Causal relationship analysis and risk assessment of contributing factors in coal mine ordinary accidents: A case study (2002–2023)

IF 6.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Chenhui Yuan, Gui Fu , Jiangshi Zhang, Yongtun Li, Meng Han, Yuxuan Lu, Jinkun Zhao, Zhirong Wu
{"title":"Causal relationship analysis and risk assessment of contributing factors in coal mine ordinary accidents: A case study (2002–2023)","authors":"Chenhui Yuan,&nbsp;Gui Fu ,&nbsp;Jiangshi Zhang,&nbsp;Yongtun Li,&nbsp;Meng Han,&nbsp;Yuxuan Lu,&nbsp;Jinkun Zhao,&nbsp;Zhirong Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2025.107065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Systematically analyzing accident causes and identifying causal pathways is essential for eliminating accident triggers and effectively managing risks. This study conducted an in-depth analysis of 386 coal mine ordinary accident cases from 2002 to 2023, covering six major types of accidents: object striking, vehicle injury, mechanical injury, high falling, roof falling, and other injuries. The accident causation model-24Model, grounded theory, association rule mining, and Bayesian networks were integrated in this study, enabling a thorough exploration of internal causal relationships and the assessment of risk profiles. The main findings are as follows: Accident causes are categorized into four primary dimensions—safety culture, safety management system, safety capability, and unsafe acts/conditions—from which 75 factors are identified. Employing the Apriori algorithm, 78 association rules are extracted, revealing the causal logic between six types of accidents and their respective contributing factors. Based on these findings, a Bayesian network is constructed, and through conditional probability analysis and local sensitivity analysis, six probability-sensitivity risk matrices are developed, enabling the classification of factors into different risk levels for each accident scenario. A tiered prevention strategy is designed to address these risk levels. An accident prevention system is proposed, guided by safety culture, integrated into the management system, enhanced individual safety capabilities, and strengthened behavior control processes. Additionally, a three-line of defense risk management mechanism is introduced, providing a systematic, data-driven framework for safety management and accident prevention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20743,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 107065"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582025003325","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Systematically analyzing accident causes and identifying causal pathways is essential for eliminating accident triggers and effectively managing risks. This study conducted an in-depth analysis of 386 coal mine ordinary accident cases from 2002 to 2023, covering six major types of accidents: object striking, vehicle injury, mechanical injury, high falling, roof falling, and other injuries. The accident causation model-24Model, grounded theory, association rule mining, and Bayesian networks were integrated in this study, enabling a thorough exploration of internal causal relationships and the assessment of risk profiles. The main findings are as follows: Accident causes are categorized into four primary dimensions—safety culture, safety management system, safety capability, and unsafe acts/conditions—from which 75 factors are identified. Employing the Apriori algorithm, 78 association rules are extracted, revealing the causal logic between six types of accidents and their respective contributing factors. Based on these findings, a Bayesian network is constructed, and through conditional probability analysis and local sensitivity analysis, six probability-sensitivity risk matrices are developed, enabling the classification of factors into different risk levels for each accident scenario. A tiered prevention strategy is designed to address these risk levels. An accident prevention system is proposed, guided by safety culture, integrated into the management system, enhanced individual safety capabilities, and strengthened behavior control processes. Additionally, a three-line of defense risk management mechanism is introduced, providing a systematic, data-driven framework for safety management and accident prevention.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Process Safety and Environmental Protection
Process Safety and Environmental Protection 环境科学-工程:化工
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
929
审稿时长
8.0 months
期刊介绍: The Process Safety and Environmental Protection (PSEP) journal is a leading international publication that focuses on the publication of high-quality, original research papers in the field of engineering, specifically those related to the safety of industrial processes and environmental protection. The journal encourages submissions that present new developments in safety and environmental aspects, particularly those that show how research findings can be applied in process engineering design and practice. PSEP is particularly interested in research that brings fresh perspectives to established engineering principles, identifies unsolved problems, or suggests directions for future research. The journal also values contributions that push the boundaries of traditional engineering and welcomes multidisciplinary papers. PSEP's articles are abstracted and indexed by a range of databases and services, which helps to ensure that the journal's research is accessible and recognized in the academic and professional communities. These databases include ANTE, Chemical Abstracts, Chemical Hazards in Industry, Current Contents, Elsevier Engineering Information database, Pascal Francis, Web of Science, Scopus, Engineering Information Database EnCompass LIT (Elsevier), and INSPEC. This wide coverage facilitates the dissemination of the journal's content to a global audience interested in process safety and environmental engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信