enhanced individual safety capabilities, and strengthened behavior control processes. Additionally, a three-line of defense risk management mechanism is introduced, providing a systematic, data-driven framework for safety management and accident prevention.
期刊介绍:
The Process Safety and Environmental Protection (PSEP) journal is a leading international publication that focuses on the publication of high-quality, original research papers in the field of engineering, specifically those related to the safety of industrial processes and environmental protection. The journal encourages submissions that present new developments in safety and environmental aspects, particularly those that show how research findings can be applied in process engineering design and practice.
PSEP is particularly interested in research that brings fresh perspectives to established engineering principles, identifies unsolved problems, or suggests directions for future research. The journal also values contributions that push the boundaries of traditional engineering and welcomes multidisciplinary papers.
PSEP's articles are abstracted and indexed by a range of databases and services, which helps to ensure that the journal's research is accessible and recognized in the academic and professional communities. These databases include ANTE, Chemical Abstracts, Chemical Hazards in Industry, Current Contents, Elsevier Engineering Information database, Pascal Francis, Web of Science, Scopus, Engineering Information Database EnCompass LIT (Elsevier), and INSPEC. This wide coverage facilitates the dissemination of the journal's content to a global audience interested in process safety and environmental engineering.